mirror of
https://github.com/opentofu/opentofu.git
synced 2024-12-25 08:21:07 -06:00
820 lines
23 KiB
Go
820 lines
23 KiB
Go
// Copyright (c) HashiCorp, Inc.
|
|
// SPDX-License-Identifier: MPL-2.0
|
|
|
|
package tofu
|
|
|
|
import (
|
|
"testing"
|
|
|
|
"github.com/zclconf/go-cty/cty"
|
|
|
|
"github.com/opentofu/opentofu/internal/addrs"
|
|
"github.com/opentofu/opentofu/internal/checks"
|
|
"github.com/opentofu/opentofu/internal/configs/configschema"
|
|
"github.com/opentofu/opentofu/internal/plans"
|
|
"github.com/opentofu/opentofu/internal/providers"
|
|
"github.com/opentofu/opentofu/internal/states"
|
|
"github.com/opentofu/opentofu/internal/tfdiags"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
// This file contains 'integration' tests for the OpenTofu check blocks.
|
|
//
|
|
// These tests could live in context_apply_test or context_apply2_test but given
|
|
// the size of those files, it makes sense to keep these check related tests
|
|
// grouped together.
|
|
|
|
type checksTestingStatus struct {
|
|
status checks.Status
|
|
messages []string
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestContextChecks(t *testing.T) {
|
|
tests := map[string]struct {
|
|
configs map[string]string
|
|
plan map[string]checksTestingStatus
|
|
planError string
|
|
planWarning string
|
|
apply map[string]checksTestingStatus
|
|
applyError string
|
|
applyWarning string
|
|
state *states.State
|
|
provider *MockProvider
|
|
providerHook func(*MockProvider)
|
|
}{
|
|
"passing": {
|
|
configs: map[string]string{
|
|
"main.tf": `
|
|
provider "checks" {}
|
|
|
|
check "passing" {
|
|
data "checks_object" "positive" {}
|
|
|
|
assert {
|
|
condition = data.checks_object.positive.number >= 0
|
|
error_message = "negative number"
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
`,
|
|
},
|
|
plan: map[string]checksTestingStatus{
|
|
"passing": {
|
|
status: checks.StatusPass,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
apply: map[string]checksTestingStatus{
|
|
"passing": {
|
|
status: checks.StatusPass,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
provider: &MockProvider{
|
|
Meta: "checks",
|
|
GetProviderSchemaResponse: &providers.GetProviderSchemaResponse{
|
|
DataSources: map[string]providers.Schema{
|
|
"checks_object": {
|
|
Block: &configschema.Block{
|
|
Attributes: map[string]*configschema.Attribute{
|
|
"number": {
|
|
Type: cty.Number,
|
|
Computed: true,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
ReadDataSourceFn: func(request providers.ReadDataSourceRequest) providers.ReadDataSourceResponse {
|
|
return providers.ReadDataSourceResponse{
|
|
State: cty.ObjectVal(map[string]cty.Value{
|
|
"number": cty.NumberIntVal(0),
|
|
}),
|
|
}
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
"failing": {
|
|
configs: map[string]string{
|
|
"main.tf": `
|
|
provider "checks" {}
|
|
|
|
check "failing" {
|
|
data "checks_object" "positive" {}
|
|
|
|
assert {
|
|
condition = data.checks_object.positive.number >= 0
|
|
error_message = "negative number"
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
`,
|
|
},
|
|
plan: map[string]checksTestingStatus{
|
|
"failing": {
|
|
status: checks.StatusFail,
|
|
messages: []string{"negative number"},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
planWarning: "Check block assertion failed: negative number",
|
|
apply: map[string]checksTestingStatus{
|
|
"failing": {
|
|
status: checks.StatusFail,
|
|
messages: []string{"negative number"},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
applyWarning: "Check block assertion failed: negative number",
|
|
provider: &MockProvider{
|
|
Meta: "checks",
|
|
GetProviderSchemaResponse: &providers.GetProviderSchemaResponse{
|
|
DataSources: map[string]providers.Schema{
|
|
"checks_object": {
|
|
Block: &configschema.Block{
|
|
Attributes: map[string]*configschema.Attribute{
|
|
"number": {
|
|
Type: cty.Number,
|
|
Computed: true,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
ReadDataSourceFn: func(request providers.ReadDataSourceRequest) providers.ReadDataSourceResponse {
|
|
return providers.ReadDataSourceResponse{
|
|
State: cty.ObjectVal(map[string]cty.Value{
