Commit Graph

65 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
James Bardin
95f30451d9 get rid of EvalEarlyExitError
This was mostly unused now, since we no longer needed to interrupt a
series of eval node executions.

The exception was the stopHook, which is still used to halt execution
when there's an interrupt. Since interrupting execution should not
complete successfully, we use a normal opaque error to halt everything,
and return it to the UI.

We can work on coalescing or hiding these if necessary in a separate PR.
2020-10-28 14:40:30 -04:00
James Bardin
988059d533 make GraphNodeExecutable return diagnostics 2020-10-28 13:47:04 -04:00
James Bardin
c81fd833bb add diags to eval_state 2020-10-28 12:23:03 -04:00
James Bardin
b42aad5856 add diags to eval_diff 2020-10-28 11:46:07 -04:00
James Bardin
477111e6b6 change apply Eval methods to use diags 2020-10-27 18:16:28 -04:00
James Bardin
a32028aeed evaluate vars and outputs during import
Outputs were not being evaluated during import, because it was not added
to the walk filter.

Remove any unnecessary walk filters from all the Execute nodes.
2020-10-06 17:22:50 -04:00
Kristin Laemmert
90588c036b
terraform: minor cleanup from EvalTree() refactor (#26429)
* Split node_resource_abstract.go into two files, putting
NodeAbstractResourceInstance methods in their own file - it was getting
large enough to be tricky for (my) human eyeballs.

* un-exported the functions that were created as part of the EvalTree()
refactor; they did not need to be public.
2020-10-01 08:12:10 -04:00
Kristin Laemmert
0ac53ae3ed terraform: remove deprecated or unused Eval() bits 2020-09-29 15:01:24 -04:00
Kristin Laemmert
ab5bf50fc3 terrafrom: create NodeAbstractResource ReadResourceInstanceState
function

The original EvalReadState node is used only by `NodeAbstractResource`s,
so I've created a new method on NodeAbstractResource which does the same
thing as EvalReadState. When the EvalNode refactor project is complete,
EvalReadState will be removed entirely.
2020-09-29 13:24:21 -04:00
Kristin Laemmert
55d58cb8be
terraform: NodeDestroyResourceInstance refactor (#26246)
* terraform: remove unused eval node

* add UpdateStateHook function to replace EvalUpdateStateHook

* early exit error isn't

* terraform: NodeDestroyResourceInstance refactor

This PR refactor's NodeDestroyResourceInstance EvalTree() into an
Execute() node. EvalRequireState and evalWriteEmptyState were used only
by this node, and they have been removed in favor of straight code.

There are still many calls to someEvalNode.Eval() in NodeDestroyResourceInstance: I plan on refactoring the remaining EvalTree()s before tacking those Eval()s (all of which are used by many graph nodes)

I've added a new function, UpdateStateHook, that is effectively the same
as EvalUpdateStateHook. The latter will be removed when the larger
EvalNode refactor project is complete.
2020-09-16 11:33:55 -04:00
James Bardin
a6dffa89a3 cleanup unused CBD code
Remove the check for CreateBeforeDestroyOverride which can't happen in a
destroy node.

Remove the unnecessary GraphNodeAttachDestroyer interface, since we
don't use it now that plans can record the create+destroy order.
2020-09-16 11:14:36 -04:00
James Bardin
2ea921f915 destroy nodes must rely on the state cbd status
When there is only a destroy node, there is no descendent to check for
"forced CBD", so we can only rely on the state to verify.
2020-09-16 09:52:48 -04:00
James Bardin
ee8cc627a0 don't store an entire Resource in each Instance
The AbstractResourceInstance type was storing the entire Resource from
the state, when it only needs the actual instance state. This would
cause resources to consume memory on the order of n^2, where n in the
number of instances of the resource.

Rather than attaching the entire resource state, which includes copying
each individual instance, only attach the ResourceInstance state, and
extract out the provider address from the Resource.
2020-07-10 13:35:13 -04:00
James Bardin
8850d787f4 add evalWriteEmptyState for data source removal 2020-05-13 13:58:11 -04:00
James Bardin
be20a7941d remove EvalReadDataApply
EvalReadDataApply was all dead code, as it was only using during delete
and simply set the state to nil.
2020-05-13 13:58:11 -04:00
James Bardin
0dcca1bc37 make the root node a nodeCloseModule for root
Replace the graphNodeRoot for the main graph with a nodeCloseModule for
the root module. USe a new transformer as well, so as to not change any
behavior of DynamicExpand graphs.

Closing out the root module like we do with sub modules means we no
longer need the OrphanResourceTransformer, or the NodeDestroyResource.
The old resource destroy logic has mostly moved into the instance nodes,
and the remaining resource node was just for cleanup, which need to be
done again by the module since there isn't always a NodeDestroyResource
to be evaluated.

