mirror of
https://github.com/opentofu/opentofu.git
synced 2025-01-18 12:42:58 -06:00
782132da33
The config is already validated, and does not need to be checked in AssertPlanValid. Add some more coverage for plan validation.
420 lines
16 KiB
Go
420 lines
16 KiB
Go
package objchange
|
|
|
|
import (
|
|
"fmt"
|
|
|
|
"github.com/zclconf/go-cty/cty"
|
|
|
|
"github.com/hashicorp/terraform/internal/configs/configschema"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
// AssertPlanValid checks checks whether a planned new state returned by a
|
|
// provider's PlanResourceChange method is suitable to achieve a change
|
|
// from priorState to config. It returns a slice with nonzero length if
|
|
// any problems are detected. Because problems here indicate bugs in the
|
|
// provider that generated the plannedState, they are written with provider
|
|
// developers as an audience, rather than end-users.
|
|
//
|
|
// All of the given values must have the same type and must conform to the
|
|
// implied type of the given schema, or this function may panic or produce
|
|
// garbage results.
|
|
//
|
|
// During planning, a provider may only make changes to attributes that are
|
|
// null (unset) in the configuration and are marked as "computed" in the
|
|
// resource type schema, in order to insert any default values the provider
|
|
// may know about. If the default value cannot be determined until apply time,
|
|
// the provider can return an unknown value. Providers are forbidden from
|
|
// planning a change that disagrees with any non-null argument in the
|
|
// configuration.
|
|
//
|
|
// As a special exception, providers _are_ allowed to provide attribute values
|
|
// conflicting with configuration if and only if the planned value exactly
|
|
// matches the corresponding attribute value in the prior state. The provider
|
|
// can use this to signal that the new value is functionally equivalent to
|
|
// the old and thus no change is required.
|
|
func AssertPlanValid(schema *configschema.Block, priorState, config, plannedState cty.Value) []error {
|
|
return assertPlanValid(schema, priorState, config, plannedState, nil)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func assertPlanValid(schema *configschema.Block, priorState, config, plannedState cty.Value, path cty.Path) []error {
|
|
var errs []error
|
|
if plannedState.IsNull() && !config.IsNull() {
|
|
errs = append(errs, path.NewErrorf("planned for absence but config wants existence"))
|
|
return errs
|
|
}
|
|
if config.IsNull() && !plannedState.IsNull() {
|
|
errs = append(errs, path.NewErrorf("planned for existence but config wants absence"))
|
|
return errs
|
|
}
|
|
if plannedState.IsNull() {
|
|
// No further checks possible if the planned value is null
|
|
return errs
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
impTy := schema.ImpliedType()
|
|
|
|
// verify attributes
|
|
moreErrs := assertPlannedAttrsValid(schema.Attributes, priorState, config, plannedState, path)
|
|
errs = append(errs, moreErrs...)
|
|
|
|
for name, blockS := range schema.BlockTypes {
|
|
path := append(path, cty.GetAttrStep{Name: name})
|
|
plannedV := plannedState.GetAttr(name)
|
|
configV := config.GetAttr(name)
|
|
priorV := cty.NullVal(impTy.AttributeType(name))
|
|
if !priorState.IsNull() {
|
|
priorV = priorState.GetAttr(name)
|
|
}
|
|
if plannedV.RawEquals(configV) {
|
|
// Easy path: nothing has changed at all
|
|
continue
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if !configV.IsKnown() {
|
|
// An unknown config block represents a dynamic block where the
|
|
// for_each value is unknown, and therefor cannot be altered by the
|
|
// provider.
|
|
errs = append(errs, path.NewErrorf("planned value %#v for unknown dynamic block", plannedV))
|
|
continue
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if !plannedV.IsKnown() {
|
|
// Only dynamic configuration can set blocks to unknown, so this is
|
|
// not allowed from the provider. This means that either the config
|
|
// and plan should match, or we have an error where the plan
|
|
// changed the config value, both of which have been checked.
|
|
errs = append(errs, path.NewErrorf("attribute representing nested block must not be unknown itself; set nested attribute values to unknown instead"))
|
|
continue
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
switch blockS.Nesting {
|
|
case configschema.NestingSingle, configschema.NestingGroup:
|
|
moreErrs := assertPlanValid(&blockS.Block, priorV, configV, plannedV, path)
|
|
errs = append(errs, moreErrs...)
|
|
case configschema.NestingList:
|
|
// A NestingList might either be a list or a tuple, depending on
|
|
// whether there are dynamically-typed attributes inside. However,
|
|
// both support a similar-enough API that we can treat them the
|
|
// same for our purposes here.
