Previously we'd create the stub provider in any case where we didn't need
a configured provider, but we also need to skip creating it if there's
already a provider node present, or else we can end up with multiple
stub nodes in the graph.
The provider schema cache is keyed by provider configuration address
rather than provider type, so we need to do the same inheritance logic
to resolve providers needed because of reference as we do for providers
needed for direct use.
This allows resources that override "provider" or resources in child
modules that have their own provider configurations to be associated
with the provider config they will eventually get schema from, rather
than (as before) always the default configuration for the provider in
the root module.
Eventually it'd probably be better to switch to using a provider cache
that is keyed by provider _type_ rather than provider config, but since
it's currently fetched by visiting the individual provider graph nodes
we currently visit each provider configuration separately and fetch a
schema for each.
Any non-resource (outputs, variables, locals) that references a resource
type must also be connected to that resources provider. This is required
during apply, because the graph built from the diff may not include the
referenced resources because they are being evaluated from the state.
If the provider isn't present already, add a NodeEvalableProvider to
fetch the provider schema.
The provider transformers now need to happen after the outputs, locals,
and variables are transformed.
The final "<resource> provided by <provider>" message was showing the
original selection made by the resource itself rather than the provider
address finally resolved after inheritance, which caused the log to
misrepresent what was actually being created in the graph.
The prior implementation of this function (before the rewrite to use
addrs.AbsProviderConfig values) was relying on some implicit behavior of
our provider address normalization to generate an address in the root
module. Since that wasn't explicit, I introduced a bug here when
introducing the new address type, where I generated an address in the
node's own module, rather than in the root as expected.
This new implementation is functionally equivalent to the prior, but is
written to make the intent more obvious: take _just_ the type from the
node's provider address and create an implicit configuration for it
_in the root module_.
Along with the change in approach, this new implementation also has an
updated documentation comment that better describes its current intent
(previously it was outdated) and hopefully clearer trace logging to
better communicate what it's doing.
In the change to using addrs types rather than string keys directly here
I incorrectly made this use the _relative_ provider config instead of
the absolute one, causing MissingProviderTransformer to only match
providers defined in the root module (due to ambiguity in the string
representations of these address types).
The rest of this change is improved logging and test output that helped
with debugging this issue.
Some of the objects that are referencable from expressions are transient
values computed only during a graph walk, and not persisted in state. In
order to support arbitrary evaluation of expressions, such as in the
"terraform console" CLI command, it's necessary to be able to evaluate
these values before we start evaluating.
This new Eval method achieves this by performing a special graph walk that
ignores resources (except for dependency resolution) and just focuses on
evaluating all of these transient values, before returning an evaluation
scope that can then resolve expressions in terms of that result.
This replaces the Context.Interpolator method, which was fraught with
various issues due to it not properly priming the state before evaluating.
Due to a logic error here we were trying to find our our module's parent
as a descendent of itself, rather than as a descendent of the root. It
turns out that we can do this even more simply by just accessing the
Parent field on the given config, avoiding the need to traverse the tree
down from the root at all.
While here, this also switches to using the path.Call helper method rather
than manually slicing the path array, since this better communicates our
intent.
Due to how deeply the configuration types go into Terraform Core, there
isn't a great way to switch out to HCL2 gradually. As a consequence, this
huge commit gets us from the old state to a _compilable_ new state, but
does not yet attempt to fix any tests and has a number of known missing
parts and bugs. We will continue to iterate on this in forthcoming
commits, heading back towards passing tests and making Terraform
fully-functional again.
The three main goals here are:
- Use the configuration models from the "configs" package instead of the
older models in the "config" package, which is now deprecated and
preserved only to help us write our migration tool.
- Do expression inspection and evaluation using the functionality of the
new "lang" package, instead of the Interpolator type and related
functionality in the main "terraform" package.
- Represent addresses of various objects using types in the addrs package,
rather than hand-constructed strings. This is not critical to support
the above, but was a big help during the implementation of these other
points since it made it much more explicit what kind of address is
expected in each context.
Since our new packages are built to accommodate some future planned
features that are not yet implemented (e.g. the "for_each" argument on
resources, "count"/"for_each" on modules), and since there's still a fair
amount of functionality still using old-style APIs, there is a moderate
amount of shimming here to connect new assumptions with old, hopefully in
a way that makes it easier to find and eliminate these shims later.
I apologize in advance to the person who inevitably just found this huge
commit while spelunking through the commit history.
The provider name coming from ProvidedBy may be resolved if it only
exists in the state. Make sure to strip the module and provider
prefixes for the provider name when adding missing providers.
It's become apparent that passing in a provider config for an implicitly
used provider would be very useful. While the ProviderConfigTransformer
efficiently added providers to the graph, the algorithm was reversed
from what would be needed to allow overriding implicit providers.
Change the ProviderConfigTransformer to fist add all configured
provider, even if they are empty stubs. Then run through all providers
being passed in from the parent, and replace the provider nodes we
created with proxies, and add implicit proxies where none existed. The
extra nodes will then be pruned later.
Our new resource-to-provider matching is stricter about explicitly
matching aliases when config is present (no longer automatically
inherited) and with locating providers to destroy removed resources.
With this in mind, this is an attempt to expand slightly on this error
message now that users are more likely to see it.
In future it would be nice to do some explicit validation of this a bit
closer to the UI, so we can have room for more explanatory text, but this
additional messaging is intended to help users understand why they might
be seeing this message after removing a provider configuration block from
configuration, whether directly or as a side-effect of removing a module.
Use the ResourceState.Provider field to store the full name of the
provider used during apply. This field is only used when a resource is
removed from the config, and will allow that resource to be removed by
the exact same provider with which it was created.