|
|
"number": cty.NumberIntVal(-1),
|
|
}),
|
|
}
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
"mixed": {
|
|
configs: map[string]string{
|
|
"main.tf": `
|
|
provider "checks" {}
|
|
|
|
check "failing" {
|
|
data "checks_object" "neutral" {}
|
|
|
|
assert {
|
|
condition = data.checks_object.neutral.number >= 0
|
|
error_message = "negative number"
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
assert {
|
|
condition = data.checks_object.neutral.number < 0
|
|
error_message = "positive number"
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
`,
|
|
},
|
|
plan: map[string]checksTestingStatus{
|
|
"failing": {
|
|
status: checks.StatusFail,
|
|
messages: []string{"positive number"},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
planWarning: "Check block assertion failed: positive number",
|
|
apply: map[string]checksTestingStatus{
|
|
"failing": {
|
|
status: checks.StatusFail,
|
|
messages: []string{"positive number"},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
applyWarning: "Check block assertion failed: positive number",
|
|
provider: &MockProvider{
|
|
Meta: "checks",
|
|
GetProviderSchemaResponse: &providers.GetProviderSchemaResponse{
|
|
DataSources: map[string]providers.Schema{
|
|
"checks_object": {
|
|
Block: &configschema.Block{
|
|
Attributes: map[string]*configschema.Attribute{
|
|
"number": {
|
|
Type: cty.Number,
|
|
Computed: true,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
ReadDataSourceFn: func(request providers.ReadDataSourceRequest) providers.ReadDataSourceResponse {
|
|
return providers.ReadDataSourceResponse{
|
|
State: cty.ObjectVal(map[string]cty.Value{
|
|
"number": cty.NumberIntVal(0),
|
|
}),
|
|
}
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
"nested data blocks reload during apply": {
|
|
configs: map[string]string{
|
|
"main.tf": `
|
|
provider "checks" {}
|
|
|
|
data "checks_object" "data_block" {}
|
|
|
|
check "data_block" {
|
|
assert {
|
|
condition = data.checks_object.data_block.number >= 0
|
|
error_message = "negative number"
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
check "nested_data_block" {
|
|
data "checks_object" "nested_data_block" {}
|
|
|
|
assert {
|
|
condition = data.checks_object.nested_data_block.number >= 0
|
|
error_message = "negative number"
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
`,
|
|
},
|
|
plan: map[string]checksTestingStatus{
|
|
"nested_data_block": {
|
|
status: checks.StatusFail,
|
|
messages: []string{"negative number"},
|
|
},
|
|
"data_block": {
|
|
status: checks.StatusFail,
|
|
messages: []string{"negative number"},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
planWarning: "2 warnings:\n\n- Check block assertion failed: negative number\n- Check block assertion failed: negative number",
|
|
apply: map[string]checksTestingStatus{
|
|
"nested_data_block": {
|
|
status: checks.StatusPass,
|
|
},
|
|
"data_block": {
|
|
status: checks.StatusFail,
|
|
messages: []string{"negative number"},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
applyWarning: "Check block assertion failed: negative number",
|
|
provider: &MockProvider{
|
|
Meta: "checks",
|
|
GetProviderSchemaResponse: &providers.GetProviderSchemaResponse{
|
|
DataSources: map[string]providers.Schema{
|
|
"checks_object": {
|
|
Block: &configschema.Block{
|
|
Attributes: map[string]*configschema.Attribute{
|
|
"number": {
|
|
Type: cty.Number,
|
|
Computed: true,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
ReadDataSourceFn: func(request providers.ReadDataSourceRequest) providers.ReadDataSourceResponse {
|
|
return providers.ReadDataSourceResponse{
|
|
State: cty.ObjectVal(map[string]cty.Value{
|
|
"number": cty.NumberIntVal(-1),
|
|
}),
|
|
}
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
providerHook: func(provider *MockProvider) {
|
|
provider.ReadDataSourceFn = func(request providers.ReadDataSourceRequest) providers.ReadDataSourceResponse {
|
|
// The data returned by the data sources are changing
|
|
// between the plan and apply stage. The nested data block
|
|
// will update to reflect this while the normal data block
|
|
// will not detect the change.