|
|
if plannedV.IsNull() {
|
|
errs = append(errs, path.NewErrorf("attribute representing a list of nested blocks must be empty to indicate no blocks, not null"))
|
|
continue
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
plannedL := plannedV.LengthInt()
|
|
configL := configV.LengthInt()
|
|
if plannedL != configL {
|
|
errs = append(errs, path.NewErrorf("block count in plan (%d) disagrees with count in config (%d)", plannedL, configL))
|
|
continue
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for it := plannedV.ElementIterator(); it.Next(); {
|
|
idx, plannedEV := it.Element()
|
|
path := append(path, cty.IndexStep{Key: idx})
|
|
if !plannedEV.IsKnown() {
|
|
errs = append(errs, path.NewErrorf("element representing nested block must not be unknown itself; set nested attribute values to unknown instead"))
|
|
continue
|
|
}
|
|
if !configV.HasIndex(idx).True() {
|
|
continue // should never happen since we checked the lengths above
|
|
}
|
|
configEV := configV.Index(idx)
|
|
priorEV := cty.NullVal(blockS.ImpliedType())
|
|
if !priorV.IsNull() && priorV.HasIndex(idx).True() {
|
|
priorEV = priorV.Index(idx)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
moreErrs := assertPlanValid(&blockS.Block, priorEV, configEV, plannedEV, path)
|
|
errs = append(errs, moreErrs...)
|
|
}
|
|
case configschema.NestingMap:
|
|
if plannedV.IsNull() {
|
|
errs = append(errs, path.NewErrorf("attribute representing a map of nested blocks must be empty to indicate no blocks, not null"))
|
|
continue
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// A NestingMap might either be a map or an object, depending on
|
|
// whether there are dynamically-typed attributes inside, but
|
|
// that's decided statically and so all values will have the same
|
|
// kind.
|
|
if plannedV.Type().IsObjectType() {
|
|
plannedAtys := plannedV.Type().AttributeTypes()
|
|
configAtys := configV.Type().AttributeTypes()
|
|
for k := range plannedAtys {
|
|
if _, ok := configAtys[k]; !ok {
|
|
errs = append(errs, path.NewErrorf("block key %q from plan is not present in config", k))
|
|
continue
|
|
}
|
|
path := append(path, cty.GetAttrStep{Name: k})
|
|
|
|
plannedEV := plannedV.GetAttr(k)
|
|
if !plannedEV.IsKnown() {
|
|
errs = append(errs, path.NewErrorf("element representing nested block must not be unknown itself; set nested attribute values to unknown instead"))
|
|
continue
|
|
}
|
|
configEV := configV.GetAttr(k)
|
|
priorEV := cty.NullVal(blockS.ImpliedType())
|
|
if !priorV.IsNull() && priorV.Type().HasAttribute(k) {
|
|
priorEV = priorV.GetAttr(k)
|
|
}
|
|
moreErrs := assertPlanValid(&blockS.Block, priorEV, configEV, plannedEV, path)
|
|
errs = append(errs, moreErrs...)
|
|
}
|
|
for k := range configAtys {
|
|
if _, ok := plannedAtys[k]; !ok {
|
|
errs = append(errs, path.NewErrorf("block key %q from config is not present in plan", k))
|
|
continue
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
} else {
|
|
plannedL := plannedV.LengthInt()
|
|
configL := configV.LengthInt()
|
|
if plannedL != configL {
|
|
errs = append(errs, path.NewErrorf("block count in plan (%d) disagrees with count in config (%d)", plannedL, configL))
|
|
continue
|
|
}
|
|
for it := plannedV.ElementIterator(); it.Next(); {
|
|
idx, plannedEV := it.Element()
|
|
path := append(path, cty.IndexStep{Key: idx})
|
|
if !plannedEV.IsKnown() {
|
|
errs = append(errs, path.NewErrorf("element representing nested block must not be unknown itself; set nested attribute values to unknown instead"))
|
|
continue
|
|
}
|
|
k := idx.AsString()
|
|
if !configV.HasIndex(idx).True() {
|
|
errs = append(errs, path.NewErrorf("block key %q from plan is not present in config", k))
|
|
continue
|
|
}
|
|
configEV := configV.Index(idx)
|
|
priorEV := cty.NullVal(blockS.ImpliedType())
|
|
if !priorV.IsNull() && priorV.HasIndex(idx).True() {
|
|
priorEV = priorV.Index(idx)
|
|
}
|
|
moreErrs := assertPlanValid(&blockS.Block, priorEV, configEV, plannedEV, path)
|
|
errs = append(errs, moreErrs...)
