Commit Graph

45 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Daniel Waterworth
6e161d3e75
DEV: Allow fab! without block (#24314)
The most common thing that we do with fab! is:

    fab!(:thing) { Fabricate(:thing) }

This commit adds a shorthand for this which is just simply:

    fab!(:thing)

i.e. If you omit the block, then, by default, you'll get a `Fabricate`d object using the fabricator of the same name.
2023-11-09 16:47:59 -06:00
Loïc Guitaut
783c935dcb DEV: Set limits for text fields in reviewables 2023-05-03 09:54:54 +02:00
chapoi
e52bbc1230
UX/DEV: Review queue redesign fixes (#20239)
* UX: add type tag and design update

* UX: clarify status copy in reviewQ

* DEV: switch to selectKit

* UX: color approve/reject buttons in RQ

* DEV: regroup actions

* UX: add type tag and design update

* UX: clarify status copy in reviewQ

* Join questions for flagged post with "or" with new I18n function
* Move ReviewableScores component out of context
* Add CSS classes to reviewable-item based on human type

* UX: add table header for scoring

* UX: don't display % score

* UX: prefix modifier class with dash

* UX: reviewQ flag table styling

* UX: consistent use of ignore icon

* DEV: only show context question on pending status

* UX: only show table headers on pending status

* DEV: reviewQ regroup actions for hidden posts

* UX: reviewQ > approve/reject buttons

* UX: reviewQ add fadeout

* UX: reviewQ styling

* DEV: move scores back into component

* UX: reviewQ mobile styling

* UX: score table on mobile

* UX: reviewQ > move meta info outside table

* UX: reviewQ > score layout fixes

* DEV: readd `agree_and_keep` and fix the spec tests.

* Fix the spec tests

* fix the quint test

* DEV: readd deleting replies

* UX: reviewQ copy tweaks

* DEV: readd test for ignore + delete replies

* Remove old

* FIX: Add perform_ignore back in for backwards compat

* DEV: add an action alias `ignore` for `ignore_and_do_nothing`.

---------

Co-authored-by: Martin Brennan <martin@discourse.org>
Co-authored-by: Vinoth Kannan <svkn.87@gmail.com>
2023-03-02 16:40:53 +01:00
Blake Erickson
c540167982
FIX: Remove action buttons if post has already been reviewed (#20126)
* FIX: Remove action buttons if post has already been reviewed

* Change the approve to reject test to expect an error

* Adds a controller spec to ensure you can't edit a non-pending review item

* Remove unnessary conditional
2023-02-06 11:55:52 -07:00
David Taylor
cb932d6ee1
DEV: Apply syntax_tree formatting to spec/* 2023-01-09 11:49:28 +00:00
Osama Sayegh
3ff6f6a5e1
FIX: Exclude claimed reviewables from user menu (#19179)
Users who can access the review queue can claim a pending reviewable(s) which means that the claimed reviewable(s) can only be handled by the user who claimed it. Currently, we show claimed reviewables in the user menu, but this can be annoying for other reviewers because they can't do anything about a reviewable claimed by someone. So this PR makes sure that we only show in the user menu reviewables that are claimed by nobody or claimed by the current user.

Internal topic: t/77235.
2022-12-01 07:09:57 +08:00
Roman Rizzi
94aba90c56
DEV: Delete reviewable associations when deleting (#18472) 2022-10-05 13:38:41 -03:00
Osama Sayegh
079450c9e4
DEV: Do not show handled reviewables in the user menu (#18402)
Currently, the reviewables tab in the user menu shows pending reviewables at the top of the menu and fills the remaining space in the menu with old/handled reviewables. This PR makes the revieables tab show only pending reviewables and hides the tab altogether from the menu if there are no pending reviewables. We're going to follow-up with another change soon that will show pending reviewables in the main tab of the user menu.

