Use the ResourceState.Provider field to store the full name of the
provider used during apply. This field is only used when a resource is
removed from the config, and will allow that resource to be removed by
the exact same provider with which it was created.
Modify the locations which might accept the alue of the
ResourceState.Provider field to detect that the name is resolved.
This turned out to be a big messy commit, since the way providers are
referenced is tightly coupled throughout the code. That starts to unify
how providers are referenced, using the format output node Name method.
Add a new field to the internal resource data types called
ResolvedProvider. This is set by a new setter method SetProvider when a
resource is connected to a provider during graph creation. This allows
us to later lookup the provider instance a resource is connected to,
without requiring it to have the same module path.
The InitProvider context method now takes 2 arguments, one if the
provider type and the second is the full name of the provider. While the
provider type could still be parsed from the full name, this makes it
more explicit and, and changes to the name format won't effect this
code.
Fixes#10440
This updates the behavior of "apply" resources to depend on the
destroy versions of their dependencies.
We make an exception to this behavior when the "apply" resource is CBD.
This is odd and not 100% correct, but it mimics the behavior of the
legacy graphs and avoids us having to do major core work to support the
100% correct solution.
I'll explain this in examples...
Given the following configuration:
resource "null_resource" "a" {
count = "${var.count}"
}
resource "null_resource" "b" {
triggers { key = "${join(",", null_resource.a.*.id)}" }
}
Assume we've successfully created this configuration with count = 2.
When going from count = 2 to count = 1, `null_resource.b` should wait
for `null_resource.a.1` to destroy.
If it doesn't, then it is a race: depending when we interpolate the
`triggers.key` attribute of `null_resource.b`, we may get 1 value or 2.
If `null_resource.a.1` is destroyed, we'll get 1. Otherwise, we'll get
2. This was the root cause of #10440
In the legacy graphs, `null_resource.b` would depend on the destruction
of any `null_resource.a` (orphans, tainted, anything!). This would
ensure proper ordering. We mimic that behavior here.
The difference is CBD. If `null_resource.b` has CBD enabled, then the
ordering **in the legacy graph** becomes:
1. null_resource.b (create)
2. null_resource.b (destroy)
3. null_resource.a (destroy)
In this case, the update would always have 2 values for `triggers.key`,
even though we were destroying a resource later! This scenario required
two `terraform apply` operations.
This is what the CBD check is for in this PR. We do this to mimic the
behavior of the legacy graph.
The correct solution to do one day is to allow splat references
(`null_resource.a.*.id`) to happen in parallel and only read up to to
the `count` amount in the state. This requires some fairly significant
work close to the 0.8 release date, so we can defer this to later and
adopt the 0.7.x behavior for now.
Fixes#10338
The destruction step for a resource was included the deposed resources
for _all_ resources with that name (ignoring the "index"). For example:
`aws_instance.foo.0` was including destroying deposed for
`aws_instance.foo.1`.
This changes the config to the deposed transformer to properly include
that index.
This change includes a larger change of changing `stateId` to include
the index. This affected more parts but was ultimately the issue in
question.
Fixes#10313
The new graph wasn't properly recording resource dependencies to a
specific index of itself. For example: `foo.bar.2` depending on
`foo.bar.0` wasn't shown in the state when it should've been.
This adds a test to verify this and fixes it.
This doesn't cause any practical issues as far as I'm aware (couldn't
get any test to fail), but caused shadow errors since it wasn't matching
the prior behavior.
This enables the new apply graph's resource node to apply data sources.
Data sources appear to only be tested for "refresh" which is likely
where they're set but they've also been implemented (not my code, not
trying to edit code) within the "apply" operation as well.
This adds an apply test to ensure data sources work, and then modifies
the new apply node to support data sources.
