In `helper/schema` we already makes a distinction between `Default`
which is always applied and `InputDefault` which is displayed to the
user for an empty field.
But for variables we just have `Default` which is treated like
`InputDefault`. This changes it to _not_ prompt the user for a value
when the variable declaration includes a default.
Treating this as a UX bugfix and the "don't prompt for variables w/
defaults set" behavior as the originally expected behavior we were
failing to honor.
Added an already-passing test to verify and cover the `helper/schema`
behavior.
Perhaps down the road we can add a `input_default` attribute to
variables to allow similar behavior to `helper/schema` in variables, but
for now just sticking with the fix.
Fixes#2592
Allows target dependencies to be properly calculated across module
boundaries, fixing scenarios where a target depends on something inside
a module, but the contents of the module are not included in the
targeted resources.
fixes#1858
Had to handle a lot of implicit leaning on a few properties of the old
representation:
* Old representation allowed plain strings to be treated as lists
without problem (i.e. shoved into strings.Split), now strings need to
be checked whether they are a list before they are treated as one
(i.e. shoved into StringList(s).Slice()).
* Tested behavior of 0 and 1 length lists in formatlist() was a side
effect of the representation. Needs to be special cased now to
maintain the behavior.
* Found a pretty old context test failure that was wrong in several
different ways. It's covered by TestContext2Apply_multiVar so I
removed it.
Because CBD now runs after a RootTransformer, it's now operating on a
graph that _may_ have had a graphNodeRoot added to it (a noop node whose
only purpose is to be a root).
CBD includes a step that tells the destroy node to depend on any parents
of the create node. When one of those parents was "root", this was
causing the destroy node to depend on "root", making it cease to be an
actual root node.
Because graphNodeRoot is a singleton, the follow-up RootTransformer was
not sufficient to slap another root on top - it wasn't being seen as a
fresh node, so edges were just accumulating, and we ended up in a state
with "no roots".
refs #1903 (not sure if this will fix all the "no root found" cases, or
just the one I bumped into)
fixes#1947
Root cause was a bad edge being made by the CBD transform going from the
flattened destroy node to the unflattened create node, which was no
longer in the graph. The destroy node therefore had a dependency that
could never be satisfied, which locked up the walk.
Adds the ability to target resources within modules, like:
module.mymod.aws_instance.foo
And the ability to target all resources inside a module, like:
module.mymod
Closes#1434
The `TargetTransform` was dropping provisioner nodes, which caused graph
validation to fail with messages about uninitialized provisioners when a
`terraform destroy` was attempted.
This was because `destroy` flops the dependency calculation to try and
address any nodes in the graph that "depend on" the target node. But we
still need to keep the provisioner node in the graph.
Here we switch the strategy for filtering nodes to only drop
addressable, non-targeted nodes. This should prevent us from having to
whitelist nodes to keep in the future.
closes#1541
Most CBD-related cycles include destroy nodes, and destroy nodes were
all being pruned from the graph before staring the Validate walk.
In practice this meant that we had scenarios that would error out with
graph cycles on Apply that _seemed_ fine during Plan.
This introduces a Verbose option to the GraphBuilder that tells it to
generate a "worst-case" graph. Validate sets this to true so that cycle
errors will always trigger at this step if they're going to happen.
(This Verbose option will be exposed as a CLI flag to `terraform graph`
in a second incoming PR.)
refs #1651
Adds an "alias" field to the provider which allows creating multiple instances
of a provider under different names. This provides support for configurations
such as multiple AWS providers for different regions. In each resource, the
provider can be set with the "provider" field.
(thanks to Cisco Cloud for their support)
When the `prevent_destroy` flag is set on a resource, any plan that
would destroy that resource instead returns an error. This has the
effect of preventing the resource from being unexpectedly destroyed by
Terraform until the flag is removed from the config.
