When revising a post, if the topic that post belonged to did not have a category attached it would error with
> NoMethodError (undefined method `read_restricted' for nil:NilClass)
The updated user menu is the default for new sites, and will soon be enabled on older sites. This commit removes the 'EXPERIMENTAL' warning from the new `registerUserMenuTab` API, and adds a note to the `addUserMenuGlyph` documentation.
* FIX: Do not overwrite existing thumbnails
When auto generating video thumbnails they should not overwrite any
existing topic thumbnails.
This also addresses an issue with capitalized file extensions like .MOV
that were being excluded.
* Update app/models/post.rb
Remove comment
Co-authored-by: Penar Musaraj <pmusaraj@gmail.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: Penar Musaraj <pmusaraj@gmail.com>
Followup to 17ba00c395.
Fix for https://meta.discourse.org/t/-/261917
This fixes a usability issue where the user couldn't switch to the user
menu when the search menu was visible and the text in the input was
selected.
Explanation: The `click` event is triggered both when clicking and when
selecting some text and clicking. This means that when selecting text in
the search input, at the end of the selection event, a click event was
triggered. And if that click event happened to be outside of the search
menu, then the menu would be dismissed.
Previously, we fixed this by checked if a current text selection was
present. But that results in a small side-effect of not switching to
other menus. This PR switches to setting a flag during `mouseDown` and
then using that flag when evaluating whether to trigger clickOutside or
not.
We are seeing issues with the composer not being able to close due to the addition of a error message when rescuing from `Draft::OutOfSequence`. This PR will revert to the original solution implemented prior to https://github.com/discourse/discourse/pull/21148 that just silently rescues from `Draft::OutOfSequence`
This PR adds the ability to destroy reviewables for a passed user via the API. This was not possible before as this action was reserved for reviewables for you created only.
If a user is an admin and calls the `#destroy` action from the API they are able to destroy a reviewable for a passed user. A user can be targeted by passed either their:
- username
- external_id (for SSO)
to the request.
In the case you attempt to destroy a non-personal reviewable and
- You are not an admin
- You do not access the `#destroy` action via the API
you will raise a `Discourse::InvalidAccess` (403) and will not succeed in destroying the reviewable.
Responding to negative behaviour tends to solicit more of the same. Common wisdom states: "don't feed the trolls".
This change codifies that advice by introducing a new nudge when hitting the reply button on a flagged post. It will be shown if either the current user, or two other users (configurable via a site setting) have flagged the post.
This commit fixes the following scenario:
1. The user is searching for hashtags in chat, where the subcategory
type is not highest-ranked in priority order.
2. There can, but doesn't have to be, a higher-ranked matching chat
channel that has the same slug as the subcategory.
3. Since it is not the highest-ranked type, the subcategory, which
normally has a ref of parent:child, has its ref changed to
child::category, which does not work
This was happening because whenever a hashtag type was not highest
ranked, if _any_ other hashtag results conflicted slugs, we would
append the ::type suffix. Now, we only append this suffix if a
higher-ranked type conflicts with the hashtag, and we use the current ref
to build the new typed ref to preserve this parent:child format as well,
it's more accurate.
This PR adds the ability to destroy drafts for a passed user via the API. This was not possible before as this action was reserved for only your personal drafts.
If a user is an admin and calls the `#destroy` action from the API they are able to destroy a draft for a passed user. A user can be targeted by passed either their:
- username
- external_id (for SSO)
to the request.
In the case you attempt to destroy a non-personal draft and
- You are not an admin
- You do not access the `#destroy` action via the API
you will raise a `Discourse::InvalidAccess` (403) and will not succeed in destroying the draft.
It's backward compatible so still supports our 3.28 ember-source.
The visible change is finally getting rid of this message:
```
WARNING: Node v18.12.0 is not tested against Ember CLI on your platform. We recommend that you use the most-recent "Active LTS" version of Node.js. See https://git.io/v7S5n for details.
```
---
`@ember/string` dependency is added for future compatibility. See: https://github.com/ember-cli/ember-cli/pull/10125
---
`tests/helpers/index.js` is unused for now, but is a nice pattern. We could move some of our test setup into local `setupApplicationTest/setupRenderingTest/setupTest` helpers.
Co-authored-by: David Taylor <david@taylorhq.com>
All supported browsers use `transitionend` event now, so this code is not necessary and makes it difficult to use that event in tests (you'd have to trigger all variants to cover the bases)
That function was used only in core (no hits in all-the*) in two places, so I think it's rather safe to just trash it without deprecating it first.
(History Corner – this helper was originally added in the initial commit of Discourse! 1839614bcc/app/assets/javascripts/discourse/components/transition_helper.js.coffee)
* FEATURE: add a setting to allowlist DiscourseConnect return path domains
This commit adds a site setting to allowlist DiscourseConnect return
path domains. The setting needs supports exact domain or wildcard
character (*) to allow for any domain as return path.
* Add more specs to clarify what is allowed in site setting
* Update setting description to explain what is allowed
Following a change in e9f7262813 which prevents the notification level to be returned from the update endpoint, the model couldn't update itself. This commit makes the update manually and adds a test to prevent future regressions.
Note we could also change the backend endpoint, but this should work correctly with minimum risk.
As a single example, if a `<kbd>` tag is wrapped by a `<a>` link, it doesn't inherit the link color:
`[<kbd>❓ **Support**</kbd>](https://meta.discourse.org)`
It's because the `<kbd>` tag has a `color: var(--primary);` CSS rule which seems superfluous.
If we disable it, the `<kbd>` tag inherits all the normal colors (including the link color 👌).
The direct `<kbd>` parent that assigns the text color is `<html>` (can't go higher!) which has an identical `color: var(--primary);`.
WCAG palettes don't seem to assign specific colors in this context.
It seems fairly safe to remove `color: var(--primary);` from `<kbd>` so it won't interfere anymore with its content.
