Ensure that each instance of BasucGraphBuilder gets a name corresponding
to the Builder which created it. This allows us to differentiate the
graphs in the logs.
The dot format generation was done with a mix of code from the terraform
package and the dot package. Unify the dot generation code, and it into
the dag package.
Use an intermediate structure to allow a dag.Graph to marshal itself
directly. This structure will be ablt to marshal directly to JSON, or be
translated to dot format. This was we can record more information about
the graph in the debug logs, and provide a way to translate those logged
structures to dot, which is convenient for viewing the graphs.
This will detect computed counts (which we don't currently support) and
change the error to be more informative that we don't allow computed
counts. Prior to this, the error would instead be something like
`strconv.ParseInt: "${var.foo}" cannot be parsed as int`.
Fixes#5342
The dynamically expanded subgraph wasn't being validated so cycles
weren't being caught here and Terraform would just hang. This fixes
that.
Note that it may make sense to validate higher level when the graph is
expanded but there are certain cases we actually expect the graph to
potentially be invalid, so this seems safer for now.
Fixes#5826
The `prevent_destroy` lifecycle configuration was not being checked when
the count was decreased for a resource with a count. It was only
checking when attributes changed on pre-existing resources.
This fixes that.
This means it’s shown correctly in a plan and takes into account any
actions that are dependant on the tainted resource and, vice verse, any
actions that the tainted resource depends on.
So this changes the behaviour from saying this resource is tainted so
just forget about it and make sure it gets deleted in the background,
to saying I want that resource to be recreated (taking into account the
existing resource and it’s place in the graph).
The ResourceAddress struct grows a new "Mode" field to match with
Resource, and its parser learns to recognize the "data." prefix so it
can set that field.
Allows -target to be applied to data sources, although that is arguably
not a very useful thing to do. Other future uses of resource addressing,
like the state plumbing commands, may be better uses of this.
Wow this one was tricky!
This bug presents itself only when using planfiles, because when doing a
straight `terraform apply` the interpolations are left in place from the
Plan graph walk and paper over the issue. (This detail is what made it
so hard to reproduce initially.)
Basically, graph nodes for module variables are visited during the apply
walk and attempt to interpolate. During a destroy walk, no attributes
are interpolated from resource nodes, so these interpolations fail.
This scenario is supposed to be handled by the `PruneNoopTransformer` -
in fact it's described as the example use case in the comment above it!
So the bug had to do with the actual behavor of the Noop transformer.
The resource nodes were not properly reporting themselves as Noops
during a destroy, so they were being left in the graph.
This in turn triggered the module variable nodes to see that they had
another node depending on them, so they also reported that they could
not be pruned.
Therefore we had two nodes in the graph that were effectively noops but
were being visited anyways. The module variable nodes were already graph
leaves, which is why this error presented itself as just stray messages
instead of actual failure to destroy.
Fixes#5440Fixes#5708Fixes#4988Fixes#3268
Fixes an interpolation race that was occurring when a tainted destroy
node and a primary destroy node both tried to interpolate a computed
count in their config. Since they were sharing a pointer to the _same_
config, depending on how the race played out one of them could catch the
config uninterpolated and would then throw a syntax error.
The `Copy()` tree implemented for this fix can probably be used
elsewhere - basically we should copy the config whenever we drop nodes
into the graph - but for now I'm just applying it to the place that
fixes this bug.
Fixes#4982 - Includes a test covering that race condition.
Instead of trying to skip non-targeted orphans as they are added to
the graph in OrphanTransformer, remove knowledge of targeting from
OrphanTransformer and instead make the orphan resource nodes properly
addressable.
That allows us to use existing logic in TargetTransformer to filter out
the nodes appropriately. This does require adding TargetTransformer to the
list of transforms that run during DynamicExpand so that targeting can
be applied to nodes with expanded counts.
Fixes#4515Fixes#2538Fixes#4462
The `CloseProviderTransformer` relies on the `ProvidedBy()` interface to
look up the proper dependency for the the graph nodes it adds. This
interface needs to yield the name of a provider, _AND_ for flattened
nodes it needs to yield the full path to a provider.
Destroy nodes did not implement this second part, which resulted in
"provider X couldn't be found" when both of these were true:
* A module included a resource that dependend on a provider
* The root did _NOT_ include a provider config
Implementing a proper ProvidedBy() on the flattened version of
destroy nodes solves the issue.
fixes#2581
fixes#1947
Root cause was a bad edge being made by the CBD transform going from the
flattened destroy node to the unflattened create node, which was no
longer in the graph. The destroy node therefore had a dependency that
could never be satisfied, which locked up the walk.
Adds the ability to target resources within modules, like:
module.mymod.aws_instance.foo
And the ability to target all resources inside a module, like:
module.mymod
Closes#1434
This reimplements my prior attempt at nipping issues where a plan did
not yield the same cycle an apply did. My prior attempt was to have
ctx.Validate generate a "Verbose" worst-case graph. It turns out that
skipping PruneDestroyTransformer to generate this graph misses important
heuristics that prevent cycles by dropping destroy nodes that are
determined to be unused.
This resulted in Validate improperly failing in scenarios where these
heuristics would have broken the cycle.
We detected the problem during the work on #1781 and worked around the
issue by reverting to the non-Verbose graph in Validate.
This commit accomplishes the original goal in a better way - by
generating the full graph and checking it once Plan has calculated the
diff. This guarantees that any graph issue that would be caught by Apply
will be caught by Plan.