Internal topic: t/73220.
2022-09-30 06:10:07 +03:00
Loïc Guitaut
26fe047724 DEV: Use AR enums in reviewables related code
This is the first patch of many to replace our custom enums in Ruby by
the ones provided by `ActiveRecord`.
2022-09-22 14:44:27 +02:00
Loïc Guitaut
3eaac56797 DEV: Use proper wording for contexts in specs 2022-08-04 11:05:02 +02:00
Osama Sayegh
ce9eec8606
DEV: Combine all header notification bubbles into one in the new user menu (#17718)
Extracted from https://github.com/discourse/discourse/pull/17379.
2022-08-03 08:57:59 +03:00
Osama Sayegh
988a175e94
DEV: Add reviewables tab to the new user menu (#17630)
This commit is a subset of the changes proposed in https://github.com/discourse/discourse/pull/17379.
2022-07-28 11:16:33 +03:00
Loïc Guitaut
296aad430a DEV: Use describe for methods in specs 2022-07-27 16:35:27 +02:00
David Taylor
c9dab6fd08
DEV: Automatically require 'rails_helper' in all specs (#16077)
It's very easy to forget to add `require 'rails_helper'` at the top of every core/plugin spec file, and omissions can cause some very confusing/sporadic errors.

By setting this flag in `.rspec`, we can remove the need for `require 'rails_helper'` entirely.
2022-03-01 17:50:50 +00:00
Mark VanLandingham
14a13dc192
FIX: Check type of existing reviewables when new reviewable is created (#13662) 2021-07-07 11:45:00 -05:00
Roman Rizzi
4dc8c3c409
FEATURE: Blocking is optional when deleting a user from the review queue. (#13375)
Subclasses must call #delete_user_actions inside build_actions to support user deletion. The method adds a delete user bundle, which has a delete and a delete + block option. Every subclass is responsible for implementing these actions.
2021-06-15 12:35:45 -03:00
Dan Ungureanu
197e3f24ce
FEATURE: Show stale reviewable to other clients (#13114)
The previous commits removed reviewables leading to a bad user
experience. This commit updates the status, replaces actions with a
message and greys out the reviewable.
2021-05-26 09:47:35 +10:00
Roman Rizzi
4d9686c494
FEATURE: Reviewed by filter. (#11405)
New reviewable filter to only display reviewables handled by a specific user.
2020-12-04 14:09:05 -03:00
Roman Rizzi
f2bef7ea8f
FIX: Store Reviewable's force_review as a boolean. (#11219)
* FIX: Store Reviewable's force_review as a boolean.

Using the `force_review` flag raises the score to hit the minimum visibility threshold. This strategy turned out to be ineffective on sites with a high number of flags, where these values could rapidly fluctuate.

This change adds a `force_review` column on the reviewables table and modifies the `Reviewable#list_for` method to show these items when passing the `status: :pending` option, even if the score is not high enough. ReviewableQueuedPosts and ReviewableUsers are always created using this option.
2020-11-13 08:19:01 -03:00
jbrw
06073fe8c6
FEATURE: Allow group moderators to close/archive topics
* FEATURE: Allow group moderators to close/archive topics
2020-07-14 12:36:19 -04:00
Roman Rizzi
461df7d050
UX: Rename Priority to score for sorting. (#9846) 2020-05-27 12:50:28 -03:00
Martin Brennan
9981fa4466
FIX: Prevent column name conflicts in reviewable code (#9753)
We were getting errors like this in Reviewables in some cases:

```
ActiveRecord::StatementInvalid (PG::AmbiguousColumn: ERROR:  column reference "category_id" is ambiguous
LINE 4: ...TRUE) OR (reviewable_by_group_id IN (NULL))) AND (category_i...
```

The problem that was making everything go boom is that plugins can add their own custom filters for Reviewables. If one is doing an INNER JOIN on topics, which has its own category_id column, we would get the above AmbiguousColumn error. The solution here is to just make all references to the reviewable columns in the list_for and viewable_by code prefixed by the table name e.g. reviewables.category_id.
2020-05-13 09:05:56 +10:00
Roman Rizzi
e52e7f6e75
FIX: Include pending queued users regardless of their score (#9372) 2020-04-07 11:42:12 -03:00
romanrizzi
cfec10a568 FIX: Moderators should be able to review flagged PMs since this has always been like this 2020-03-20 12:28:36 -03:00
Roman Rizzi
080960a15e
FIX: Show the envelope icon when the flagged post is a PM. Flagged PM must be exclusively reviewed by admins (#9232) 2020-03-19 15:12:42 -03:00
Roman Rizzi
fadb2b7157
FEATURE: Users cannot reflag recently handled items using the same reason unless the post was edited, or it was reviewed more than 24 hours ago. (#8969) 2020-02-14 13:43:48 -03:00
Roman Rizzi
3413ec0a5c
FEATURE: Pending queued posts are included even if they don't pass the minimum priority threshold (#8925) 2020-02-11 15:29:22 -03:00
Roman Rizzi
c751291769
FIX: The 'reviewed' status filter should include deleted elements (#8630) 2019-12-30 14:56:17 -03:00
Roman Rizzi
c92f0b8775
FEATURE: New API to apply custom filters to the review queue (#8392) 2019-11-22 16:33:10 -03:00
Robin Ward
3c6a5836c2 FIX: Sensitivity did not work by default
Forums without previously calculated scores would return the same values
for low/medium/high sensitivity. Now those are scaled based on the
default value.

