opentofu/terraform/eval_validate.go
James Bardin 99db18388a return diagnostics from resource validation
Return diagnostics rather than an error, since the EvalNodes have been
removed and the caller has been updated.

IgnoreWarnings was no longer used.
2020-11-04 16:56:17 -05:00

525 lines
16 KiB
Go

package terraform
import (
"fmt"
"github.com/hashicorp/hcl/v2"
"github.com/hashicorp/terraform/addrs"
"github.com/hashicorp/terraform/configs"
"github.com/hashicorp/terraform/configs/configschema"
"github.com/hashicorp/terraform/providers"
"github.com/hashicorp/terraform/provisioners"
"github.com/hashicorp/terraform/tfdiags"
"github.com/zclconf/go-cty/cty"
"github.com/zclconf/go-cty/cty/convert"
"github.com/zclconf/go-cty/cty/gocty"
)
// EvalValidateProvisioner validates the configuration of a provisioner
// belonging to a resource. The provisioner config is expected to contain the
// merged connection configurations.
type EvalValidateProvisioner struct {
ResourceAddr addrs.Resource
Provisioner *provisioners.Interface
Schema **configschema.Block
Config *configs.Provisioner
ResourceHasCount bool
ResourceHasForEach bool
}
func (n *EvalValidateProvisioner) Validate(ctx EvalContext) error {
provisioner := *n.Provisioner
config := *n.Config
schema := *n.Schema
var diags tfdiags.Diagnostics
// Validate the provisioner's own config first
configVal, _, configDiags := n.evaluateBlock(ctx, config.Config, schema)
diags = diags.Append(configDiags)
if configDiags.HasErrors() {
return diags.Err()
}
if configVal == cty.NilVal {
// Should never happen for a well-behaved EvaluateBlock implementation
return fmt.Errorf("EvaluateBlock returned nil value")
}
req := provisioners.ValidateProvisionerConfigRequest{
Config: configVal,
}
resp := provisioner.ValidateProvisionerConfig(req)
diags = diags.Append(resp.Diagnostics)
// Now validate the connection config, which contains the merged bodies
// of the resource and provisioner connection blocks.
connDiags := n.validateConnConfig(ctx, config.Connection, n.ResourceAddr)
diags = diags.Append(connDiags)
return diags.NonFatalErr()
}
func (n *EvalValidateProvisioner) validateConnConfig(ctx EvalContext, config *configs.Connection, self addrs.Referenceable) tfdiags.Diagnostics {
// We can't comprehensively validate the connection config since its
// final structure is decided by the communicator and we can't instantiate
// that until we have a complete instance state. However, we *can* catch
// configuration keys that are not valid for *any* communicator, catching
// typos early rather than waiting until we actually try to run one of
// the resource's provisioners.
var diags tfdiags.Diagnostics
if config == nil || config.Config == nil {
// No block to validate
return diags
}
// We evaluate here just by evaluating the block and returning any
// diagnostics we get, since evaluation alone is enough to check for
// extraneous arguments and incorrectly-typed arguments.
_, _, configDiags := n.evaluateBlock(ctx, config.Config, connectionBlockSupersetSchema)
diags = diags.Append(configDiags)
return diags
}
func (n *EvalValidateProvisioner) evaluateBlock(ctx EvalContext, body hcl.Body, schema *configschema.Block) (cty.Value, hcl.Body, tfdiags.Diagnostics) {
keyData := EvalDataForNoInstanceKey
selfAddr := n.ResourceAddr.Instance(addrs.NoKey)
if n.ResourceHasCount {
// For a resource that has count, we allow count.index but don't
// know at this stage what it will return.
keyData = InstanceKeyEvalData{
CountIndex: cty.UnknownVal(cty.Number),
}
// "self" can't point to an unknown key, but we'll force it to be
// key 0 here, which should return an unknown value of the
// expected type since none of these elements are known at this
// point anyway.
selfAddr = n.ResourceAddr.Instance(addrs.IntKey(0))
} else if n.ResourceHasForEach {
// For a resource that has for_each, we allow each.value and each.key
// but don't know at this stage what it will return.
keyData = InstanceKeyEvalData{
EachKey: cty.UnknownVal(cty.String),
EachValue: cty.DynamicVal,
}
// "self" can't point to an unknown key, but we'll force it to be
// key "" here, which should return an unknown value of the
// expected type since none of these elements are known at
// this point anyway.
selfAddr = n.ResourceAddr.Instance(addrs.StringKey(""))
}
return ctx.EvaluateBlock(body, schema, selfAddr, keyData)
}
// connectionBlockSupersetSchema is a schema representing the superset of all
// possible arguments for "connection" blocks across all supported connection
// types.