|
|
return providers.ReadDataSourceResponse{
|
|
State: cty.ObjectVal(map[string]cty.Value{
|
|
"number": cty.NumberIntVal(0),
|
|
}),
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
"returns unknown for unknown config": {
|
|
configs: map[string]string{
|
|
"main.tf": `
|
|
provider "checks" {}
|
|
|
|
resource "checks_object" "resource_block" {}
|
|
|
|
check "resource_block" {
|
|
data "checks_object" "data_block" {
|
|
id = checks_object.resource_block.id
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
assert {
|
|
condition = data.checks_object.data_block.number >= 0
|
|
error_message = "negative number"
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
`,
|
|
},
|
|
plan: map[string]checksTestingStatus{
|
|
"resource_block": {
|
|
status: checks.StatusUnknown,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
planWarning: "Check block assertion known after apply: The condition could not be evaluated at this time, a result will be known when this plan is applied.",
|
|
apply: map[string]checksTestingStatus{
|
|
"resource_block": {
|
|
status: checks.StatusPass,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
provider: &MockProvider{
|
|
Meta: "checks",
|
|
GetProviderSchemaResponse: &providers.GetProviderSchemaResponse{
|
|
ResourceTypes: map[string]providers.Schema{
|
|
"checks_object": {
|
|
Block: &configschema.Block{
|
|
Attributes: map[string]*configschema.Attribute{
|
|
"id": {
|
|
Type: cty.String,
|
|
Computed: true,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
DataSources: map[string]providers.Schema{
|
|
"checks_object": {
|
|
Block: &configschema.Block{
|
|
Attributes: map[string]*configschema.Attribute{
|
|
"id": {
|
|
Type: cty.String,
|
|
Required: true,
|
|
},
|
|
"number": {
|
|
Type: cty.Number,
|
|
Computed: true,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
PlanResourceChangeFn: func(request providers.PlanResourceChangeRequest) providers.PlanResourceChangeResponse {
|
|
return providers.PlanResourceChangeResponse{
|
|
PlannedState: cty.ObjectVal(map[string]cty.Value{
|
|
"id": cty.UnknownVal(cty.String),
|
|
}),
|
|
}
|
|
},
|
|
ApplyResourceChangeFn: func(request providers.ApplyResourceChangeRequest) providers.ApplyResourceChangeResponse {
|
|
return providers.ApplyResourceChangeResponse{
|
|
NewState: cty.ObjectVal(map[string]cty.Value{
|
|
"id": cty.StringVal("7A9F887D-44C7-4281-80E5-578E41F99DFC"),
|
|
}),
|
|
}
|
|
},
|
|
ReadDataSourceFn: func(request providers.ReadDataSourceRequest) providers.ReadDataSourceResponse {
|
|
values := request.Config.AsValueMap()
|
|
if id, ok := values["id"]; ok {
|
|
if id.IsKnown() && id.AsString() == "7A9F887D-44C7-4281-80E5-578E41F99DFC" {
|
|
return providers.ReadDataSourceResponse{
|
|
State: cty.ObjectVal(map[string]cty.Value{
|
|
"id": cty.StringVal("7A9F887D-44C7-4281-80E5-578E41F99DFC"),
|
|
"number": cty.NumberIntVal(0),
|
|
}),
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return providers.ReadDataSourceResponse{
|
|
Diagnostics: tfdiags.Diagnostics{tfdiags.Sourceless(tfdiags.Error, "shouldn't make it here", "really shouldn't make it here")},
|
|
}
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
"failing nested data source doesn't block the plan": {
|
|
configs: map[string]string{
|
|
"main.tf": `
|
|
provider "checks" {}
|
|
|
|
check "error" {
|
|
data "checks_object" "data_block" {}
|
|
|
|
assert {
|
|
condition = data.checks_object.data_block.number >= 0
|
|
error_message = "negative number"
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
`,
|
|
},
|
|
plan: map[string]checksTestingStatus{
|
|
"error": {
|
|
status: checks.StatusFail,
|
|
messages: []string{
|
|
"data source read failed: something bad happened and the provider couldn't read the data source",
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
planWarning: "data source read failed: something bad happened and the provider couldn't read the data source",
|
|
apply: map[string]checksTestingStatus{
|
|
"error": {
|
|
status: checks.StatusFail,
|
|
messages: []string{
|
|
"data source read failed: something bad happened and the provider couldn't read the data source",
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
applyWarning: "data source read failed: something bad happened and the provider couldn't read the data source",
|
|
provider: &MockProvider{
|
|
Meta: "checks",
|
|
GetProviderSchemaResponse: &providers.GetProviderSchemaResponse{
|
|
DataSources: map[string]providers.Schema{
|
|
"checks_object": {
|
|
Block: &configschema.Block{
|
|
Attributes: map[string]*configschema.Attribute{
|
|
"number": {
|
|
Type: cty.Number,
|
|
Computed: true,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
ReadDataSourceFn: func(request providers.ReadDataSourceRequest) providers.ReadDataSourceResponse {