|
|
}
|
|
for it := configV.ElementIterator(); it.Next(); {
|
|
idx, _ := it.Element()
|
|
if !plannedV.HasIndex(idx).True() {
|
|
errs = append(errs, path.NewErrorf("block key %q from config is not present in plan", idx.AsString()))
|
|
continue
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
case configschema.NestingSet:
|
|
if plannedV.IsNull() {
|
|
errs = append(errs, path.NewErrorf("attribute representing a set of nested blocks must be empty to indicate no blocks, not null"))
|
|
continue
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Because set elements have no identifier with which to correlate
|
|
// them, we can't robustly validate the plan for a nested block
|
|
// backed by a set, and so unfortunately we need to just trust the
|
|
// provider to do the right thing. :(
|
|
//
|
|
// (In principle we could correlate elements by matching the
|
|
// subset of attributes explicitly set in config, except for the
|
|
// special diff suppression rule which allows for there to be a
|
|
// planned value that is constructed by mixing part of a prior
|
|
// value with part of a config value, creating an entirely new
|
|
// element that is not present in either prior nor config.)
|
|
for it := plannedV.ElementIterator(); it.Next(); {
|
|
idx, plannedEV := it.Element()
|
|
path := append(path, cty.IndexStep{Key: idx})
|
|
if !plannedEV.IsKnown() {
|
|
errs = append(errs, path.NewErrorf("element representing nested block must not be unknown itself; set nested attribute values to unknown instead"))
|
|
continue
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
default:
|
|
panic(fmt.Sprintf("unsupported nesting mode %s", blockS.Nesting))
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return errs
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func assertPlannedAttrsValid(schema map[string]*configschema.Attribute, priorState, config, plannedState cty.Value, path cty.Path) []error {
|
|
var errs []error
|
|
for name, attrS := range schema {
|
|
moreErrs := assertPlannedAttrValid(name, attrS, priorState, config, plannedState, path)
|
|
errs = append(errs, moreErrs...)
|
|
}
|
|
return errs
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func assertPlannedAttrValid(name string, attrS *configschema.Attribute, priorState, config, plannedState cty.Value, path cty.Path) []error {
|
|
plannedV := plannedState.GetAttr(name)
|
|
configV := config.GetAttr(name)
|
|
priorV := cty.NullVal(attrS.Type)
|
|
if !priorState.IsNull() {
|
|
priorV = priorState.GetAttr(name)
|
|
}
|
|
path = append(path, cty.GetAttrStep{Name: name})
|
|
|
|
return assertPlannedValueValid(attrS, priorV, configV, plannedV, path)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func assertPlannedValueValid(attrS *configschema.Attribute, priorV, configV, plannedV cty.Value, path cty.Path) []error {
|
|
var errs []error
|
|
if plannedV.RawEquals(configV) {
|
|
// This is the easy path: provider didn't change anything at all.
|
|
return errs
|
|
}
|
|
if plannedV.RawEquals(priorV) && !priorV.IsNull() && !configV.IsNull() {
|
|
// Also pretty easy: there is a prior value and the provider has
|
|
// returned it unchanged. This indicates that configV and plannedV
|
|
// are functionally equivalent and so the provider wishes to disregard
|
|
// the configuration value in favor of the prior.
|
|
return errs
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// the provider is allowed to insert values when the config is
|
|
// null, but only if the attribute is computed.
|
|
if configV.IsNull() {
|
|
if attrS.Computed {
|
|
return errs
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// if the attribute is not computed, then any planned value is incorrect
|
|
if !plannedV.IsNull() {
|
|
if attrS.Sensitive {
|
|
errs = append(errs, path.NewErrorf("sensitive planned value for a non-computed attribute"))
|
|
} else {
|
|
errs = append(errs, path.NewErrorf("planned value %#v for a non-computed attribute", plannedV))
|
|
}
|
|
return errs
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// If this attribute has a NestedType, validate the nested object
|
|
if attrS.NestedType != nil {
|
|
return assertPlannedObjectValid(attrS.NestedType, priorV, configV, plannedV, path)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// If none of the above conditions match, the provider has made an invalid
|
|
// change to this attribute.
