Commit Graph

140 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
James Bardin
8dfaae1f23 rewrite all of the test state string for providers
Now that the resolved provider is always stored in state, we need to
udpate all the test data to match. There will probably be some more
breakage once the provider field is properly diffed.
2017-11-07 13:49:43 -05:00
Martin Atkins
37e276e043 core: test correct behavior of plan+apply with unstable values
We have a few pesky functions that don't act like proper functions and
instead return different values on each call. These are tricky because
we need to make sure we don't trip over ourselves by re-generating these
between plan and apply.

Here we add a context test to verify correct behavior in the presence
of such functions.

There's actually a pre-existing bug which this test caught as originally
written: we re-evaluate the interpolation expressions during apply,
causing these unstable functions to produce new values, and so the
applied value ends up not exactly matching the plan. This is a bug that
needs fixing, but it's been around at least since v0.7.6 (random old
version I tried this with to see) so we'll put it on the list and address
it separately. For now, this part of the test is commented out with a
TODO attached.
2017-11-03 16:11:13 -07:00
James Bardin
241dae7ead resintate disabled tests
Reinstate the disabled tests that required some sort of inheritance
during graph evaluation.
2017-11-02 15:29:51 -04:00
James Bardin
a14fd0344c WIP reference providers by full name
This turned out to be a big messy commit, since the way providers are
referenced is tightly coupled throughout the code. That starts to unify
how providers are referenced, using the format output node Name method.

Add a new field to the internal resource data types called
ResolvedProvider. This is set by a new setter method SetProvider when a
resource is connected to a provider during graph creation. This allows
us to later lookup the provider instance a resource is connected to,
without requiring it to have the same module path.

The InitProvider context method now takes 2 arguments, one if the
provider type and the second is the full name of the provider. While the
provider type could still be parsed from the full name, this makes it
more explicit and, and changes to the name format won't effect this
code.
2017-11-02 15:00:06 -04:00
James Bardin
db7596c045 use the inherited provider configs in the graph
Use the configured providers directly, rather than looking for inherited
provider configuration during graph evaluation.

First remove the provider config cache, and the associated
SetProviderConfig and ParentProviderConfig methods on the eval context.
Every provider must be configured, so there's no need to look for
configuration from other provider instances.

The config.ProviderConfig struct now has a Scope field which stores the
proper path for the interpolation scope. To get this metadata to the
interpolator, we add an EvalInterpolatProvider node which can carry the
ProviderConfig, and an InterpolateProvider context method to carry the
ProviderConfig.Scope into the InterplationScope.

Some of the tests could be adjusted to account for the new inheritance
behavior, and some were simply no longer valid and will be removed.

The remaining tests have questions on how they should work in practice.
This mostly concerns orphaned modules where there is no longer a way to
obtain a provider. In some cases we may require that a minimal provider
config be present to handle the destroy process, but we need further
testing.

All disabled code was commented out in this commit to record any
additional comments. The following commit will be a cleanup pass.
2017-10-27 09:08:15 -04:00
James Bardin
3ed7b1abec fix the providerWithLocals test
This test was set to fail once this issue was fixed, and now it's fixed.
2017-10-02 16:21:37 -04:00
James Bardin
da0e74276a fix provider with local value test and docs
Make sure this fails during destroy

Add a note in the documentation that local values may fail during
destroy.
2017-09-29 17:14:07 -04:00
James Bardin
061597304c add test for destroying with locals in a provider
Verify that locals aren't removed from the state before providers are
evaluated during destroy.
2017-09-28 15:31:41 -04:00
James Bardin
77396107c4 don't evaluate locals during destroy
Locals don't need to be evaluated during destroy.  Rather than simply
skipping them, remove them from the state as they are encountered. Even
though they are not persisted in the state, it keeps the state up to
date as the destroy happens, and we reduce the chance of other
inconstancies later on.
2017-09-28 12:56:25 -04:00
James Bardin
9d8ab55658 Add failing test for destroy with locals 2017-09-28 11:06:37 -04:00
Martin Atkins
892f60efe0 core: test that we skip hooks for data source destroy
Data source destroy is an implementation detail and not something that
external callers should see or expect.
2017-09-01 17:55:05 -07:00
Martin Atkins
3a30bfe845 core: evaluate locals and return them for interpolation
We stash the locals in the module state in a map that is ignored for JSON
serialization. We don't include locals in the persisted state because they
can be trivially recomputed and this allows us to assume that they will
pass through verbatim, without any normalization or other transforms
caused by the JSON serialization.

