The order of chat direct message groups can sometimes place usernames in an unexpected order, this change tests multiple combinations of usernames and accepts them no matter what order they are in.
In 4e7a75a7ec, we moved to a single admin plugin page and added a few fields to the "plugin serializer" but we already had a proper route with the correct serializers to properly load channels.
This fixes it by removing the "add_to_serializer" calls and changed the calls to "/admin/plugins/chat.json" to the proper "/admin/plugins/chat/hooks.json" route.
Meta - https://meta.discourse.org/t/names-are-missing-from-list-when-creating-new-chat-channel-webhooks/308481
When chat is enabled, there's a scheduled job that runs every 5 minutes to check whether we need to send a "chat summary" email to users with unread chat messages or mentions.
On Discourse with a large number of users, the query used wasn't optimal and sometimes taking minutes. Which isn't good when the query is called every 5 minutes 😬
This PR reworks the query in `Chat::Mailer.send_unread_mentions_summary`.
Instead of starting from the `users` table, it starts from the `user_chat_channel_memberships` table which is the main piece tying everything together.
The new query is mostly similar to the previous one, with some bug fixes (like ensuring the user has `allow_private_messages` enabled for direct messages) and is also slightly simpler since it doesn't keep track of the `memberships_with_unread_messages` anymore. That part has been moved to the `user_notifications.chat_summary` email method.
The `UserEmailExtension` has been deleted since that was using to N+1 update the `user_chat_channel_memberships.last_unread_mention_when_emailed_it`(quite a mouthful 😛) but that's now done directly in the `user_notifications.chat_summary` email method.
The "plat de résistance" of that PR - the `user_notifications.chat_summary` method has been re-worked for improved performances 🚀
Instead of doing everything in one query, it does 4 tiny ones.
- One to retrieve the list of unread mentions (@something) in "category" channels
- One to retrieve the list of unread messages in "direct message" channels (aka. 1-1 and group discussions)
- One to load all the chat messages for each "category" channels from the last unread mention
- One to load all the chat messages for each "direct message" channels from the last unread message
All the specs for both `Chat::Mailer` and `UserNotification.chat_summary` have been rewriten for easier comprehension and faster execution (mostly by not using chat services which makes the specs go 10x slower...)
Internal ref - t/129848
When adding custom translations for tests using `I18n.backend.store_translations`,
we need to remove the custom translations at the end of each test to
prevent the custom translations from leaking to other tests.
This change prevents explicitly declaring each route that should be intercepted for chat drawer mode.
In theory all chat drawer routes should be intercepted from the main chat routes file and therefore we would only need to add new drawer routes directly within chat-drawer-router.js.
This change allows chat drawer users to edit channel settings and members without leaving drawer mode. If a channel is open within chat drawer and the user clicks the Channel name, it will load channel settings within the drawer.
This change allows the correct number of members to be added when creating a group direct message, based on the site setting chat_max_direct_message_users.
Previously we counted the current user within the max user limit and therefore the count was off by 1.
Before this fix we could only list messages of a thread if it was part of a `threading_enabled` channel or if the thread was set to `force`.
Due to our design of also using a thread id when this is just a chain of replies so we can switch from threading enabled to disabled at any time, we will allow `Chat:: ListChannelThreadMessages` to list the messages of any thread, the only important requirements are:
- having a thread id
- being able to access this thread
To allow this, this commit simply removes the check on `threading_enabled` or `force`.
Under some circumstances, the TextField component could trigger a `Assertion Failed: You attempted to update attrs on ..., but it had already been used previously in the same computation...` error, causing the Ember app to crash.
A few follup changes after changing to the chat footer split for drawer:
* Fixing a bug that stretched the unread indicator on mobile
* Minor style changes in hover/focus behaviour for chat drawer
* Repositioning of unread indicator so it has more space at the top of the footer
* Using the `c-unread-indicator` mixin
Was "removing" (rather not re-applying) the `[spoiler]` BBCode because we were testing the **whole** class of the `span`/`div` was `spoiled` but we added another class and thus broke this functionnality.
In order to fix this issue, the test to determine whether a `span`/`div` is a spoiler, now uses a regular expression to check whether the `class` **contains** the word `spoiled`.
