vim-patch:7.4.1276

Problem:    Warning for not using return value of fcntl().
Solution:   Explicitly ignore the return value.

fbc4b4db3a
This commit is contained in:
Michael Ennen 2016-05-10 23:30:26 -07:00
parent 6396beb432
commit cf29b4025d
4 changed files with 8 additions and 6 deletions

View File

@ -1749,8 +1749,9 @@ failed:
#ifdef HAVE_FD_CLOEXEC
else {
int fdflags = fcntl(fd, F_GETFD);
if (fdflags >= 0 && (fdflags & FD_CLOEXEC) == 0)
fcntl(fd, F_SETFD, fdflags | FD_CLOEXEC);
if (fdflags >= 0 && (fdflags & FD_CLOEXEC) == 0) {
(void)fcntl(fd, F_SETFD, fdflags | FD_CLOEXEC);
}
}
#endif
xfree(buffer);

View File

@ -913,7 +913,7 @@ static bool mf_do_open(memfile_T *mfp, char_u *fname, int flags)
#ifdef HAVE_FD_CLOEXEC
int fdflags = fcntl(mfp->mf_fd, F_GETFD);
if (fdflags >= 0 && (fdflags & FD_CLOEXEC) == 0) {
fcntl(mfp->mf_fd, F_SETFD, fdflags | FD_CLOEXEC);
(void)fcntl(mfp->mf_fd, F_SETFD, fdflags | FD_CLOEXEC);
}
#endif
#ifdef HAVE_SELINUX

View File

@ -443,8 +443,9 @@ void ml_setname(buf_T *buf)
#ifdef HAVE_FD_CLOEXEC
{
int fdflags = fcntl(mfp->mf_fd, F_GETFD);
if (fdflags >= 0 && (fdflags & FD_CLOEXEC) == 0)
fcntl(mfp->mf_fd, F_SETFD, fdflags | FD_CLOEXEC);
if (fdflags >= 0 && (fdflags & FD_CLOEXEC) == 0) {
(void)fcntl(mfp->mf_fd, F_SETFD, fdflags | FD_CLOEXEC);
}
}
#endif
}

View File

@ -402,7 +402,7 @@ static int included_patches[] = {
// 1279 NA
// 1278 NA
// 1277 NA
// 1276,
1276,
// 1275 NA
// 1274 NA
// 1273,