Commit Graph

14 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Kristin Laemmert
e3416124cc
addrs: replace "Type string" with "Type Provider" in ProviderConfig
* huge change to weave new addrs.Provider into addrs.ProviderConfig
* terraform: do not include an empty string in the returned Providers /
Provisioners
- Fixed a minor bug where results included an extra empty string
2019-12-06 08:00:18 -05:00
James Bardin
b1025a9d29 update tests to reflect correct provisioners
We no longer create new provisioners for every module.
2019-08-21 19:41:56 -04:00
Martin Atkins
334c6f1c2c core: Be more explicit in how we handle create_before_destroy
Previously our handling of create_before_destroy -- and of deposed objects
in particular -- was rather "implicit" and spread over various different
subsystems. We'd quietly just destroy every deposed object during a
destroy operation, without any user-visible plan to do so.

Here we make things more explicit by tracking each deposed object
individually by its pseudorandomly-allocated key. There are two different
mechanisms at play here, building on the same concepts:

- During a replace operation with create_before_destroy, we *pre-allocate*
  a DeposedKey to use for the prior object in the "apply" node and then
  pass that exact id to the destroy node, ensuring that we only destroy
  the single object we planned to destroy. In the happy path here the
  user never actually sees the allocated deposed key because we use it and
  then immediately destroy it within the same operation. However, that
  destroy may fail, which brings us to the second mechanism:

- If any deposed objects are already present in state during _plan_, we
  insert a destroy change for them into the plan so that it's explicit to
  the user that we are going to destroy these additional objects, and then
  create an individual graph node for each one in DiffTransformer.

The main motivation here is to be more careful in how we handle these
destroys so that from a user's standpoint we never destroy something
without the user knowing about it ahead of time.

However, this new organization also hopefully makes the code itself a
little easier to follow because the connection between the create and
destroy steps of a Replace is reprseented in a single place (in
DiffTransformer) and deposed instances each have their own explicit graph
node rather than being secretly handled as part of the main instance-level
graph node.
2018-10-16 19:14:11 -07:00
Martin Atkins
a3403f2766 terraform: Ugly huge change to weave in new State and Plan types
Due to how often the state and plan types are referenced throughout
Terraform, there isn't a great way to switch them out gradually. As a
consequence, this huge commit gets us from the old world to a _compilable_
new world, but still has a large number of known test failures due to
key functionality being stubbed out.

The stubs here are for anything that interacts with providers, since we
now need to do the follow-up work to similarly replace the old
terraform.ResourceProvider interface with its replacement in the new
"providers" package. That work, along with work to fix the remaining
failing tests, will follow in subsequent commits.

The aim here was to replace all references to terraform.State and its
downstream types with states.State, terraform.Plan with plans.Plan,
state.State with statemgr.State, and switch to the new implementations of
the state and plan file formats. However, due to the number of times those
types are used, this also ended up affecting numerous other parts of core
such as terraform.Hook, the backend.Backend interface, and most of the CLI
commands.

Just as with 5861dbf3fc49b19587a31816eb06f511ab861bb4 before, I apologize
in advance to the person who inevitably just found this huge commit while
spelunking through the commit history.
2018-10-16 19:11:09 -07:00
Martin Atkins
ad6bb4a1d5 core: NodeProvisioner.Name update for new address types
This function was previously checking for a path length greater than one
because the older path format included an always present "root" element
at the start.

We now need to check for a totally-empty list, because otherwise we fail
to add the expected prefix to the front of a path with only one element.

This also includes some adjustments to the related tests and transforms
that do not change behavior but do make the test results easier to
understand and debug.
2018-10-16 18:48:28 -07:00
Martin Atkins
4a21b763aa core: Get tests compiling again
After the refactoring to integrate HCL2 many of the tests were no longer
using correct types, attribute names, etc.

This is a bulk update of all of the tests to make them compile again, with
minimal changes otherwise. Although the tests now compile, many of them
do not yet pass. The tests will be gradually repaired in subsequent
commits, as we continue to complete the refactoring and retrofit work.
2018-10-16 18:46:46 -07:00
Mitchell Hashimoto
6d731b3b46
terraform: new provisioner node 2017-01-26 21:02:55 -08:00
Mitchell Hashimoto
9086e996d6
terraform: convert all tests to use the new config transformer 2017-01-26 19:56:16 -08:00
Mitchell Hashimoto
4f0d68dda4
terraform: PlanGraphBuilder 2016-11-08 13:59:17 -08:00
Mitchell Hashimoto
d2e9c35007
terraform: new apply graph creates provisioners in modules
Fixes #9840

The new apply graph wasn't properly nesting provisioners. This resulted
in reading the provisioners being nil on apply in the shadow graph which
caused the crash in the above issue.

The actual cause of this is that the new graphs we're moving towards do
not have any "flattening" (they are flat to begin with): all modules are
in the root graph from the beginning of construction versus building a
number of different graphs and flattening them. The transform that adds
the provisioners wasn't modified to handle already-flat graphs and so
was only adding provisioners to the root module, not children.

The change modifies the `MissingProvisionerTransformer` (primarily) to
support already-flat graphs and add provisioners for all module levels.
Tests are there to cover this as well.

**NOTE:** This PR focuses on fixing that specific issue. I'm going to follow up
this PR with another PR that is more focused on being robust against
crashing (more nil checks, recover() for shadow graph, etc.). In the
interest of focus and keeping a PR reviewable this focuses only on the
issue itself.
2016-11-03 10:25:11 -07:00
Sander van Harmelen
1bec11472a Cleaning up the PruneProvisionerTransformer
And renamed some types so they better reflect what they are for.
2016-02-04 21:32:10 +01:00
Sander van Harmelen
5c3da47d8e Fix the provisioner graphing
Without this change, all provisioners are added to the graph by default
and they are never pruned from the graph if their not needed.
2016-01-28 16:14:15 +01:00
Sander van Harmelen
0b1dbf31a3 core: close provider/provisioner connections
Currently Terraform is leaking goroutines and with that memory. I know
strictly speaking this maybe isn’t a real concern for Terraform as it’s
mostly used as a short running command line executable.

But there are a few of us out there that are using Terraform in some
long running processes and then this starts to become a problem.

Next to that it’s of course good programming practise to clean up
resources when they're not needed anymore. So even for the standard
command line use case, this seems an improvement in resource management.

Personally I see no downsides as the primary connection to the plugin
is kept alive (the plugin is not killed) and only unused connections
that will never be used again are closed to free up any related
goroutines and memory.
2015-06-19 21:52:50 +02:00
Mitchell Hashimoto
ea42deb66c terraform: provisioner transforms 2015-02-19 12:07:58 -08:00