freeipa/install/po/README

Q: I've added a new source file, how do I make sure it's strings get translated?

A: Edit Makefile.in and add the source file to the appropriate *_POTFILES list.
   Then run "make update-po".

Q: How do I pick up new strings to translate from the source files after the
   source have been modified?

A: make update-po
   This regenerates the pot template file by scanning all the source files.
   Then the new strings are merged into each .po file from the new pot file.

Q: How do I just regenerate the pot template file without regenerating all the
   .po files?

A: make update-pot

Q: How do I add a new language for translation?

A: Edit the LINGUAS file and add the new language. Then run "make create-po".
   This will generate a new .po file for each language which doesn't have one
   yet. Be sure to add the new .po file(s) to the source code repository.  For
   certain languages, you may have to edit the Plurals line.  See:
   http://www.gnu.org/software/hello/manual/gettext/Plural-forms.html

Q: What files must be under source code control?

A: The files Makefile.in, LINGUAS control the build, they must be in the SCM.
   The *.pot and *.po files are used by translators, they must be in SCM so the
   translator can checkout out a .po files, add the translations, and then check
   the .po file back in.

   Be careful, .po files may be automatically updated when the source files
   change (or the .pot changes, usually the .pot file changes only as a result
   of rescanning the source files). This mean a .po file might be automatically
   updated while a translator has the file out for editing, all the caveats
   about SCM merging apply.

Q: Which are automatically generated and thus do not need to be in SCM?

A: The *.mo files are automatically generated on demand from their corresponding
   .po file. 

Q: What role does the .pot file play?

A: The .pot file is called a template file. It is generated by scanning all the
   source files (e.g. *.py *.c *.h) in the project using xgettext. xgettext
   locates every translatable string (e.g. strings marked with _()) and adds
   that string along with metadata about it's location to the .pot file. Thus
   the .pot file is a collection of every translatable string in the project. If
   you edit a source file and add a translatable string you will have to
   regenerate the .pot file in order to pick up the new string.

Q: What is the relationship between a .po file and the .pot file?

A: A .po file contains the translations for particular language. It derives from
   the .pot file. When the .pot file is updated with new strings to translate
   each .po will merge the new strings in. The .po file is where translators
   work providing translations for their language. Thus it's important the .po
   not be recreated from scratch and is kept in SCM, otherwise the translators
   work will be lost.

   Let's use an example for French, it's .po file will be fr.po.

   1)  Developer creates main.c with one translatable sting _("Begin").

   2)  Produce the .pot file by running xgettext on main.c

   3)  .pot file contains one msgid, "Begin" 

   4)  fr.po is created from the .pot file, it also contains one msgid, "Begin"

   5)  Translator edits fr.po and provide the French translation of "Begin".

   6)  Developer adds new translatable sting _("End") to main.c

   7)  Generate a new .pot file by running xgettext on main.c

   8)  .pot file contains two msgid's, "Begin", and "End"

   9)  fr.po is missing the new msgid in the .pot file, so the .pot is merged
       into fr.po by running msgmerge. This copies into fr.po the new "End" msgid
       but preserves the existing translations in fr.po (e.g. "Begin"). The fr.po
       will now have 2 msgid's one which is translated already (e.g. "Begin") and
       one that untranslated (e.g. "End").

   10) Sometime later the French translator comes back to see if he/she needs to
       add more translations to fr.po. They see there is a missing translation,
       they check fr.po out from SCM, add the missing translation, and then
       check fr.po back into SCM.

   This means at any given moment the set of .po files will have varying degrees
   of translation completeness. Because the .po files are merged when the source
   code files are updated existing translations are not lost. It also means a
   .po file which was fully translated may need new translations after a .pot
   update. It is permissible to have incomplete translations in a message
   catalog, at run time if a translation for a particular string is available in
   the message catalog the user will be presented with the string in their
   language. However if the string is not yet translated in the .po file then
   they just get the original string (typically in English).

Q: What are .mo files?

A: .mo files are the content of a .po file but in "machine" format for fast
   run time access (mo = Machine Object, po = Portable Object). .mo files are
   what gets installed along with the package. Think of a .po as a source file
   which is compiled into a object file for run time use.

Q: Why don't we use gettexize and autopoint?

A: Because the framework they produce is too limited. Specifically there is no
   way to pass the source language to xgettext when it scans a file. xgettext
   only knows how to automatically determine the language from the source files
   extension. However we have many files without extensions, thus we have to
   group all Python (et. al.) files together and run xgettext on every file *we*
   know to Python (because xgettext can't figure this out itself if there is no
   file extension). There is another added benefit of avoiding gettextize and
   autopoint, simplicity. Managing translations is complex and hard enough as it
   is, gettextize and autopoint adds another whole layer of complexity which
   just further obscures things.

Q: Who created the awful mess and who do I ask when things don't work as I
   expect or I have further questions?

A: John Dennis <jdennis@redhat.com>