|
|
return providers.ReadDataSourceResponse{
|
|
Diagnostics: tfdiags.Diagnostics{tfdiags.Sourceless(tfdiags.Error, "data source read failed", "something bad happened and the provider couldn't read the data source")},
|
|
}
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
}, "failing nested data source should prevent checks from executing": {
|
|
configs: map[string]string{
|
|
"main.tf": `
|
|
provider "checks" {}
|
|
|
|
resource "checks_object" "resource_block" {
|
|
number = -1
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
check "error" {
|
|
data "checks_object" "data_block" {}
|
|
|
|
assert {
|
|
condition = checks_object.resource_block.number >= 0
|
|
error_message = "negative number"
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
`,
|
|
},
|
|
state: states.BuildState(func(state *states.SyncState) {
|
|
state.SetResourceInstanceCurrent(
|
|
addrs.Resource{
|
|
Mode: addrs.ManagedResourceMode,
|
|
Type: "checks_object",
|
|
Name: "resource_block",
|
|
}.Instance(addrs.NoKey).Absolute(addrs.RootModuleInstance),
|
|
&states.ResourceInstanceObjectSrc{
|
|
Status: states.ObjectReady,
|
|
AttrsJSON: []byte(`{"number": -1}`),
|
|
},
|
|
addrs.AbsProviderConfig{
|
|
Provider: addrs.NewDefaultProvider("test"),
|
|
Module: addrs.RootModule,
|
|
})
|
|
}),
|
|
plan: map[string]checksTestingStatus{
|
|
"error": {
|
|
status: checks.StatusFail,
|
|
messages: []string{
|
|
"data source read failed: something bad happened and the provider couldn't read the data source",
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
planWarning: "data source read failed: something bad happened and the provider couldn't read the data source",
|
|
apply: map[string]checksTestingStatus{
|
|
"error": {
|
|
status: checks.StatusFail,
|
|
messages: []string{
|
|
"data source read failed: something bad happened and the provider couldn't read the data source",
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
applyWarning: "data source read failed: something bad happened and the provider couldn't read the data source",
|
|
provider: &MockProvider{
|
|
Meta: "checks",
|
|
GetProviderSchemaResponse: &providers.GetProviderSchemaResponse{
|
|
ResourceTypes: map[string]providers.Schema{
|
|
"checks_object": {
|
|
Block: &configschema.Block{
|
|
Attributes: map[string]*configschema.Attribute{
|
|
"number": {
|
|
Type: cty.Number,
|
|
Required: true,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
DataSources: map[string]providers.Schema{
|
|
"checks_object": {
|
|
Block: &configschema.Block{
|
|
Attributes: map[string]*configschema.Attribute{
|
|
"number": {
|
|
Type: cty.Number,
|
|
Computed: true,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
PlanResourceChangeFn: func(request providers.PlanResourceChangeRequest) providers.PlanResourceChangeResponse {
|
|
return providers.PlanResourceChangeResponse{
|
|
PlannedState: cty.ObjectVal(map[string]cty.Value{
|
|
"number": cty.NumberIntVal(-1),
|
|
}),
|
|
}
|
|
},
|
|
ApplyResourceChangeFn: func(request providers.ApplyResourceChangeRequest) providers.ApplyResourceChangeResponse {
|
|
return providers.ApplyResourceChangeResponse{
|
|
NewState: cty.ObjectVal(map[string]cty.Value{
|
|
"number": cty.NumberIntVal(-1),
|
|
}),
|
|
}
|
|
},
|
|
ReadDataSourceFn: func(request providers.ReadDataSourceRequest) providers.ReadDataSourceResponse {
|
|
return providers.ReadDataSourceResponse{
|
|
Diagnostics: tfdiags.Diagnostics{tfdiags.Sourceless(tfdiags.Error, "data source read failed", "something bad happened and the provider couldn't read the data source")},
|
|
}
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
"check failing in state and passing after plan and apply": {
|
|
configs: map[string]string{
|
|
"main.tf": `
|
|
provider "checks" {}
|
|
|
|
resource "checks_object" "resource" {
|
|
number = 0
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
check "passing" {
|
|
assert {
|
|
condition = checks_object.resource.number >= 0
|
|
error_message = "negative number"
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
`,
|
|
},
|
|
state: states.BuildState(func(state *states.SyncState) {
|
|
state.SetResourceInstanceCurrent(
|
|
addrs.Resource{
|
|
Mode: addrs.ManagedResourceMode,
|
|
Type: "checks_object",
|
|
Name: "resource",
|
|
}.Instance(addrs.NoKey).Absolute(addrs.RootModuleInstance),
|
|
&states.ResourceInstanceObjectSrc{
|
|
Status: states.ObjectReady,
|
|
AttrsJSON: []byte(`{"number": -1}`),
|
|
},
|
|
addrs.AbsProviderConfig{
|
|
Provider: addrs.NewDefaultProvider("test"),
|
|
Module: addrs.RootModule,
|
|
})
|
|
}),
|
|
plan: map[string]checksTestingStatus{
|
|
"passing": {
|
|
status: checks.StatusPass,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
apply: map[string]checksTestingStatus{
|
|
"passing": {
|
|