The default value has also been changed from 10.0 to 12.5 based on
observing data from live discourse forums.
2019-09-19 13:26:17 -04:00
Dan Ungureanu
3008ecccbd FIX: Notify on Reviewable update. (#7980)
If a post is flagged after an action was already performed on it, it
will update the previous Reviable instance and not create a new one.
The notification logic was implemented in the :create callback which was
completely skipped in this case.
2019-08-08 16:04:34 +02:00
Guo Xiang Tan
32b4bdaccd DEV: Remove mocks from tests. 2019-08-08 15:17:45 +08:00
Robin Ward
f1b3e72581 FIX: Don't hide/close topics if they don't meet minimum visibility
There are situations where depending on site settings, actions could be
taken due to flags (for example, hiding a post) but those actions were
not visibile in the review queue due to visibility settings.

This patch makes sure that the minimum score required for an action such
as hiding a post needs to meet the visibility for a moderator to see it.
2019-08-06 15:36:39 -04:00
Robin Ward
d902c4eb9f FEATURE: Can sort reviewable queue
Choices are Priority / Created At (and desc versions.)
2019-06-05 13:21:05 -04:00
Robin Ward
89b84651c3 Migrate score settings to use sensitivities
We hide scores so these settings no longer made sense.
2019-05-24 15:44:24 -04:00
Robin Ward
e74cd54fc6 REFACTOR: Replace score bonuses with low/med/high priorities
We removed score from the UX so it makes more sense to have sites set
priorities instead of score bonuses.
2019-05-23 11:54:45 -04:00
Robin Ward
5af7c90bab FEATURE: Hide Reviewable scores, change score filter to Priority
We found score hard to understand. It is still there behind the scenes
for sorting purposes, but it is no longer shown.

You can now filter by minimum priority (low, med, high) instead of
score.
2019-05-07 14:05:23 -04:00
Daniel Waterworth
e219588142 DEV: Prefabrication (test optimization) (#7414)
* Introduced fab!, a helper that creates database state for a group

It's almost identical to let_it_be, except:

 1. It creates a new object for each test by default,
 2. You can disable it using PREFABRICATION=0
2019-05-07 13:12:20 +10:00
Robin Ward
da0e37512a FIX: Add test to confirm updating category works.
Also replaces a missing translation key that 99.9% of users would never
see.
2019-05-01 11:37:28 -04:00
Robin Ward
404b35bd04 FEATURE: Category Reviewable by Group
Allow a group to review content in a particular category.
2019-04-30 15:23:06 -04:00
Sam Saffron
4ea21fa2d0 DEV: use #frozen_string_literal: true on all spec
This change both speeds up specs (less strings to allocate) and helps catch
cases where methods in Discourse are mutating inputs.

Overall we will be migrating everything to use #frozen_string_literal: true
it will take a while, but this is the first and safest move in this direction
2019-04-30 10:27:42 +10:00
Daniel Waterworth
ad44243a57 Removed unused let blocks (#7446)
The bodies of these blocks were never evaluated.
2019-04-29 15:08:56 +08:00
Robin Ward
646cdfa449 FIX: Approved posts were not enqueueing alerts 2019-04-23 17:30:12 -04:00
Robin Ward
6f56fba016 UX: Update post actions to "Approve Post" and "Reject Post"
This should be more clear.
2019-04-23 12:19:11 -04:00
Robin Ward
b58867b6e9 FEATURE: New 'Reviewable' model to make reviewable items generic
Includes support for flags, reviewable users and queued posts, with REST API
backwards compatibility.

Co-Authored-By: romanrizzi <romanalejandro@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-By: jjaffeux <j.jaffeux@gmail.com>
2019-03-28 12:45:10 -04:00