mirror of
https://github.com/nosqlbench/nosqlbench.git
synced 2024-11-27 03:00:40 -06:00
update app docs
This commit is contained in:
parent
1ea5c8a1e5
commit
2847543aa5
17
nbr/src/main/resources/export-docs.md
Normal file
17
nbr/src/main/resources/export-docs.md
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
|
||||
# export-docs
|
||||
|
||||
This is the built-in app that allows NB5 to export docs for integration into other systems.
|
||||
During a build of NB5, this app is used to auto-inject much of the content into the doc site.
|
||||
Invoking it as `nb5 export-docs` creates (or overwrites) a file called `exported-docs.zip`,
|
||||
containing the markdown source files for binding functions, bundled apps, specifications, and so on.
|
||||
|
||||
Using this mechanism ensures that:
|
||||
1. NB5 contributors who build drivers, bindings, or other modular pieces can use idiomatic forms of
|
||||
documentation, allowing them to work in one code base.
|
||||
2. Contributors are encouraged to make integrated tests follow a literate programming pattern,
|
||||
so that they work as examples as well as verification tools.
|
||||
3. Users of NB5 will never see documentation which is included in integrated tests, because any
|
||||
failing test will prevent a failed build from being published or considered for a release.
|
||||
|
||||
This is a relatively new mechanism that will be improved further.
|
||||
|
94
virtdata-api/src/main/resources/virtdata.md
Normal file
94
virtdata-api/src/main/resources/virtdata.md
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
weight: 225811593
|
||||
title: virdata
|
||||
---
|
||||
# virdata
|
||||
|
||||
NB5 contains a bundled virtdata app which lets you verify bindings from the command line.
|
||||
It is useful for sanity checking values as well as getting a concurrent performance baseline for
|
||||
specific binding recipes.
|
||||
|
||||
# diagnostic mode
|
||||
|
||||
The `diagnose` mode of virtdata can be used to explain binding resolution logic and potentially
|
||||
how to fix a binding that doesn't resolve properly:
|
||||
|
||||
```shell
|
||||
nb5 virtdata diagnose "Combinations('0-90-9'); ToInt();"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
# perftest mode
|
||||
|
||||
To see the options you can simply run `nb5 virtdata testmapper`, which gives you
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
ARGS: checkperf 'specifier' threads bufsize start end
|
||||
example: 'timeuuid()' 100 1000 0 10000
|
||||
specifier: A VirtData function specifier.
|
||||
threads: The number of concurrent threads to run.
|
||||
bufsize: The number of cycles to give each thread at a time.
|
||||
start: The start cycle for the test, inclusive.
|
||||
end: The end cycle for the test, exclusive.
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Assuming you have a working binding recipe that you want to measure for
|
||||
concurrent performance, you can use the form below:
|
||||
|
||||
```shell
|
||||
nb5 virtdata testmapper "Combinations('0-90-9'); ToInt();" 96 1000 0 1000000
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Here is what happens when you run this:
|
||||
|
||||
1. The binding is resolved.
|
||||
2. A single thread (the first thread) generates the values into a reference buffer.
|
||||
3. The specified number of threads is started, and synchronized for simultaneous start.
|
||||
4. Each thread is given successive batches of input values from the cycle rage specified, in
|
||||
chunks of bufsize each. A dot `.` is printed to the console for each completed chunk.
|
||||
5. Once all threads are complete, each checks their values against the reference buffer, and an
|
||||
exception is thrown if any difference are found. (This would mean concurrency is affecting
|
||||
the values, which is not allowed for binding functions.)
|
||||
6. After all chunks are generated and verified, statistics are displayed to the console:
|
||||
|
||||
## output details
|
||||
|
||||
```text,linenos
|
||||
run data = [derived values in brackets]
|
||||
specifier = 'Combinations('0-90-9'); ToInt();'
|
||||
threads = 96
|
||||
min = 0
|
||||
max = 1000000
|
||||
[count] = 1000000
|
||||
buffersize = 1000
|
||||
[totalGenTimeMs] = 2408.874399
|
||||
[totalCmpTimeMs] = 2274.510746
|
||||
[genPerMs] = 39852.638
|
||||
[cmpPerMs] = 42206.879
|
||||
[genPerS] = 39852638.245
|
||||
[cmpPerS] = 42206879.070
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
This shows that on a 12 core (24 thread) system, Around **40 million** variates are able to be
|
||||
generated from the above recipe (across all cores, of course).
|
||||
|
||||
In detail:
|
||||
* `[totalGenTimeMs]` tracks the total time the thread pool spent generating data, in milliseconds.
|
||||
* `[totalCmpTimeMs]` tracks the total time the thread pool spent cross-checking data across threads.
|
||||
* `[genPerMs]` and `[cmpPerMs]` show the calculated rates for generation and validation _per
|
||||
millisecond_, respectively.
|
||||
* `[genPerS]` and `[cmpPerS]` show the calculated rates for generation and validation _per second_,
|
||||
respectively.
|
||||
|
||||
## interpretation
|
||||
|
||||
This example shows how effective variate generation can be. This doesn't mean that you can
|
||||
easily simulate 40 million operations with this data. However, it does _anecdotally_ indicate
|
||||
the proportional load that generation puts on the system. For example, if you were generating
|
||||
around 400K ops/s from a client with only this binding, it would be reasonable that variate
|
||||
generation consumes around (400,000/40,000,000) of the system's cycles, or around 1%.
|
||||
|
||||
More realistic testing scenarios are likely to use proportionally more due to the amount of data
|
||||
generation which is needed. Still, generating synthetic data makes for a more capable testing
|
||||
harnesses because of the extra headroom you leave in your system for other necessary work, like
|
||||
managing a driver's connection pool or serdes on requests and responses.
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user