The more-correct state caused a few tests to fail, which need to be
cleaned up to match the state without empty resource husks.
2020-04-02 16:00:36 -04:00
James Bardin
026a45a390 remove abstract resource node from destroy node
NodeDestroyResource does not require a provider, and to avoid this a
temporary GraphNodeNoProvider was used to differentiate it from other
resource nodes. We can now de-couple the destroy node from the abstract
resource which was adding the ProvidedBy method, and remove the
NoProvider method.
2020-04-02 16:00:35 -04:00
James Bardin
74d85aa956 Add Path to more nodes that require it. 2020-03-25 17:03:06 -04:00
James Bardin
0b85eeab38 NewNodeAbstractResource accepts a ResourceConfig
Use the new addrs type here.

Also remove the uniqueMap from the config transformer. We enforce
uniqueness during config loading, and this is more likely to have false
positives due to stringification than anything.
2020-03-25 17:03:06 -04:00
James Bardin
d905b990a5 s/GraphNodeResource/GraphNodeConfigResource/
Make the interface name reflect the new return type of the method.
Remove the confusingly named and unused ResourceAddress method from the
resource nodes as well.
2020-03-16 11:16:23 -04:00
James Bardin
fae5f9958d remove GraphNodeModuleInstance from Resource types
Remove the requirement for most *Resource types to be a
GraphNodeModuleInstance, ensuring that they never call ctx.Path while
being evaluated. This gets rid of most of the direct need for the Path
method currently implemented by NodeResourceAbstract, leaving the
provider and schema related calls for a subsequent PR.
2020-03-10 20:22:22 -04:00
James Bardin
654e880bb8
Merge pull request #24084 from hashicorp/jbardin/cbd-instance-state
Add CreateBeforeDestroy to instance state
2020-03-09 13:16:29 -04:00
Paddy
e6592dc710
Add support for provider metadata to modules. (#22583)
Implement a new provider_meta block in the terraform block of modules, allowing provider-keyed metadata to be communicated from HCL to provider binaries.

Bundled in this change for minimal protocol version bumping is the addition of markdown support for attribute descriptions and the ability to indicate when an attribute is deprecated, so this information can be shown in the schema dump.

Co-authored-by: Paul Tyng <paul@paultyng.net>
2020-03-05 16:53:24 -08:00
James Bardin
691bb6b907 use CreateBeforeDestroy from state
If the resource was stored as CreateBeforeDestroy, use the same ordering
regardless.

This reversal will be taken care if more cleanly in state-only destroys,
and with less risk. Don't use this commit as-is.
2020-02-13 21:09:59 -05:00
James Bardin
4aa8a1cece Add GraphNodeNoProvider to skip adding a providers
While the NodeDestroyResource type should not be a
GraphNodeProviderConsumer, we're going to avoid uncovering more hidden
behavior by explicitly skipping provider creation and connections in the
provider transformers.

This should be removed when more in-depth testing can be done during a
major release cycle.
2020-01-10 16:28:44 -05:00
James Bardin
a6cdfad590 NodeDestroyResource needs to be referencable
The change in #23696 removed the NodeAbstractResource methods from the
NodeDestroyResource type, in order to prevent other resource behaviors,
like requesting a provider.

While this node type is not directly referenced, it was implicitly
ordered against the module cleanup by virtue of being a resource node.

Since there's no good entry point to test this ordering at the moment,
2020-01-10 12:52:01 -05:00
James Bardin
414cbbe808 NodeDestroyResource does not need a provider
The resource cleanup node does not need a provider. We can't directly
remove the ProvidedBy method, but this node only needs to be eval-able
so we can remove all the NodeAbstractResource methods at once.
2019-12-16 17:55:49 -05:00
Martin Atkins
2eea07750a core: Clean up resource states when they are orphaned
We previously had mechanisms to clean up only individual instance states,
leaving behind empty resource husks in the state after they were all
destroyed.

This takes care of it in the "orphan" case. It does not yet do it in the
"terraform destroy" or "terraform plan -destroy" cases because we don't
have anywhere to record in the plan that we're actually destroying and so
the resource configurations should be ignored and _everything_ should be
cleaned. We'll let the state be not-quite-empty in that case for now,
since it doesn't really hurt; cleaning up orphans is the main case because
the state will live on afterwards and so leftover cruft will accumulate
over the course of many changes.
2018-10-16 19:14:11 -07:00
Martin Atkins
334c6f1c2c core: Be more explicit in how we handle create_before_destroy
Previously our handling of create_before_destroy -- and of deposed objects
in particular -- was rather "implicit" and spread over various different
subsystems. We'd quietly just destroy every deposed object during a
destroy operation, without any user-visible plan to do so.

