Use the ResourceState.Provider field to store the full name of the
provider used during apply. This field is only used when a resource is
removed from the config, and will allow that resource to be removed by
the exact same provider with which it was created.
Modify the locations which might accept the alue of the
ResourceState.Provider field to detect that the name is resolved.
This turned out to be a big messy commit, since the way providers are
referenced is tightly coupled throughout the code. That starts to unify
how providers are referenced, using the format output node Name method.
Add a new field to the internal resource data types called
ResolvedProvider. This is set by a new setter method SetProvider when a
resource is connected to a provider during graph creation. This allows
us to later lookup the provider instance a resource is connected to,
without requiring it to have the same module path.
The InitProvider context method now takes 2 arguments, one if the
provider type and the second is the full name of the provider. While the
provider type could still be parsed from the full name, this makes it
more explicit and, and changes to the name format won't effect this
code.
Fixes#10338
The destruction step for a resource was included the deposed resources
for _all_ resources with that name (ignoring the "index"). For example:
`aws_instance.foo.0` was including destroying deposed for
`aws_instance.foo.1`.
This changes the config to the deposed transformer to properly include
that index.
This change includes a larger change of changing `stateId` to include
the index. This affected more parts but was ultimately the issue in
question.
Ensure that each instance of BasucGraphBuilder gets a name corresponding
to the Builder which created it. This allows us to differentiate the
graphs in the logs.
This enables the shadow graph since all tests pass!
We also change the destroy node to check the resource type using the
addr since that is always available and reliable. The configuration can
be nil for orphans.
This doesn't explicitly set `rs.Provider` on destroy nodes.
To be honest, I'm not sure why this was done in the first place (git
blame points to 6fda7bb5483a155b8ae1e1e4e4b7b7c4073bc1d9). Tests always
passed without it, and by adding it it causes other tests to fail. I
should've never changed those other tests.
Removing it now to get tests passing, this also reverts the test changes
made in 8213824962f085279810f04b60b95d1176a3a3f2.