//
// This currently lives here because we've not yet updated our communicator
// subsystem to be aware of schema itself. Once that is done, we can remove
// this and use a type-specific schema from the communicator to validate
// exactly what is expected for a given connection type.
var connectionBlockSupersetSchema = &configschema.Block{
Attributes: map[string]*configschema.Attribute{
// NOTE: "type" is not included here because it's treated special
// by the config loader and stored away in a separate field.
// Common attributes for both connection types
"host": {
Type: cty.String,
Required: true,
},
"type": {
Type: cty.String,
Optional: true,
},
"user": {
Type: cty.String,
Optional: true,
},
"password": {
Type: cty.String,
Optional: true,
},
"port": {
Type: cty.String,
Optional: true,
},
"timeout": {
Type: cty.String,
Optional: true,
},
"script_path": {
Type: cty.String,
Optional: true,
},
// For type=ssh only (enforced in ssh communicator)
"private_key": {
Type: cty.String,
Optional: true,
},
"certificate": {
Type: cty.String,
Optional: true,
},
"host_key": {
Type: cty.String,
Optional: true,
},
"agent": {
Type: cty.Bool,
Optional: true,
},
"agent_identity": {
Type: cty.String,
Optional: true,
},
"bastion_host": {
Type: cty.String,
Optional: true,
},
"bastion_host_key": {
Type: cty.String,
Optional: true,
},
"bastion_port": {
Type: cty.Number,
Optional: true,
},
"bastion_user": {
Type: cty.String,
Optional: true,
},
"bastion_password": {
Type: cty.String,
Optional: true,
},
"bastion_private_key": {
Type: cty.String,
Optional: true,
},
"bastion_certificate": {
Type: cty.String,
Optional: true,
},
// For type=winrm only (enforced in winrm communicator)
"https": {
Type: cty.Bool,
Optional: true,
},
"insecure": {
Type: cty.Bool,
Optional: true,
},
"cacert": {
Type: cty.String,
Optional: true,
},
"use_ntlm": {
Type: cty.Bool,
Optional: true,
},
},
}
// connectionBlockSupersetSchema is a schema representing the superset of all
// possible arguments for "connection" blocks across all supported connection
// types.
//
// This currently lives here because we've not yet updated our communicator
// subsystem to be aware of schema itself. It's exported only for use in the
// configs/configupgrade package and should not be used from anywhere else.
// The caller may not modify any part of the returned schema data structure.
func ConnectionBlockSupersetSchema() *configschema.Block {
return connectionBlockSupersetSchema
}
// EvalValidateResource validates the configuration of a resource.
type EvalValidateResource struct {
Addr addrs.Resource
Provider *providers.Interface
ProviderSchema **ProviderSchema
Config *configs.Resource
ProviderMetas map[addrs.Provider]*configs.ProviderMeta
// ConfigVal, if non-nil, will be updated with the value resulting from
// evaluating the given configuration body. Since validation is performed
// very early, this value is likely to contain lots of unknown values,
// but its type will conform to the schema of the resource type associated
// with the resource instance being validated.
ConfigVal *cty.Value
}
func (n *EvalValidateResource) Validate(ctx EvalContext) tfdiags.Diagnostics {
var diags tfdiags.Diagnostics
if *n.ProviderSchema == nil {
diags = diags.Append(fmt.Errorf("EvalValidateResource has nil schema for %s", n.Addr))
return diags
}
provider := *n.Provider
cfg := *n.Config
schema := *n.ProviderSchema
mode := cfg.Mode
keyData := EvalDataForNoInstanceKey
switch {
case n.Config.Count != nil:
// If the config block has count, we'll evaluate with an unknown
// number as count.index so we can still type check even though
// we won't expand count until the plan phase.
