To avoid chasing down issues like #11635 I'm proposing we disable the
shadow graph for end users now that we have merged in all the new
graphs. I've kept it around and default-on for tests so that we can use
it to test new features as we build them. I think it'll still have value
going forward but I don't want to hold us for making it work 100% with
all of Terraform at all times.
I propose backporting this to 0-8-stable, too.
Fixes#11349
I tracked this bug back to the early 0.7 days so this has been around a
really long time. I wanted to confirm that this wasn't introduced by any
new graph changes and it appears to predate all of that. I couldn't find
a single 0.7.x release where this worked, and I didn't want to go back
to 0.6.x since it was pre-vendoring.
The test case shows the logic the best, but the basic idea is: for
collections that go to zero elements, the "RequiresNew" sameness check
should be ignored, since the new diff can choose to not have that at all
in the diff.
This adds a Meta field (similar to InstanceState.Meta) to InstanceDiff.
This allows providers to store arbitrary k/v data as part of a diff and
have it persist through to the Apply. This will be used by helper/schema
for timeout storage being done by @catsby.
The type here is `map[string]interface{}`. A couple notes:
* **Not using `string`**: The Meta field of InstanceState is a string
value. We've learned that forcing things to strings is bad. Let's
just allow types.
* **Primitives only**: Even though it is type `interface{}`, it must
be able to cleanly pass the go-plugin RPC barrier as well as be
encoded to a file as Gob. Given these constraints, the value must
only comprise of primitive types and collections. No structs,
functions, channels, etc.
Read state would assume that having a reader meant there should be a
valid state. Check for an empty file and return ErrNoState to
differentiate a bad file from an empty one.
This disables the computed value check for `count` during the validation
pass. This enables partial support for #3888 or #1497: as long as the
value is non-computed during the plan, complex values will work in
counts.
**Notably, this allows data source values to be present in counts!**
The "count" value can be disabled during validation safely because we
can treat it as if any field that uses `count.index` is computed for
validation. We then validate a single instance (as if `count = 1`) just
to make sure all required fields are set.
