This makes all the computed stuff "just work" since HIL uses the same
computed sentinel value (string UUID) and the type differentiates it
from a regular string.
The map output from the module "mod" loses the computed value from the
template when we validate. If the "extra" field is removed from the map,
the validation fails earlier with map "does not have any elements so
cannot determine type".
Apply will work, because the computed value will exist in the map.
terraform: more specific resource references
terraform: outputs need to know about the new reference format
terraform: resources w/o a config still have a referencable name
This makes the old graph also prune orphan outputs in modules.
This will fix shadow graph errors such as #9905 since the old graph will
also behave correctly in these scenarios.
Luckily, because orphan outputs don't rely on anything, we were able to
simply use the same transformer!
Fixes#9920
This was an issue caught with the shadow graph. Self references in
provisioners were causing a self-edge on destroy apply graphs.
We need to explicitly check that we're not creating an edge to ourself.
This is also how the reference transformer works.
Fixes a shadow graph error found during usage.
The new apply graph was only adding module variables that referenced
data that existed _in the graph_. This isn't a valid optimization since
the data it is referencing may be in the state with no diff, and
therefore available but not in the graph.
This just removes that optimization logic, which causes no failing
tests. It also adds a test that exposes the bug if we had the pruning
logic.
Found via a shadow graph failure:
Provider aliases weren't being configured by the new apply graph.
This was caused by the transform that attaches configs to provider nodes
not being able to handle aliases and therefore not attaching a config.
Added a test to this and fixed it.
Fixes#9444
This appears to be a regression from 0.7.0, but there were no tests
covering it so we missed it and changed the behavior at some point! Oh
no.
This PR make the ordering of multi-var access: `resource.name.*.attr`
consistent: it is the ordering of the count, not the lexical ordering of
the value. This allows behavior where two lists are indexed by count
index and can be assumed to be related (for example user data for an aws
instance, as shown in the above referenced issue).
Two new context tests added to cover this case.
