From 8f23c1a8d2852fb1e70fff7aa66e50d538d3de8a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joshua Shanks Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2024 09:24:42 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] Remove duplicate entry in TSC_SUMMARY (#1146) Signed-off-by: Joshua Shanks Signed-off-by: Kuba Martin Co-authored-by: Kuba Martin --- TSC_SUMMARY.md | 62 -------------------------------------------------- 1 file changed, 62 deletions(-) diff --git a/TSC_SUMMARY.md b/TSC_SUMMARY.md index d4ae0d868c..7f35c1b304 100644 --- a/TSC_SUMMARY.md +++ b/TSC_SUMMARY.md @@ -116,68 +116,6 @@ Decision: Quick unanimous yes With that, our time’s up. We’ll convene again next week to discuss more items. - -## 2023-12-05 - -### Attendees: -- Igor Savchenko ([@DiscyDel](https://github.com/DicsyDel)) -- Marcin Wyszynski ([@marcinwyszynski](https://github.com/marcinwyszynski)) -- Roger Simms ([@allofthesepeople](https://github.com/allofthesepeople)) -- Roni Frantchi ([@roni-frantchi](https://github.com/roni-frantchi)) - -### Absent -- Yevgeniy Brikman ([@brikis98](https://github.com/brikis98)) -- Omry Hay ([@omry-hay](https://github.com/omry-hay)) - -### Agenda - -#### Decide if we are changing the default registry namespace to opentofu -Decision: Quick unanimous yes - -#### RFC/Issues reviewed - -1. [Issue: UI for registry](https://github.com/opentofu/opentofu/issues/964) - - **Discussion** - - Roni thinks it should be a priority to have some UI there, especially as with the selected brew like design there’s convenient way to know which packages are supported by OpenTofu, and as we try to build the OpenTofu brand we cannot be sending people to have a look at HTF for modules/providers and docs (and be disappointed if some are missing and not submitted yet). - - Igor thinks it’s a defocus for the core team and would rather not prioritize it. Disclosure: He is working on a library.tf project meant to serve as Terraform/OpenTofu registry. He thinks the community will benefit from one non-associated registry that would hold both Terraform and OpenTofu as well as other IaC. - - Roger thought a UI/docs via the CLI would be a better way to go at it - - Marcin had no strong opinion but also thought it is not a priority - - **Vote**: Should we prioritize any registry ui/doc solution this Q? - - Roni: Yes - - Everyone else: No - - **Decision**: Not a prio right now, but as most votes actually suggested some solutions, TSC would like to see some suggested RFCs for the above options to be submitted, and then we can re-examine - -2. [RFC: Client-side state encryption](https://github.com/opentofu/opentofu/issues/874) - - **Discussion** - Everyone agrees it should be accepted to as a highly requested feature, differentiating feature. @Marcin Wyszynski felt this is not the long term solution he would have wanted to see (don’t store secrets in state), but more upsides to having that intermediate solution now than not) - - **Vote**: Should this be accepted as a higher priority this Q? - - Everyone: Yes - - **Decision:** Accept RFC an pull up - -3. [Issue: Support OpenTofu in the VS Code Language Server](https://github.com/opentofu/opentofu/issues/970) - - **Discussion** - - Marcin thinks at this point it’s an unnecessary duplication and the language server would work just the same for OTF/HTF - - Roni says that even if it doesn’t, it’s just a nice to have - - Roger and Igor no strong opinion but think it is not a priority as well - - **Vote**: Should this issue be accepted as a higher priority this Q? - - Everyone: No - - **Decision**: We may accept the RFC, but not have core team follow up on it - -4. [PR: Implement gunzipbase64](https://github.com/opentofu/opentofu/pull/799) - - **Discussion** - Everyone agrees long term we would want OpenTofu to have custom function extensions/reuse as there’s gonna be a lot of these, but seeing it is an inverse of an existing function while its counterparts also have those, we should pursue. - - **Vote**: Should this PR be accepted? - Everyone: Yes - - **Decision**: Accept PR - -5. [PR: Fix filesystem state backend to be fast](https://github.com/opentofu/opentofu/pull/579) - - **Vote**: Should this PR be accepted? - - Everyone: Yes - - Decision: Accept PR - -With that, our time’s up. We’ll convene again next week to discuss more items. - - ## 2023-11-02 ### Attendees: - Igor Savchenko ([@DiscyDel](https://github.com/DicsyDel))