Kristin Laemmert 6a37ee9277 backend/local: more tests passing ... I have no confidence in the change to plans/planfile/tfplan.go. The tests were passing an empty backend config, which planfile was able to write to a file but not read from the same file. This change let me move past that and it did not break any tests in the planfile package, but I am concerned that it introduces undesired behavior.		2018-10-16 19:14:11 -07:00
..
internal/planproto	core: Handle forced-create_before_destroy during the plan walk	2018-10-16 19:14:11 -07:00
objchange	plans/objchange: further harden ProposedNewObject against ~weird~	2018-10-16 19:14:11 -07:00
planfile	backend/local: more tests passing	2018-10-16 19:14:11 -07:00
action_string.go	plans: Regenerate Action.String for new action values	2018-10-16 19:14:11 -07:00
action.go	core: Handle forced-create_before_destroy during the plan walk	2018-10-16 19:14:11 -07:00
changes_src.go	plans: Retain output value changes for all outputs in memory	2018-10-16 19:14:11 -07:00
changes_state.go	plans: New package for in-memory plan models	2018-10-16 18:50:29 -07:00
changes_sync.go	plans: Retain output value changes for all outputs in memory	2018-10-16 19:14:11 -07:00
changes.go	core: Handle forced-create_before_destroy during the plan walk	2018-10-16 19:14:11 -07:00
doc.go	plans: New package for in-memory plan models	2018-10-16 18:50:29 -07:00
dynamic_value_test.go	plans: New package for in-memory plan models	2018-10-16 18:50:29 -07:00
dynamic_value.go	core: Re-implement EvalWriteDiff to work with new plan types	2018-10-16 19:14:11 -07:00
plan_test.go	make Changes.Empty() not count NoOps	2018-10-16 19:14:11 -07:00
plan.go	terraform: Ugly huge change to weave in new State and Plan types	2018-10-16 19:11:09 -07:00