Here we make things more explicit by tracking each deposed object
individually by its pseudorandomly-allocated key. There are two different
mechanisms at play here, building on the same concepts:

- During a replace operation with create_before_destroy, we *pre-allocate*
  a DeposedKey to use for the prior object in the "apply" node and then
  pass that exact id to the destroy node, ensuring that we only destroy
  the single object we planned to destroy. In the happy path here the
  user never actually sees the allocated deposed key because we use it and
  then immediately destroy it within the same operation. However, that
  destroy may fail, which brings us to the second mechanism:

- If any deposed objects are already present in state during _plan_, we
  insert a destroy change for them into the plan so that it's explicit to
  the user that we are going to destroy these additional objects, and then
  create an individual graph node for each one in DiffTransformer.

The main motivation here is to be more careful in how we handle these
destroys so that from a user's standpoint we never destroy something
without the user knowing about it ahead of time.

However, this new organization also hopefully makes the code itself a
little easier to follow because the connection between the create and
destroy steps of a Replace is reprseented in a single place (in
DiffTransformer) and deposed instances each have their own explicit graph
node rather than being secretly handled as part of the main instance-level
graph node.
2018-10-16 19:14:11 -07:00
Martin Atkins
6fd82ef97e core: Split Replace changes into separate Delete/Create changes
Since we do our deletes using a separate graph node from all of the other
actions, and a "Replace" change implies both a delete _and_ a create, we
need to pretend at apply time that a single replace change was actually
two separate changes.

This will also early-exit eval if a destroy node finds a non-Delete change
or if an apply node finds a Delete change. These should not happen in
practice because we leave these nodes out of the graph when they are not
needed for the given action, but we do this here for robustness so as not
to have an invisible dependency between the graph builder and the eval
phase.
2018-10-16 19:14:11 -07:00
Martin Atkins
235f582ae5 core: Re-implement EvalReadDataApply against new provider interface 2018-10-16 19:14:11 -07:00
Martin Atkins
3d86dc51e0 core: Re-implement EvalReadDiff for the new plan types
This also includes passing in the provider schema to a few more EvalNodes
that were expecting it but not getting it, in order to be able to
successfully test the implementation of EvalReadDiff here.
2018-10-16 19:14:11 -07:00
Martin Atkins
44bc7519a6 terraform: More wiring in of new provider types
This doesn't actually work yet, but it builds and then panics in a pretty
satisfying way.
2018-10-16 19:12:54 -07:00
James Bardin
16df9c37cf first step in core provider type replacement
Chaange ResourceProvider to providers.Interface starting from the
context, and fix all type errors.

This only replaced some of method calls directly applicable to the
providers themselves. The resource methods will follow.
2018-10-16 19:11:09 -07:00
Martin Atkins
a3403f2766 terraform: Ugly huge change to weave in new State and Plan types
Due to how often the state and plan types are referenced throughout
Terraform, there isn't a great way to switch them out gradually. As a
consequence, this huge commit gets us from the old world to a _compilable_
new world, but still has a large number of known test failures due to
key functionality being stubbed out.

The stubs here are for anything that interacts with providers, since we
now need to do the follow-up work to similarly replace the old
terraform.ResourceProvider interface with its replacement in the new
"providers" package. That work, along with work to fix the remaining
failing tests, will follow in subsequent commits.

The aim here was to replace all references to terraform.State and its
downstream types with states.State, terraform.Plan with plans.Plan,
state.State with statemgr.State, and switch to the new implementations of
the state and plan file formats. However, due to the number of times those
types are used, this also ended up affecting numerous other parts of core
such as terraform.Hook, the backend.Backend interface, and most of the CLI
commands.

Just as with 5861dbf3fc49b19587a31816eb06f511ab861bb4 before, I apologize
in advance to the person who inevitably just found this huge commit while
spelunking through the commit history.
2018-10-16 19:11:09 -07:00
Martin Atkins
6bbfbab93e core: Produce correct references for destroy nodes
Prior to the introduction of our "addrs" package, we represented destroy
nodes as a special kind of address string ending in ".destroy" or
".destroy-cbd".

Using references to resolve these dependencies is a strange idea to begin
with, since these are not user-visible addresses, but rather than refactor
that now we instead have these weird pseudo-address types ResourcePhase
and ResourceInstancePhase that correspond go those weird address suffixes,
thus restoring the prior behavior.