From a user standpoint a local is just a named alias for an expression,
so it's desirable that the result passes through here in as raw a form
as possible, so it behaves as closely as possible to simply using the
given expression directly.
2017-08-21 15:15:25 -07:00
Martin Atkins
a8c58b081c core: -target option to also select resources in descendant modules
Previously the behavior for -target when given a module address was to
target only resources directly within that module, ignoring any resources
defined in child modules.

This behavior turned out to be counter-intuitive, since users expected
the -target address to be interpreted hierarchically.

We'll now use the new "Contains" function for addresses, which provides
a hierarchical "containment" concept that is more consistent with user
expectations. In particular, it allows module.foo to match
module.foo.module.bar.aws_instance.baz, where before that would not have
been true.

Since Contains isn't commutative (unlike Equals) this requires some
special handling for targeting specific indices. When given an argument
like -target=aws_instance.foo[0], the initial graph construction (for
both plan and refresh) is for the resource nodes from configuration, which
have not yet been expanded to separate indexed instances. Thus we need
to do the first pass of TargetsTransformer in mode where indices are
ignored, with the work then completed by the DynamicExpand method which
re-applies the TargetsTransformer in index-sensitive mode.

This is a breaking change for anyone depending on the previous behavior
of -target, since it will now select more resources than before. There is
no way provided to obtain the previous behavior. Eventually we may support
negative targeting, which could then combine with positive targets to
regain the previous behavior as an explicit choice.
2017-06-16 16:36:08 -07:00
Martin Atkins
c835ef8ff3 Update tests for the new ProviderResolver interface
Rather than providing an already-resolved map of plugins to core, we now
provide a "provider resolver" which knows how to resolve a set of provider
dependencies, to be determined later, and produce that map.

This requires the context to be instantiated in a different way, so this
very noisy diff is a mostly-mechanical update of all of the existing
places where contexts get created for testing, using some adapted versions
of the pre-existing utilities for passing in mock providers.
2017-06-09 14:03:59 -07:00
Martin Atkins
8bfc6e7b1c core: add missing ResourceState types in context tests
Previously the Type of a ResourceState was generally ignored, but we're
now starting to use it to figure out which providers are needed to
support the resources in state so our tests need to set it accurately
in order to get the expected result.
2017-06-09 14:03:59 -07:00
Martin Atkins
410b60cb7f Stop requiring multi-vars (splats) to be in array brackets
Prior to Terraform 0.7, lists in Terraform were just a shallow abstraction
on top of strings with a magic delimiter between items. Wrapping a single
string in brackets in the configuration was Terraform's prompt that it
needed to split the string on that delimiter during interpolation.

In 0.7, when first-class lists were added, this convention was preserved
by flattening lists-of-lists by one level when they were encountered in
configuration. However, there was an oversight in that change where it
did not correctly handle the case where the inner list was unknown.

In #14135 we removed some code that was flattening partially-unknown lists
into fully-unknown (untyped) values. This inadvertently exposed the missed
case from the previous paragraph, causing issues for list-wrapped splat
expressions with unknown members. While this worked fine for resources,
due to some fixup done inside helper/schema, this did not work for other
interpolation contexts such as module blocks.

Various attempts to fix this up and restore the flattening behavior
selectively were unsuccessful, due to a proliferation of assumptions all
over the core code that would be too risky to change just to fix this bug.

This change, then, takes the different approach of removing the
requirement that splats be presented inside list brackets. This
requirement didn't make much sense anymore anyway, since no other
list-returning expression had this constraint and so the rest of Terraform
was already successfully dealing with both cases.

This leaves us with two different scenarios:

- For resource arguments, existing normalization code in helper/schema
  does its own flattening that preserves compatibility with the common
  practice of using bracketed splats. This change proves this with a test
  within the "test" provider that exercises the whole Terraform core and
  helper/schema stack that assigns bracketed splats to list and set
  attributes.

- For arguments in other blocks, such as in module callsites, the
  interpolator's own flattening behavior applies to known lists,
  preserving compatibility with configurations from before
  partially-computed splats were possible, but those wishing to use
  partially-computed splats are required to drop the surrounding brackets.
  This is less concerning because this scenario was introduced only in
  0.9.5, so the scope for breakage is limited to those who adopted this
  new feature quickly after upgrading.