Reference - https://meta.discourse.org/t/quoting-spoiler-text-doesnt-include-spoiler-tags-in-the-quote/170145
Adds a placeholder image + CTA in chat, for empty channel and DM lists.
On desktop with drawer mode, we split chat into tabs (like mobile).
---------
Co-authored-by: Joffrey JAFFEUX <j.jaffeux@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: David Battersby <info@davidbattersby.com>
Co-authored-by: Régis Hanol <regis@hanol.fr>
In this PR service objects were moved to Core https://github.com/discourse/discourse/pull/26506
However, ServiceRunner should be moved as well. Mostly for CI to run effortlessly without loading plugins.
Prior to this fix we had too logic to detect if a user is active or not:
- idle codepath on the frontend
- online user ids on the backend
The frontend solution is not very reliable, and both solution are just trying to be too smart. Making a lot of people questioning why they receive a notification sometimes and sometimes not. This commit removes all this logic and replaces it with a much more simpler logic:
- you can't receive notifications for channel you are actually watching
- we won't play a sound more than once every 3seconds
The `onNotification` signature is:
```
onNotification(data, siteSettings, user, appEvents)
```
And we were not passing `appEvents`.
Also explicitly inject `currentUser` in `chat-notification-manager` service.
We consider that you should always receive a notification sound when someone speaks directly with you in chat.
This commit also refactors the way we play audio in chat to make it simpler and throttle it to 3 seconds.
We also added a safeguard to ensure we won't play sounds for old messages, this case can happen when message bus is catching up the backlog (eg: in an inactive tab for example).
When users click a link that points to an existing group chat, we should reopen that chat instead of creating a new group chat so users can more easily continue ongoing conversations.
activeChannel is something we should use less and less as it could not exist, in this case we have the channel right here in the function so there's no reason to reach for `this.chat.activeChannel`.
Prior to this fix we wouldn't intercept it, and we also wouldn't handle it, which in result would cause us to handle as a full page interaction and open the full page chat even if you were in drawer mode.
When a user had the chat option "Show activity indicator in header" set to "all new messages", and they would get a reply to a thread they're part of, the chat icon in the header would not show the unread bubble indicator.
In order to fix this, the `ChatHeaderIconUnreadIndicator` component will now `showUnreadIndicator` whenever there is either one unread public channel or there are unread threads.
I only added a system spec for this very specific path because I don't want to slow down the whole suite to test for all the various combination of the `chat_header_indicator_preference` values.
Internal ref - t/128874
Not 100% sure why the changes in `PrettyText.format_for_email` raised this issue, but we were missing adding a link to the Discourse instance whenever we are replacing the elided part of a post with a link to either the post or the Discourse instance in the email.
Also reformated the specs using better variable names (sometimes a variable named `md` would contain some html) and used the `match_html` helper for all the tests.
Given this is currently buggy and we have the cancel button Im not sure this is actually necessary. I feel like it's adding a lot of noise of low value.
For now at least, it's better without it.
This commit reuses the existing codepath in desktop-notifications and make it available to use to chat.
primaryTab was too hard to test if not impossible in this service test, however isIdle and disabled notifications are correctly tested.
Prior to this change, only mentions would get a notification and a sound. This change will not create a notification for this case, but will play a sound. This is still respecting notification settings, not playing the sound when you are viewing the channel or not following it.
---------
Co-authored-by: Régis Hanol <regis@hanol.fr>
(experimental)
The initial implementation of glimmer topic-list and related components. Does not include new APIs and isn't compatible with existing customization. That's gonna come in future PRs.
Enabled by adding groups to `experimental_glimmer_topic_list_groups` setting.
Debouncing the audio was causing the audio to be lost sometimes, somewhat randomly. It's not supposed to be necessary.
The commit also refactors the code to async/await.
Prior to this fix we were using `topic.current_post_number` which is coming from the server side and represents the initial topic scroll position when initially rendered to the end user. However, this value is not dynamic and is not updated when the user scrolls, `topic.currentPost` is the dynamic equivalent.
No test as there are very low chances a test like this one based on scroll position, will be reliable over time.