status: checks.StatusPass,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
provider: &MockProvider{
|
|
Meta: "checks",
|
|
GetProviderSchemaResponse: &providers.GetProviderSchemaResponse{
|
|
ResourceTypes: map[string]providers.Schema{
|
|
"checks_object": {
|
|
Block: &configschema.Block{
|
|
Attributes: map[string]*configschema.Attribute{
|
|
"number": {
|
|
Type: cty.Number,
|
|
Required: true,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
PlanResourceChangeFn: func(request providers.PlanResourceChangeRequest) providers.PlanResourceChangeResponse {
|
|
return providers.PlanResourceChangeResponse{
|
|
PlannedState: cty.ObjectVal(map[string]cty.Value{
|
|
"number": cty.NumberIntVal(0),
|
|
}),
|
|
}
|
|
},
|
|
ApplyResourceChangeFn: func(request providers.ApplyResourceChangeRequest) providers.ApplyResourceChangeResponse {
|
|
return providers.ApplyResourceChangeResponse{
|
|
NewState: cty.ObjectVal(map[string]cty.Value{
|
|
"number": cty.NumberIntVal(0),
|
|
}),
|
|
}
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
"failing data source does block the plan": {
|
|
configs: map[string]string{
|
|
"main.tf": `
|
|
provider "checks" {}
|
|
|
|
data "checks_object" "data_block" {}
|
|
|
|
check "error" {
|
|
assert {
|
|
condition = data.checks_object.data_block.number >= 0
|
|
error_message = "negative number"
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
`,
|
|
},
|
|
planError: "data source read failed: something bad happened and the provider couldn't read the data source",
|
|
provider: &MockProvider{
|
|
Meta: "checks",
|
|
GetProviderSchemaResponse: &providers.GetProviderSchemaResponse{
|
|
DataSources: map[string]providers.Schema{
|
|
"checks_object": {
|
|
Block: &configschema.Block{
|
|
Attributes: map[string]*configschema.Attribute{
|
|
"number": {
|
|
Type: cty.Number,
|
|
Computed: true,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
ReadDataSourceFn: func(request providers.ReadDataSourceRequest) providers.ReadDataSourceResponse {
|
|
return providers.ReadDataSourceResponse{
|
|
Diagnostics: tfdiags.Diagnostics{tfdiags.Sourceless(tfdiags.Error, "data source read failed", "something bad happened and the provider couldn't read the data source")},
|
|
}
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
"invalid reference into check block": {
|
|
configs: map[string]string{
|
|
"main.tf": `
|
|
provider "checks" {}
|
|
|
|
data "checks_object" "data_block" {
|
|
id = data.checks_object.nested_data_block.id
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
check "error" {
|
|
data "checks_object" "nested_data_block" {}
|
|
|
|
assert {
|
|
condition = data.checks_object.data_block.number >= 0
|
|
error_message = "negative number"
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
`,
|
|
},
|
|
planError: "Reference to scoped resource: The referenced data resource \"checks_object\" \"nested_data_block\" is not available from this context.",
|
|
provider: &MockProvider{
|
|
Meta: "checks",
|
|
GetProviderSchemaResponse: &providers.GetProviderSchemaResponse{
|
|
DataSources: map[string]providers.Schema{
|
|
"checks_object": {
|
|
Block: &configschema.Block{
|
|
Attributes: map[string]*configschema.Attribute{
|
|
"id": {
|
|
Type: cty.String,
|
|
Computed: true,
|
|
Optional: true,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
ReadDataSourceFn: func(request providers.ReadDataSourceRequest) providers.ReadDataSourceResponse {
|
|
input := request.Config.AsValueMap()
|
|
if _, ok := input["id"]; ok {
|
|
return providers.ReadDataSourceResponse{
|
|
State: request.Config,
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return providers.ReadDataSourceResponse{
|
|
State: cty.ObjectVal(map[string]cty.Value{
|
|
"id": cty.UnknownVal(cty.String),
|
|
}),
|
|
}
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
for name, test := range tests {
|
|
t.Run(name, func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
configs := testModuleInline(t, test.configs)
|
|
ctx := testContext2(t, &ContextOpts{
|
|
Providers: map[addrs.Provider]providers.Factory{
|
|
addrs.NewDefaultProvider(test.provider.Meta.(string)): testProviderFuncFixed(test.provider),
|
|
},
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
initialState := states.NewState()
|
|
if test.state != nil {
|
|
initialState = test.state
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
plan, diags := ctx.Plan(configs, initialState, &PlanOpts{
|
|
Mode: plans.NormalMode,
|
|
})
|
|
if validateCheckDiagnostics(t, "planning", test.planWarning, test.planError, diags) {
|
|
return
|
|
}
|
|
validateCheckResults(t, "planning", test.plan, plan.Checks)
|
|
|
|
if test.providerHook != nil {
|
|
// This gives an opportunity to change the behaviour of the
|
|
// provider between the plan and apply stages.
