the radical change in the implementation doesn't stem from the glimmer migration, but rather the fact that previously the component was single-use – changing any of its args didn't (and couldn't) be reflected because hljs was replacing the nodes so all the ember bookkeeping was gone.
Co-authored-by: David Taylor <david@taylorhq.com>
There is a risk of overriding and then deleting a prop of the context in case of a naming clash between localName and that prop, e.g.
```js
class Test {
item = "foo";
items = [1, 2];
}
const template = `
{{#each items as |item|}}
{{item}}
{{/each}}
`;
const compiledTemplate = compile(template);
const object = new Test();
// object.item === "foo"
const output = compiledTemplate(object, RUNTIME_OPTIONS);
// object.item === undefined
```
…but I think we can accept this risk and just be careful.`#each` isn't widely used in hbr anyway (as proven by the other long-standing and recently fixed bug) and hbr is on its way out anyway.
his is a new feature that lets admins dismiss notices from the dashboard. This helps with self-service in cases where a notice is "stuck", while we work on provisions to prevent "sticking" in the first place.
In some very rare cases, the header element doesn't yet have the bg
when this code is run. This PR adds a simple retry mechanism.
No tests because this relies on specific load timing from the browser.
In TopicController, in addition to ensure_can_move_posts!, we also
checked if the topic is private message in this line:
```ruby
raise Discourse::InvalidAccess if params[:archetype] == "private_message" && !guardian.is_staff?
```
However, this was not present in `guardian.can_move_posts?`. As a result,
the frontend topic view got an incorrect serialized result, thinking
that TL4 could move the private message post. In fact, once they tried
to move it, they got the `InvalidAccess` error message.
This commit fixes that TL4 will no longer sees the "move to" option in
the "select post" panel for a private message.
Anonymous users are "shadow" users created when an existing real user desires to post anonymously. This feature is off by default, but it can be enabled via the `allow_anonymous_posting` site setting. Those shadow users shouldn't be included in the users directory (`/u`).
In 14cf8eacf1, we added the
`user_search_similar_results` site setting which when enabled will use
trigram matching for similarity search in `UserSearch`. However, we
noted that adding the `index_users_on_username_lower_trgm` index is
causing the PG planner to not use the `index_users_on_username_lower`
index when the `=` operator is used against the `username_lower` column.
Based on the PG mailing list discussion where support for the `=`
operator in gist_trgm_ops was being considered, it stated that "I also have checked that btree_gist is preferred over pg_trgm gist
index for equality search." This is however quite different from reality
on our own PG clusters where the btree index is not preferred leading to
significantly slower queries when the `=` operator is used.
Since the pg_trgm gist index is only used for queries when the `user_search_similar_results` site setting
is enabled, we decided to drop the feature instead as it is hidden and
disabled by default. As such, we can consider it experiemental and drop
it without deprecation.
PG mailing list discussiong: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAPpHfducQ0U8noyb2L3VChsyBMsc5V2Ej2whmEuxmAgHa2jVXg%40mail.gmail.com
Previously shortcuts added to toolbar buttons will automatically use the same action assigned to the button when clicked. This PR adds an additional optional key that can be passed when creating a new toolbar button: shortcutAction which allows for passing a custom action for the keyboard shortcut. This way a button can have a specific action when a keyboard shortcut is pressed that's different from when the button is clicked.
Followup to e25578d702
Using execCommand to replace the entire contents of the textarea is very slow for larger posts (it seems the browser does a reflow after every 'virtual keypress'.
This commit updates the `replaceText` function to be more surgical with its `insertAt` calls. Now it only selects & replaces the characters which are actually being replaced.
- fetch models inside services
- validate `user_id` in contracts
- use policy objects
- extract more logic to actions
- write specs for services and action
Previously for reviewables that could be claimed, we positioned
the "you can claim / you must claim" message and button underneath
the "Is there something wrong with this post?" message but _before_
the reviewable action buttons like Yes/No/Ignore. This was a confusing
flow.
This commit fixes the issue, and also makes it so if claiming is
required and the reviewable has not been claimed, we don't show
the "Is there something wrong with this post?" which was showing
with no buttons.
Followup 5a8e7c5f29
The admin report results need to be side by side
with the filter for the report, which sits on the
right. The previous commit made it stacked.
Followup 0323b366f3
This was happening because another spec was adding a
report using the plugin API, but there was nothing
resetting that, so later in the reports controller
when we did Report.singleton_methods, we ended up
with another report with no translation, causing another
error.
Currently, when the custom flag has the same name as the system flag (which is disabled) then it is not displayed. To fix the problem, `custom_` prefix as `name_key` is used to distinguish between the system and the custom flag.
I considered writing a migration to fix existing custom flags name key. However, at the end of migration I would need to run rails code to reset cache `Flag.reset_flag_settings!`. I decided to skip that step as it is a very edge case. If someone has the same flag name as the system flag, then all they have to do is edit the flag and click save.
In addition, I made 2 small fixes:
- edit flag title was missing translation;
- flag form UI was not showing that description is the required field.