Modify the locations which might accept the alue of the
ResourceState.Provider field to detect that the name is resolved.
Here we complete the passing of providers between modules via the
module/providers configuration, add another test and update broken test
outputs.
The DisbableProviderTransformer is being removed, since it was really
only for provider configuration inheritance. Since configuration is no
longer inherited, there's no need to keep around unused providers. The
actually shouldn't be any unused providers going into the graph any
longer, but put off verifying that condition for later. Replace it's
usage with the PruneProviderTransformer, and use that to also remove the
unneeded proxy provider nodes.
Implement the adding of provider through the module/providers map in the
configuration.
The way this works is that we start walking the module tree from the
top, and for any instance of a provider that can accept a configuration
through the parent's module/provider map, we add a proxy node that
provides the real name and a pointer to the actual parent provider node.
Multiple proxies can be chained back to the original provider. When
connecting resources to providers, if that provider is a proxy, we can
then connect the resource directly to the proxied node. The proxies are
later removed by the DisabledProviderTransformer.
This should re-instate the 0.11 beta inheritance behavior, but will
allow us to later store the actual concrete provider used by a resource,
so that it can be re-connected if it's orphaned by removing its module
configuration.
A missing provider alias should not be implicitly added to the graph.
Run the AttachaProviderConfigTransformer immediately after adding the
providers, since the ProviderConfigTransformer should have just added
these nodes.
We can remove the AllowAny option which is no longer used, and providers
don't need to be connected to their resources at this stage, since that
will happen in the ProviderTransformer.
Simplify the MissingProviderTransformer so that it only adds missing
providers at the root level. There's no need for the multitple providers
added at every level of the path
ParentProviderTransformer then only needs to connect providers with the
equivalent type at the root level.
The CloserProviderTransformer requires that the resources be connected
to their provider first, so that it cen get the correct dependencies,
and adding the ProviderTransformer changed the test output slightly.
This turned out to be a big messy commit, since the way providers are
referenced is tightly coupled throughout the code. That starts to unify
how providers are referenced, using the format output node Name method.
Add a new field to the internal resource data types called
ResolvedProvider. This is set by a new setter method SetProvider when a
resource is connected to a provider during graph creation. This allows
us to later lookup the provider instance a resource is connected to,
without requiring it to have the same module path.
The InitProvider context method now takes 2 arguments, one if the
provider type and the second is the full name of the provider. While the
provider type could still be parsed from the full name, this makes it
more explicit and, and changes to the name format won't effect this
code.
The first step in only using the required provider nodes in a graph is
to be able to specifically add them from the configuration.
The MissingProviderTransformer was previously responsible for adding
all providers. Now it is really just adding any that are missing from
the config.
Fixes#4645
This is something that never worked (even in legacy graphs), but as we
push forward towards encouraging multi-provider usage especially with
things like the Vault data source, I want to make sure we have this
right for 0.8.
When you have a config like this:
```
resource "foo_type" "name" {}
provider "bar" { attr = "${foo_type.name.value}" }
resource "bar_type" "name" {}
```
Then the destruction ordering MUST be:
1. `bar_type`
2. `foo_type`
Since configuring the client for `bar_type` requires accessing data from
`foo_type`. Prior to this PR, these two would be done in parallel. This
properly pushes forward the dependency.
There are more cases I want to test but this is a basic case that is
fixed.
The dot format generation was done with a mix of code from the terraform
package and the dot package. Unify the dot generation code, and it into
the dag package.
Use an intermediate structure to allow a dag.Graph to marshal itself
directly. This structure will be ablt to marshal directly to JSON, or be
translated to dot format. This was we can record more information about
the graph in the debug logs, and provide a way to translate those logged
structures to dot, which is convenient for viewing the graphs.
This adds the proper logic for "disabling" providers to the new apply
graph: interolating and storing the config for inheritance but not
actually initializing and configuring the provider.
This is important since parent modules will often contain incomplete
provider configurations for the purpose of inheritance that would error
if they were actually attempted to be configured (since they're
incomplete). If the provider is not used, it should be "disabled".
This fixes an issue where orphaned grandchild modules don't properly
inherit their provider configurations from grandparents. I found this
while working on shadow graphs (the shadow graph actually caught an
inconsistency between runs and exposed this bug!), so I'm unsure if this
affects any issue.
To better explain the issue, I'll diagram things.
Here is a hierarchy that _works_ (w/o this PR):
```
root
|-- child1 (orphan)
|-- child2
|-- grandchild
```
All modules in this case will successfully inherit provider
configurations from "root".
Here is a hierarchy that _doesn't work without this PR_:
```
root
|-- child1 (orphan)
|-- grandchild (orphan)
```
In this case, `child1` does successfully inherit the provider from root,
but `grandchild` _will not_ unless `child1` had resources. If `child1`
has no resources, it wouldn't inherit anything. This PR fixes that.
The flattening process was not properly drawing dependencies between provider
nodes in modules and their parent provider nodes.
Fixes#2832Fixes#4443Fixes#4865
The `CloseProviderTransformer` relies on the `ProvidedBy()` interface to
look up the proper dependency for the the graph nodes it adds. This
interface needs to yield the name of a provider, _AND_ for flattened
nodes it needs to yield the full path to a provider.
Destroy nodes did not implement this second part, which resulted in
"provider X couldn't be found" when both of these were true:
* A module included a resource that dependend on a provider
* The root did _NOT_ include a provider config
Implementing a proper ProvidedBy() on the flattened version of
destroy nodes solves the issue.
fixes#2581