|
|
test.providerHook(test.provider)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
state, diags := ctx.Apply(plan, configs)
|
|
if validateCheckDiagnostics(t, "apply", test.applyWarning, test.applyError, diags) {
|
|
return
|
|
}
|
|
validateCheckResults(t, "apply", test.apply, state.CheckResults)
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func validateCheckDiagnostics(t *testing.T, stage string, expectedWarning, expectedError string, actual tfdiags.Diagnostics) bool {
|
|
if expectedError != "" {
|
|
if !actual.HasErrors() {
|
|
t.Errorf("expected %s to error with \"%s\", but no errors were returned", stage, expectedError)
|
|
} else if expectedError != actual.Err().Error() {
|
|
t.Errorf("expected %s to error with \"%s\" but found \"%s\"", stage, expectedError, actual.Err())
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// If we expected an error then we won't finish the rest of the test.
|
|
return true
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if expectedWarning != "" {
|
|
warnings := actual.ErrWithWarnings()
|
|
if actual.ErrWithWarnings() == nil {
|
|
t.Errorf("expected %s to warn with \"%s\", but no errors were returned", stage, expectedWarning)
|
|
} else if expectedWarning != warnings.Error() {
|
|
t.Errorf("expected %s to warn with \"%s\" but found \"%s\"", stage, expectedWarning, warnings)
|
|
}
|
|
} else {
|
|
if actual.ErrWithWarnings() != nil {
|
|
t.Errorf("expected %s to produce no diagnostics but found \"%s\"", stage, actual.ErrWithWarnings())
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
assertNoErrors(t, actual)
|
|
return false
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func validateCheckResults(t *testing.T, stage string, expected map[string]checksTestingStatus, actual *states.CheckResults) {
|
|
|
|
// Just a quick sanity check that the plan or apply process didn't create
|
|
// some non-existent checks.
|
|
if len(expected) != len(actual.ConfigResults.Keys()) {
|
|
t.Errorf("expected %d check results but found %d after %s", len(expected), len(actual.ConfigResults.Keys()), stage)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Now, lets make sure the checks all match what we expect.
|
|
for check, want := range expected {
|
|
results := actual.GetObjectResult(addrs.Check{
|
|
Name: check,
|
|
}.Absolute(addrs.RootModuleInstance))
|
|
|
|
if results.Status != want.status {
|
|
t.Errorf("%s: wanted %s but got %s after %s", check, want.status, results.Status, stage)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if len(want.messages) != len(results.FailureMessages) {
|
|
t.Errorf("%s: expected %d failure messages but had %d after %s", check, len(want.messages), len(results.FailureMessages), stage)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
max := len(want.messages)
|
|
if len(results.FailureMessages) > max {
|
|
max = len(results.FailureMessages)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for ix := 0; ix < max; ix++ {
|
|
var expected, actual string
|
|
if ix < len(want.messages) {
|
|
expected = want.messages[ix]
|
|
}
|
|
if ix < len(results.FailureMessages) {
|
|
actual = results.FailureMessages[ix]
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Order matters!
|
|
if actual != expected {
|
|
t.Errorf("%s: expected failure message at %d to be \"%s\" but was \"%s\" after %s", check, ix, expected, actual, stage)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
}
|