IntenseWebs/LibreQoS
3
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/LibreQoE/LibreQoS.git synced 2025-02-09 03:15:33 -06:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Update README.md

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Robert Chacón 2021-07-08 10:23:58 -06:00 committed by GitHub
parent a8a5156734
commit 5dae9a782a
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
1 changed files with 2 additions and 1 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

3
README.md
View File

@ -12,7 +12,8 @@ The impact of fq_codel on a 3000Mbps connection vs hard rate limiting — a 30x
>“FQ_Codel provides great isolation... if you've got low-rate videoconferencing and low rate web traffic they never get dropped. A lot of issues with IW10 go away, because all the other traffic sees is the front of the queue. You don't know how big its window is, but you don't care because you are not affected by it. FQ_Codel increases utilization across your entire networking fabric, especially for bidirectional traffic... If we're sticking code into boxes to deploy codel, don't do that. Deploy fq_codel. It's just an across the board win.”
> - Van Jacobson | IETF 84 Talk
## Typical Results
<img src="docs/bloat.png" width="500">
<img src="docs/bloat.png" width="350">
# Network Design
* Edge and Core routers with MTU 1500 on links between them
* If you use MPLS, you would terminate MPLS traffic at the core router. LibreQoS cannot decapsulate MPLS on its own.