As of this commit, the recommendation is to stop using brackets around
splats but the old form continues to be supported for backward
compatibility. In a future _major_ version of Terraform we will probably
phase out this legacy form to improve consistency, but for now both
forms are acceptable at the expense of some (pre-existing) weird behavior
when _actual_ lists-of-lists are used.

This addresses #14521 by officially adopting the suggested workaround of
dropping the brackets around the splat. However, it doesn't yet allow
passing of a partially-unknown list between modules: that still violates
assumptions in Terraform's core, so for the moment partially-unknown lists
work only within a _single_ interpolation expression, and cannot be
passed around between expressions. Until more holistic work is done to
improve Terraform's type handling, passing a partially-unknown splat
through to a module will result in a fully-unknown list emerging on
the other side, just as was the case before #14135; this change just
addresses the fact that this was failing with an error in 0.9.5.
2017-05-23 11:22:37 -07:00
Martin Atkins
45b04c826a core: don't crash if no module state exists for multi var
For child modules, a ModuleState isn't allocated until the first time a
module instance is inserted into the state under the module's path.
Normally interpolations of resource attributes are delayed until at least
one resource has been created due to the nature of the dependency graph,
but if the interpolation value is a multi-var (splat) then it is possible
that the referenced resource has count=0 and thus created _no_ resource
states when it was visited.

Previously we would crash when trying to access the resource map for the
nil module in order to count how many instances are present. Since we know
there can't be any instances present in a nil module, we now preempt
this crash by returning zero early.

This edge-case does not apply to the root module because its ModuleState
is allocated as part of initializing the main State instance.

This fixes #14438.
2017-05-16 09:54:33 -07:00
Martin Atkins
7bdf4a925d core: Allow downstream targeting of certain node types
The previous behavior of targets was that targeting a particular node
would implicitly target everything it depends on. This makes sense when
the dependencies in question are between resources, since we need to
make sure all of a resource's dependencies are in place before we can
create or update it.

However, it had the undesirable side-effect that targeting a resource
would _exclude_ any outputs referring to it, since the dependency edge
goes from output to resource. This then causes the output to be "stale",
which is problematic when outputs are being consumed by downstream
configs using terraform_remote_state.

GraphNodeTargetDownstream allows nodes to opt-in to a new behavior where
they can be targeted by _inverted_ dependency edges. That is, it allows
outputs to be considered targeted if anything they directly depend on
is targeted.

This is different than the implied targeting behavior in the other
direction because transitive dependencies are not considered unless the
intermediate nodes themselves have TargetDownstream. This means that
an output1→output2→resource chain can implicitly target both outputs, but
an output→resource1→resource2 chain _won't_ target the output if only
resource2 is targeted.

This behavior creates a scenario where an output can be visited before
all of its dependencies are ready, since it may have a mixture of both
targeted and untargeted dependencies. This is fine for outputs because
they silently ignore any errors encountered during interpolation anyway,
but other hypothetical future implementers of this interface may need to
be more careful.

This fixes #14186.
2017-05-11 11:57:46 -07:00
James Bardin
ad1cef4227 fix a few races in the context tests
these were so infrequent that the race detector couldn't catch them
either, but on a heavily loaded CI host they occasionally fail.
2017-04-21 12:30:53 -04:00
James Bardin
3f49227b72 add state an context tests
Make sure duplicate depends_on entries are pruned from existing states
on read.

Make sure new state built from configs with multiple references to the
same resource only add it once to the Dependencies.
2017-04-08 15:37:15 -04:00
James Bardin
7c9863ccb0 fix another hot lop in tests
Found another test spinlock.
Slow it down to prevent it from blocking the runtime scheduler.
2017-03-15 12:02:28 -04:00
Mitchell Hashimoto
9900bd752a
terraform: string through the context meta 2017-03-13 16:21:09 -07:00
Mitchell Hashimoto
19a594ba3d
terraform: run Gosched in test so other goroutines run
Starting with Go 1.8 betas, we've periodically received SIGQUITs on our
tests in Travis. The stack trace looks like this:

https://gist.github.com/mitchellh/abf09b0980f8ea01269f8d9d6133884d

The tests are timing out! This is a test that hasn't been touched really
in a very long time and has always passed. I've **reproduced this
locally** by setting `GOMAXPROCS=1` and running the test. By yielding
the scheduler in the hot loop, it now passes almost instantly every
time.