|
|
if priorV.IsNull() {
|
|
if attrS.Sensitive {
|
|
errs = append(errs, path.NewErrorf("sensitive planned value does not match config value"))
|
|
} else {
|
|
errs = append(errs, path.NewErrorf("planned value %#v does not match config value %#v", plannedV, configV))
|
|
}
|
|
return errs
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if attrS.Sensitive {
|
|
errs = append(errs, path.NewErrorf("sensitive planned value does not match config value nor prior value"))
|
|
} else {
|
|
errs = append(errs, path.NewErrorf("planned value %#v does not match config value %#v nor prior value %#v", plannedV, configV, priorV))
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return errs
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func assertPlannedObjectValid(schema *configschema.Object, prior, config, planned cty.Value, path cty.Path) []error {
|
|
var errs []error
|
|
|
|
if planned.IsNull() && !config.IsNull() {
|
|
errs = append(errs, path.NewErrorf("planned for absence but config wants existence"))
|
|
return errs
|
|
}
|
|
if config.IsNull() && !planned.IsNull() {
|
|
errs = append(errs, path.NewErrorf("planned for existence but config wants absence"))
|
|
return errs
|
|
}
|
|
if planned.IsNull() {
|
|
// No further checks possible if the planned value is null
|
|
return errs
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
switch schema.Nesting {
|
|
case configschema.NestingSingle, configschema.NestingGroup:
|
|
moreErrs := assertPlannedAttrsValid(schema.Attributes, prior, config, planned, path)
|
|
errs = append(errs, moreErrs...)
|
|
|
|
case configschema.NestingList:
|
|
// A NestingList might either be a list or a tuple, depending on
|
|
// whether there are dynamically-typed attributes inside. However,
|
|
// both support a similar-enough API that we can treat them the
|
|
// same for our purposes here.
|
|
|
|
plannedL := planned.LengthInt()
|
|
configL := config.LengthInt()
|
|
if plannedL != configL {
|
|
errs = append(errs, path.NewErrorf("count in plan (%d) disagrees with count in config (%d)", plannedL, configL))
|
|
return errs
|
|
}
|
|
for it := planned.ElementIterator(); it.Next(); {
|
|
idx, plannedEV := it.Element()
|
|
path := append(path, cty.IndexStep{Key: idx})
|
|
if !config.HasIndex(idx).True() {
|
|
continue // should never happen since we checked the lengths above
|
|
}
|
|
configEV := config.Index(idx)
|
|
priorEV := cty.NullVal(schema.ImpliedType())
|
|
if !prior.IsNull() && prior.HasIndex(idx).True() {
|
|
priorEV = prior.Index(idx)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
moreErrs := assertPlannedAttrsValid(schema.Attributes, priorEV, configEV, plannedEV, path)
|
|
errs = append(errs, moreErrs...)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
case configschema.NestingMap:
|
|
// A NestingMap might either be a map or an object, depending on
|
|
// whether there are dynamically-typed attributes inside, so we will
|
|
// break these down to maps to handle them both in the same manner.
|
|
plannedVals := map[string]cty.Value{}
|
|
configVals := map[string]cty.Value{}
|
|
priorVals := map[string]cty.Value{}
|
|
|
|
if !planned.IsNull() {
|
|
plannedVals = planned.AsValueMap()
|
|
}
|
|
if !config.IsNull() {
|
|
configVals = config.AsValueMap()
|
|
}
|
|
if !prior.IsNull() {
|
|
priorVals = prior.AsValueMap()
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for k, plannedEV := range plannedVals {
|
|
configEV, ok := configVals[k]
|
|
if !ok {
|
|
errs = append(errs, path.NewErrorf("map key %q from plan is not present in config", k))
|
|
continue
|
|
}
|
|
path := append(path, cty.GetAttrStep{Name: k})
|
|
|
|
priorEV, ok := priorVals[k]
|
|
if !ok {
|
|
priorEV = cty.NullVal(schema.ImpliedType())
|
|
}
|
|
moreErrs := assertPlannedAttrsValid(schema.Attributes, priorEV, configEV, plannedEV, path)
|
|
errs = append(errs, moreErrs...)
|
|
}
|
|
for k := range configVals {
|
|
if _, ok := plannedVals[k]; !ok {
|
|
errs = append(errs, path.NewErrorf("map key %q from config is not present in plan", k))
|
|
continue
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
case configschema.NestingSet:
|
|
plannedL := planned.LengthInt()
|
|
configL := config.LengthInt()
|
|
if plannedL != configL {
|
|
errs = append(errs, path.NewErrorf("count in plan (%d) disagrees with count in config (%d)", plannedL, configL))
|
|
return errs
|
|
}
|
|
// Because set elements have no identifier with which to correlate
|
|
// them, we can't robustly validate the plan for a nested object
|
|
// backed by a set, and so unfortunately we need to just trust the
|
|
// provider to do the right thing.
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return errs
|
|
}
|