Previously we handled all of the config sources directly within the main
function. We're going to make CLI config loading more complex shortly, so
having this encapsulated in its own function will avoid creating even more
clutter inside the main function.
Along the way here we also switch from using native Go "error" to using
tfdiags.Diagnostics, so that we can potentially issue warnings here too
in future, and so that we can return multiple errors.
We require that each "credentials" block has a valid hostname and that
there be no more than one "credentials_helper" block.
There are some more sophisticated validations we could do here, such as
checking if the same host is declared more than once, but since this
config handling will be rewritten to use HCL2 in the near future, and this
sort of check is easier to do in the HCL2 API, we just check the basic
stuff for now and plan to revisit later.
Either the environment variable TF_PLUGIN_CACHE_DIR or a setting in the
CLI config file (~/.terraformrc on Unix) allow opting in to the plugin
caching behavior.
This is opt-in because for new users we don't want to pollute their system
with extra directories they don't know about. By opting in to caching, the
user is assuming the responsibility to occasionally prune the cache over
time as older plugins become stale and unused.
Previously we did plugin discovery in the main package, but as we move
towards versioned plugins we need more information available in order to
resolve plugins, so we move this responsibility into the command package
itself.
For the moment this is just preserving the existing behavior as long as
there are only internal and unversioned plugins present. This is the
final state for provisioners in 0.10, since we don't want to support
versioned provisioners yet. For providers this is just a checkpoint along
the way, since further work is required to apply version constraints from
configuration and support additional plugin search directories.
The automatic plugin discovery behavior is not desirable for tests because
we want to mock the plugins there, so we add a new backdoor for the tests
to use to skip the plugin discovery and just provide their own mock
implementations. Most of this diff is thus noisy rework of the tests to
use this new mechanism.
This allows the use case where installation of a plugin can simply say
to add `$GOPATH/bin/foo` to your terraformrc and the user can do that
verbatim. Additionally terraformrc files become portable for certain
environments which are self-contained.
I was hesitant at first about this because it diverges the syntax a bit
from our standard interpolation syntax. However, due to the special
nature of terraformrc and the strong use cases cited I'm okay with this.
- Currently the disable_checkpoint setting from $HOME/.terraformrc is never
respsected due to:
-- The runCheckpoint go routine being fired off prior to loading configuration
-- The config.Merge method not actually merging in the c2s settings
A user has at some point explicitly specified in .terraformrc that
overriding should take place (unlike PATH based overrides), so this
should log as INFO rather than WARN.
It is still of value for debugging purposes, however!
It is currently very easy to miss that a provider/provisioner has a
local override in your .terraformrc, leading to unexpected behaviour
that can be difficult to debug as no information is output about the
overrides.
This replaces this plugin system with the extracted hashicorp/go-plugin
library.
This doesn't introduce any new features such as binary flattening but
opens us up to that a lot more easily and removes a lot of code from TF
in favor of the upstream lib.
This will introduce a protocol change that will cause all existing
plugins to have to be recompiled to work properly. There is no actual
API changes so they just have to recompile, but it is technically
backwards incompatible.
Docker's API is huge and only a small subset is currently implemented,
but this is expected to grow over time. Currently it's enough to
satisfy the use cases of probably 95% of Docker users.
I'm preparing this initial pull request as a preview step for feedback.
My ideal scenario would be to develop this within a branch in the main
repository; the more eyes and testing and pitching in on the code, the
better (this would avoid a merge request-to-the-merge-request scenario,
as I figure this will be built up over the longer term, even before
a merge into master).
Unit tests do not exist yet. Right now I've just been focused on getting
initial functionality ported over. I've been testing each option
extensively via the Docker inspect capabilities.
This code (C)2014-2015 Akamai Technologies, Inc. <opensource@akamai.com>