keyData = InstanceKeyEvalData{
CountIndex: cty.UnknownVal(cty.Number),
}
// Basic type-checking of the count argument. More complete validation
// of this will happen when we DynamicExpand during the plan walk.
countDiags := n.validateCount(ctx, n.Config.Count)
diags = diags.Append(countDiags)
case n.Config.ForEach != nil:
keyData = InstanceKeyEvalData{
EachKey: cty.UnknownVal(cty.String),
EachValue: cty.UnknownVal(cty.DynamicPseudoType),
}
// Evaluate the for_each expression here so we can expose the diagnostics
forEachDiags := n.validateForEach(ctx, n.Config.ForEach)
diags = diags.Append(forEachDiags)
}
diags = diags.Append(validateDependsOn(ctx, n.Config.DependsOn))
// Validate the provider_meta block for the provider this resource
// belongs to, if there is one.
//
// Note: this will return an error for every resource a provider
// uses in a module, if the provider_meta for that module is
// incorrect. The only way to solve this that we've foudn is to
// insert a new ProviderMeta graph node in the graph, and make all
// that provider's resources in the module depend on the node. That's
// an awful heavy hammer to swing for this feature, which should be
// used only in limited cases with heavy coordination with the
// Terraform team, so we're going to defer that solution for a future
// enhancement to this functionality.
/*
if n.ProviderMetas != nil {
if m, ok := n.ProviderMetas[n.ProviderAddr.ProviderConfig.Type]; ok && m != nil {
// if the provider doesn't support this feature, throw an error
if (*n.ProviderSchema).ProviderMeta == nil {
diags = diags.Append(&hcl.Diagnostic{
Severity: hcl.DiagError,
Summary: fmt.Sprintf("Provider %s doesn't support provider_meta", cfg.ProviderConfigAddr()),
Detail: fmt.Sprintf("The resource %s belongs to a provider that doesn't support provider_meta blocks", n.Addr),
Subject: &m.ProviderRange,
})
} else {
_, _, metaDiags := ctx.EvaluateBlock(m.Config, (*n.ProviderSchema).ProviderMeta, nil, EvalDataForNoInstanceKey)
diags = diags.Append(metaDiags)
}
}
}
*/
// BUG(paddy): we're not validating provider_meta blocks on EvalValidate right now
// because the ProviderAddr for the resource isn't available on the EvalValidate
// struct.
// Provider entry point varies depending on resource mode, because
// managed resources and data resources are two distinct concepts
// in the provider abstraction.
switch mode {
case addrs.ManagedResourceMode:
schema, _ := schema.SchemaForResourceType(mode, cfg.Type)
if schema == nil {
diags = diags.Append(&hcl.Diagnostic{
Severity: hcl.DiagError,
Summary: "Invalid resource type",
Detail: fmt.Sprintf("The provider %s does not support resource type %q.", cfg.ProviderConfigAddr(), cfg.Type),
Subject: &cfg.TypeRange,
})
return diags
}
configVal, _, valDiags := ctx.EvaluateBlock(cfg.Config, schema, nil, keyData)
diags = diags.Append(valDiags)
if valDiags.HasErrors() {
return diags
}
if cfg.Managed != nil { // can be nil only in tests with poorly-configured mocks
for _, traversal := range cfg.Managed.IgnoreChanges {
// validate the ignore_changes traversals apply.
moreDiags := schema.StaticValidateTraversal(traversal)
diags = diags.Append(moreDiags)
// TODO: we want to notify users that they can't use
// ignore_changes for computed attributes, but we don't have an
// easy way to correlate the config value, schema and
// traversal together.