In future we should rework this so that destroy node edges are not handled
as references at all, and instead handled as part of
DestroyEdgeTransformer where there's better context for implementing this
logic and it can be maintained and tested in a single place.
2018-10-16 18:49:20 -07:00
Martin Atkins
3e55c4e72b Revert "destroy nodes can't be referenced directly"
This reverts commit e708d4ebe9b2f571183250ab79ac217ae9498fcc.
2018-10-16 18:49:20 -07:00
James Bardin
f8b77030db destroy nodes can't be referenced directly
Destroy nodes were being referenced by their regular paths, which was
causing cycles in the graphs. Destroy nodes can't be referenced directly
in any way, so override the inherited method for a referenceable address.
2018-10-16 18:48:28 -07:00
Martin Atkins
c82e3ec92f core: even more nil checks to catch missing objects
These are all things that ought to be present in normal use but can end up
being nil in incorrect tests. Test debugging is simpler if these things
return errors gracefully, rather than crashing.
2018-10-16 18:46:46 -07:00
Martin Atkins
c937c06a03 terraform: ugly huge change to weave in new HCL2-oriented types
Due to how deeply the configuration types go into Terraform Core, there
isn't a great way to switch out to HCL2 gradually. As a consequence, this
huge commit gets us from the old state to a _compilable_ new state, but
does not yet attempt to fix any tests and has a number of known missing
parts and bugs. We will continue to iterate on this in forthcoming
commits, heading back towards passing tests and making Terraform
fully-functional again.

The three main goals here are:
- Use the configuration models from the "configs" package instead of the
  older models in the "config" package, which is now deprecated and
  preserved only to help us write our migration tool.
- Do expression inspection and evaluation using the functionality of the
  new "lang" package, instead of the Interpolator type and related
  functionality in the main "terraform" package.
- Represent addresses of various objects using types in the addrs package,
  rather than hand-constructed strings. This is not critical to support
  the above, but was a big help during the implementation of these other
  points since it made it much more explicit what kind of address is
  expected in each context.

Since our new packages are built to accommodate some future planned
features that are not yet implemented (e.g. the "for_each" argument on
resources, "count"/"for_each" on modules), and since there's still a fair
amount of functionality still using old-style APIs, there is a moderate
amount of shimming here to connect new assumptions with old, hopefully in
a way that makes it easier to find and eliminate these shims later.

I apologize in advance to the person who inevitably just found this huge
commit while spelunking through the commit history.
2018-10-16 18:46:46 -07:00
James Bardin
3977fe8b2d write provider to state for refresh nodes
and update the test state strings
2017-11-07 21:05:28 -05:00
James Bardin
b79adeae02 save resolved providers for resources to state
Use the ResourceState.Provider field to store the full name of the
provider used during apply. This field is only used when a resource is
removed from the config, and will allow that resource to be removed by
the exact same provider with which it was created.

Modify the locations which might accept the alue of the
ResourceState.Provider field to detect that the name is resolved.
2017-11-07 13:09:36 -05:00
James Bardin
a14fd0344c WIP reference providers by full name
This turned out to be a big messy commit, since the way providers are
referenced is tightly coupled throughout the code. That starts to unify
how providers are referenced, using the format output node Name method.

Add a new field to the internal resource data types called
ResolvedProvider. This is set by a new setter method SetProvider when a
resource is connected to a provider during graph creation. This allows
us to later lookup the provider instance a resource is connected to,
without requiring it to have the same module path.

The InitProvider context method now takes 2 arguments, one if the
provider type and the second is the full name of the provider. While the
provider type could still be parsed from the full name, this makes it
more explicit and, and changes to the name format won't effect this
code.
2017-11-02 15:00:06 -04:00
Mitchell Hashimoto
757217b91f
terraform: destroy resource should depend on destroy-time prov deps 2017-02-17 13:13:44 -08:00
Mitchell Hashimoto
a765740827
terraform: CBD destroy nodes should not advertise themselves as normal 2017-02-07 11:49:50 -08:00
Mitchell Hashimoto
d3df7874d5
terraform: introduce EvalApplyPre so that PreApply is called even for
destroy provisioners.
2017-01-20 20:36:53 -08:00
Mitchell Hashimoto
85cb3a16b0
terraform: on destroy prov failure, don't taint and preserve state 2017-01-20 18:26:41 -08:00
Mitchell Hashimoto
e9f6c9c429
terraform: run destroy provisioners on destroy 2017-01-20 18:07:51 -08:00
Mitchell Hashimoto
95239a7fe6
terraform: when promoting non-CBD to CBD, mark the config as such
This brings the change for the  new graph. See #10455
2016-12-02 09:46:42 -05:00
Mitchell Hashimoto
3b2282ca57
terraform: Destroy node should only include deposed for specific index
Fixes #10338

The destruction step for a resource was included the deposed resources
for _all_ resources with that name (ignoring the "index"). For example:
`aws_instance.foo.0` was including destroying deposed for
`aws_instance.foo.1`.

This changes the config to the deposed transformer to properly include
that index.

This change includes a larger change of changing `stateId` to include
the index. This affected more parts but was ultimately the issue in
question.
2016-11-29 09:16:18 -08:00