Perhaps the test can be written in a different way, but this gets tests
passing and I think will fix our periodic errors.
2017-03-01 23:12:41 -08:00
Mitchell Hashimoto
f6ab0bc5c4
terraform: interpolation failures on a destroy provisioner should error 2017-02-17 14:32:32 -08:00
Mitchell Hashimoto
a1ec81964b
terraform: destroy ordering needs to handle destroy provisioner edges
This ensures that things aren't destroyed before their values are used.
2017-02-17 14:29:22 -08:00
Mitchell Hashimoto
757217b91f
terraform: destroy resource should depend on destroy-time prov deps 2017-02-17 13:13:44 -08:00
Mitchell Hashimoto
4d6085b46a
terraform: outputs should not be included if not targeted
Fixes #10911

Outputs that aren't targeted shouldn't be included in the graph.

This requires passing targets to the apply graph. This is unfortunate
but long term should be removable since I'd like to move output changes
to the diff as well.
2017-02-13 12:52:45 -08:00
Mitchell Hashimoto
8ed9bdfedc
terraform: node referenceable name from state shuldn't contain path
Fixes #11749

I'm **really** surprised this didn't come up earlier.

When only the state is available for a node, the advertised
referenceable name (the name used for dependency connections) included
the module path. This module path is automatically prepended to the
name. This means that probably every non-root resource for state-only
operations (destroys) didn't order properly.

This fixes that by omitting the path properly.

Multiple tests added to verify both graph correctness as well as a
higher level context test.

Will backport to 0.8.x
2017-02-07 20:14:38 -08:00
Mitchell Hashimoto
61881d2795 Merge pull request #10934 from hashicorp/f-provisioner-stop
core: stoppable provisioners, helper/schema for provisioners
2017-01-30 12:53:15 -08:00
Mitchell Hashimoto
d59725e9fd
terraform: convert StateDeps to use new structs 2017-01-26 20:47:20 -08:00
Mitchell Hashimoto
a8f64cbcee
terraform: make sure Stop blocks until full completion 2017-01-26 15:10:30 -08:00
Mitchell Hashimoto
f8c7b639c9
terraform: switch to Context for stop, Stoppable provisioners
This switches to the Go "context" package for cancellation and threads
the context through all the way to evaluation to allow behavior based on
stopping deep within graph execution.

This also adds the Stop API to provisioners so they can quickly exit
when stop is called.
2017-01-26 15:03:27 -08:00
Mitchell Hashimoto
f40fdde708
terraform: PostProvision hook gets the error from the provision step 2017-01-20 20:21:12 -08:00
Mitchell Hashimoto
b56ee1a169
terraform: test on_failure with non-destroy provisioners 2017-01-20 20:05:28 -08:00
Mitchell Hashimoto
4a8c2d0958
terraform: on_failure for provisioners 2017-01-20 19:55:32 -08:00
Mitchell Hashimoto
85cb3a16b0
terraform: on destroy prov failure, don't taint and preserve state 2017-01-20 18:26:41 -08:00
Mitchell Hashimoto
e9f6c9c429
terraform: run destroy provisioners on destroy 2017-01-20 18:07:51 -08:00
Mitchell Hashimoto
5f1e6ad020
terraform: TargetsTransformer should preserve module variables
Fixes #10680

This moves TargetsTransformer to run after the transforms that add
module variables is run. This makes targeting work across modules (test
added).

This is a bug that only exists in the new graph, but was caught by a
shadow error in #10680. Tests were added to protect against regressions.
2016-12-12 20:59:14 -08:00
James Bardin
ed3517858f Merge pull request #10670 from hashicorp/jbardin/GH-10603
Prevent data sources from being aplied early
2016-12-12 14:53:03 -05:00
James Bardin
d2c6f1b57f Prevent data sources from being aplied early
If a data source has explicit dependencies in `depends_on`, we can
assume the user has added those because of a dependency not tracked
directly in the config. If there are any entries in `depends_on`, don't
apply the data source early during Refresh.
2016-12-12 10:35:10 -05:00
Mitchell Hashimoto
b346ba32d1
terraform: dependent provider resources are destroyed first in modules
This extends the prior commit to also verify (and fix) that resources of
dependent providers are destroyed first even when they're within
modules.
2016-12-10 20:22:12 -05:00
Mitchell Hashimoto
14d079f914
terraform: destroy resources in dependent providers first
Fixes #4645

This is something that never worked (even in legacy graphs), but as we
push forward towards encouraging multi-provider usage especially with
things like the Vault data source, I want to make sure we have this
right for 0.8.