}
}
req := providers.ValidateResourceTypeConfigRequest{
TypeName: cfg.Type,
Config: configVal,
}
resp := provider.ValidateResourceTypeConfig(req)
diags = diags.Append(resp.Diagnostics.InConfigBody(cfg.Config))
if n.ConfigVal != nil {
*n.ConfigVal = configVal
}
case addrs.DataResourceMode:
schema, _ := schema.SchemaForResourceType(mode, cfg.Type)
if schema == nil {
diags = diags.Append(&hcl.Diagnostic{
Severity: hcl.DiagError,
Summary: "Invalid data source",
Detail: fmt.Sprintf("The provider %s does not support data source %q.", cfg.ProviderConfigAddr(), cfg.Type),
Subject: &cfg.TypeRange,
})
return diags
}
configVal, _, valDiags := ctx.EvaluateBlock(cfg.Config, schema, nil, keyData)
diags = diags.Append(valDiags)
if valDiags.HasErrors() {
return diags
}
req := providers.ValidateDataSourceConfigRequest{
TypeName: cfg.Type,
Config: configVal,
}
resp := provider.ValidateDataSourceConfig(req)
diags = diags.Append(resp.Diagnostics.InConfigBody(cfg.Config))
}
return diags
}
func (n *EvalValidateResource) validateCount(ctx EvalContext, expr hcl.Expression) tfdiags.Diagnostics {
if expr == nil {
return nil
}
var diags tfdiags.Diagnostics
countVal, countDiags := ctx.EvaluateExpr(expr, cty.Number, nil)
diags = diags.Append(countDiags)
if diags.HasErrors() {
return diags
}
if countVal.IsNull() {
diags = diags.Append(&hcl.Diagnostic{
Severity: hcl.DiagError,
Summary: "Invalid count argument",
Detail: `The given "count" argument value is null. An integer is required.`,
Subject: expr.Range().Ptr(),
})
return diags
}
var err error
countVal, err = convert.Convert(countVal, cty.Number)
if err != nil {
diags = diags.Append(&hcl.Diagnostic{
Severity: hcl.DiagError,
Summary: "Invalid count argument",
Detail: fmt.Sprintf(`The given "count" argument value is unsuitable: %s.`, err),
Subject: expr.Range().Ptr(),
})
return diags
}
// If the value isn't known then that's the best we can do for now, but
// we'll check more thoroughly during the plan walk.
if !countVal.IsKnown() {
return diags
}
// If we _do_ know the value, then we can do a few more checks here.
var count int
err = gocty.FromCtyValue(countVal, &count)
if err != nil {
// Isn't a whole number, etc.
diags = diags.Append(&hcl.Diagnostic{
Severity: hcl.DiagError,
Summary: "Invalid count argument",
Detail: fmt.Sprintf(`The given "count" argument value is unsuitable: %s.`, err),
Subject: expr.Range().Ptr(),
})
return diags
}
if count < 0 {
diags = diags.Append(&hcl.Diagnostic{
Severity: hcl.DiagError,
Summary: "Invalid count argument",
Detail: `The given "count" argument value is unsuitable: count cannot be negative.`,
Subject: expr.Range().Ptr(),
})
return diags
}
return diags
}
func (n *EvalValidateResource) validateForEach(ctx EvalContext, expr hcl.Expression) (diags tfdiags.Diagnostics) {
val, forEachDiags := evaluateForEachExpressionValue(expr, ctx, true)
// If the value isn't known then that's the best we can do for now, but
// we'll check more thoroughly during the plan walk
if !val.IsKnown() {
return diags
}
if forEachDiags.HasErrors() {
diags = diags.Append(forEachDiags)
}
return diags
}
func validateDependsOn(ctx EvalContext, dependsOn []hcl.Traversal) (diags tfdiags.Diagnostics) {
for _, traversal := range dependsOn {
ref, refDiags := addrs.ParseRef(traversal)
diags = diags.Append(refDiags)
if !refDiags.HasErrors() && len(ref.Remaining) != 0 {
diags = diags.Append(&hcl.Diagnostic{
Severity: hcl.DiagError,
Summary: "Invalid depends_on reference",
Detail: "References in depends_on must be to a whole object (resource, etc), not to an attribute of an object.",
Subject: ref.Remaining.SourceRange().Ptr(),
})
}
// The ref must also refer to something that exists. To test that,
// we'll just eval it and count on the fact that our evaluator will
// detect references to non-existent objects.
if !diags.HasErrors() {
scope := ctx.EvaluationScope(nil, EvalDataForNoInstanceKey)
if scope != nil { // sometimes nil in tests, due to incomplete mocks
_, refDiags = scope.EvalReference(ref, cty.DynamicPseudoType)
diags = diags.Append(refDiags)
}
}
}
return diags
}