Background
When creating webhooks on a site without the Discourse Category Experts plugin installed, the category_experts_unapproved_event and category_experts_approved_event webhook events are getting automatically added to webhooks without a way to disable them.
The category_experts_unapproved_event and category_experts_approved_event webhook events are associated with the Discourse Category Experts plugin so I am moving these webhook events into the Category Experts plugin.
Changes
This PR deletes Category Experts plugin specific webhook event types added into core.
The new style is called `categories_only_optimized` and it is designed
to show only the parent categories, without any subcategories. This
works best for communities with many categories (over a thousand).
When attempting to [set up the Docker development environment](https://meta.discourse.org/t/install-discourse-for-development-using-docker/102009), I was seeing the following error when running `d/boot_dev --init`:
```
ActiveRecord::NoDatabaseError: We could not find your database: discourse_development. Available database configurations can be found in config/database.yml. (ActiveRecord::NoDatabaseError)
```
Running `db:create` before the `db:migrate` fixed this issue for me. It appears to be safe to run `db:create` even if the database already exists, running `d/rake db:create` locally shows an info message at the database already exists, but doesn't exit with an error.
* UX: Apply admin table classes for consistent mobile styling on custom flags
* UX: Apply admin table classes for consistent mobile styling on custom flags
* UX: Apply admin table classes for consistent mobile styling on backups
* UX: Apply admin table classes for consistent mobile styling on plugins list
* DEV: tweaks on admin table
* UX: Apply admin table classes for consistent mobile styling on chat plugin
* apply prettier
* apply lint
* DEV: removed commented out code
* DEV: removed unnecessary div element
* scroll to the element
* remove the workaround
* revert
* add an extra assertion
* add enabled check
* improve switching
* rm
---------
Co-authored-by: Jarek Radosz <jradosz@gmail.com>
When rendering the initial search options, we re-use the `AssistantItem` component.
`AssistantItem` requires that you pass in the required params to define what _type_ of component it will be - category, tag, tag intersection, user, etc. This flexibility is nice, as we can just loop through all `@results` and pass in params, without having to predefine what _type_ of result it is.
It is is not very good when it comes to seperating the html strucutre of each unique _type_. This is an example of the initial search results:
<img width="408" alt="Screenshot 2024-10-23 at 9 04 18 AM" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/46795697-6246-4b60-be18-fea200a57baa">
You can see that both categories **and** tags are being rendered. The HTML strcuture looks like so:
```html
<ul class="search-menu-assistant">
<li class="search-menu-assistant-item">
<a class="search-link" href="#"> CATEGORY </a>
</li>
<li class="search-menu-assistant-item">
<a class="search-link" href="#"> CATEGORY </a>
</li>
<li class="search-menu-assistant-item">
<a class="search-link" href="#"> TAG </a>
</li>
<li class="search-menu-assistant-item">
<a class="search-link" href="#"> TAG </a>
</li>
</ul>
```
There is no way to differentiate between the types, even though some are categories and others tags.
This PR adds a _typeClass_ to each component, that will be a additional class included at the top level of the component HTML structure.
```html
<ul class="search-menu-assistant">
<li class="category search-menu-assistant-item">
<a class="search-link" href="#"> CATEGORY </a>
</li>
<li class="category search-menu-assistant-item">
<a class="search-link" href="#"> CATEGORY </a>
</li>
<li class="tag search-menu-assistant-item">
<a class="search-link" href="#"> TAG </a>
</li>
<li class="tag search-menu-assistant-item">
<a class="search-link" href="#"> TAG </a>
</li>
</ul>
```
_See `.category` and `.tag` attached to each `search-menu-assistant-item`._
This will help us identify which _type_ it is, and allow devs to target and customize each element by _type_.
A followup to f05b984208
* modifiers to keep track of components' lifecycles, instead of did-insert/did-update/willDestroy
* proper glimmer-friendly tracking in related models
* caching
* `@outletArgs`
* gjs
We were using a modifier purely for its lifecycle hooks - not to modify an element. This commit switches to using a helper, which provides a similar lifecycle, but without needing to be attached to an element.
Bug introduced in this PR https://github.com/discourse/discourse/pull/29244
When the experiment toggle button was introduced, new features did not look right when the toggle button was not available.
In addition, the plugin name can be an empty string. In that case, information about new features should be displayed.
In #29272 we added a backwards-compatible way to prevent duplicate problem check trackers. However, there was a mistake in the PR that would instead create duplicate admin notices. As a result, a number of admins now have multiple copies of the same admin notice in their dashboard.
The root cause was fixed in #29329, preventing new duplicates.
This PR is here to clean up notices that were already created.
Admin notices are meant to be ephemeral. Instead of going through hoops to delete duplicates and update the remaining notices' unstructured field with the correct target, it is a lot less error-prone to delete all notices and let the problem check system re-create them.
The real-time checks run every time the dashboard is loaded, so they will appear to never have been deleted. Any notices related to scheduled checks will be added back on the next run. This will happen within at most one hour, and isn't time sensitive.
…or a tip with the highest priority.
This regressed in 597ef11195 where we got rid of `next()` calls, so we'd render the first tip we encounter.
The commit also adds a test and updates existing ones.