When you have a config like this:

```
resource "foo_type" "name" {}
provider "bar" { attr = "${foo_type.name.value}" }
resource "bar_type" "name" {}
```

Then the destruction ordering MUST be:

  1. `bar_type`
  2. `foo_type`

Since configuring the client for `bar_type` requires accessing data from
`foo_type`. Prior to this PR, these two would be done in parallel. This
properly pushes forward the dependency.

There are more cases I want to test but this is a basic case that is
fixed.
2016-12-10 20:11:24 -05:00
Mitchell Hashimoto
0e4a6e3e89
terraform: apply resource must depend on destroy deps
Fixes #10440

This updates the behavior of "apply" resources to depend on the
destroy versions of their dependencies.

We make an exception to this behavior when the "apply" resource is CBD.
This is odd and not 100% correct, but it mimics the behavior of the
legacy graphs and avoids us having to do major core work to support the
100% correct solution.

I'll explain this in examples...

Given the following configuration:

    resource "null_resource" "a" {
       count = "${var.count}"
    }

    resource "null_resource" "b" {
      triggers { key = "${join(",", null_resource.a.*.id)}" }
    }

Assume we've successfully created this configuration with count = 2.
When going from count = 2 to count = 1, `null_resource.b` should wait
for `null_resource.a.1` to destroy.

If it doesn't, then it is a race: depending when we interpolate the
`triggers.key` attribute of `null_resource.b`, we may get 1 value or 2.
If `null_resource.a.1` is destroyed, we'll get 1. Otherwise, we'll get
2. This was the root cause of #10440

In the legacy graphs, `null_resource.b` would depend on the destruction
of any `null_resource.a` (orphans, tainted, anything!). This would
ensure proper ordering. We mimic that behavior here.

The difference is CBD. If `null_resource.b` has CBD enabled, then the
ordering **in the legacy graph** becomes:

  1. null_resource.b (create)
  2. null_resource.b (destroy)
  3. null_resource.a (destroy)

In this case, the update would always have 2 values for `triggers.key`,
even though we were destroying a resource later! This scenario required
two `terraform apply` operations.

This is what the CBD check is for in this PR. We do this to mimic the
behavior of the legacy graph.

The correct solution to do one day is to allow splat references
(`null_resource.a.*.id`) to happen in parallel and only read up to to
the `count` amount in the state. This requires some fairly significant
work close to the 0.8 release date, so we can defer this to later and
adopt the 0.7.x behavior for now.
2016-12-03 23:54:29 -08:00
Mitchell Hashimoto
08a56304bb Merge pull request #10455 from hashicorp/b-non-cbd-promote
terraform: when promoting non-CBD to CBD, mark the config as such
2016-12-02 09:51:27 -05:00
Mitchell Hashimoto
f3a62c694d
terraform: when promoting non-CBD to CBD, mark the config as such
Fixes #10439

When a CBD resource depends on a non-CBD resource, the non-CBD resource
is auto-promoted to CBD. This was done in
cf3a259. This PR makes it so that we
also set the config CBD to true. This causes the proper runtime
execution behavior to occur where we depose state and so on.

So in addition to simple graph edge tricks we also treat the non-CBD
resources as CBD resources.
2016-12-02 09:46:04 -05:00
Mitchell Hashimoto
41c56ad002
terraform: new apply graph understands destroying deposed only 2016-11-28 14:34:24 -08:00
Mitchell Hashimoto
3bf93501a1
terraform: test applying tainted + deposed (passes)
This is added just trying to reproduce a crash I saw. It passes so
adding it to the master tests.
2016-11-28 14:29:38 -08:00
Mitchell Hashimoto
f50c7acf95
terraform: record dependency to self (other index)
Fixes #10313

The new graph wasn't properly recording resource dependencies to a
specific index of itself. For example: `foo.bar.2` depending on
`foo.bar.0` wasn't shown in the state when it should've been.

This adds a test to verify this and fixes it.
2016-11-23 09:25:20 -08:00
Mitchell Hashimoto
f35d02cbee
terraform: test for alias inheritance [GH-4789] 2016-11-21 21:51:07 -08:00
Mitchell Hashimoto
e7d59ab245
terraform: test for interpolation escapes 2016-11-20 21:14:16 -08:00