opentofu/plans
Kristin Laemmert 6a37ee9277 backend/local: more tests passing
I have no confidence in the change to plans/planfile/tfplan.go. The
tests were passing an empty backend config, which planfile  was able to
write to a file but not read from the same file. This change let me move
past that and it did not break any tests in the planfile package, but I
am concerned that it introduces undesired behavior.
2018-10-16 19:14:11 -07:00
..
internal/planproto core: Handle forced-create_before_destroy during the plan walk 2018-10-16 19:14:11 -07:00
objchange plans/objchange: further harden ProposedNewObject against ~weird~ 2018-10-16 19:14:11 -07:00
planfile backend/local: more tests passing 2018-10-16 19:14:11 -07:00
action_string.go plans: Regenerate Action.String for new action values 2018-10-16 19:14:11 -07:00
action.go core: Handle forced-create_before_destroy during the plan walk 2018-10-16 19:14:11 -07:00
changes_src.go plans: Retain output value changes for all outputs in memory 2018-10-16 19:14:11 -07:00
changes_state.go plans: New package for in-memory plan models 2018-10-16 18:50:29 -07:00
changes_sync.go plans: Retain output value changes for all outputs in memory 2018-10-16 19:14:11 -07:00
changes.go core: Handle forced-create_before_destroy during the plan walk 2018-10-16 19:14:11 -07:00
doc.go plans: New package for in-memory plan models 2018-10-16 18:50:29 -07:00
dynamic_value_test.go plans: New package for in-memory plan models 2018-10-16 18:50:29 -07:00
dynamic_value.go core: Re-implement EvalWriteDiff to work with new plan types 2018-10-16 19:14:11 -07:00
plan_test.go make Changes.Empty() not count NoOps 2018-10-16 19:14:11 -07:00
plan.go terraform: Ugly huge change to weave in new State and Plan types 2018-10-16 19:11:09 -07:00