opentofu/internal/lang/funcs/sensitive_test.go
2021-06-25 12:49:07 -04:00

180 lines
4.3 KiB
Go

package funcs
import (
"fmt"
"testing"
"github.com/hashicorp/terraform/internal/lang/marks"
"github.com/zclconf/go-cty/cty"
)
func TestSensitive(t *testing.T) {
tests := []struct {
Input cty.Value
WantErr string
}{
{
cty.NumberIntVal(1),
``,
},
{
// Unknown values stay unknown while becoming sensitive
cty.UnknownVal(cty.String),
``,
},
{
// Null values stay unknown while becoming sensitive
cty.NullVal(cty.String),
``,
},
{
// DynamicVal can be marked as sensitive
cty.DynamicVal,
``,
},
{
// The marking is shallow only
cty.ListVal([]cty.Value{cty.NumberIntVal(1)}),
``,
},
{
// A value already marked is allowed and stays marked
cty.NumberIntVal(1).Mark(marks.Sensitive),
``,
},
{
// A value with some non-standard mark gets "fixed" to be marked
// with the standard "sensitive" mark. (This situation occurring
// would imply an inconsistency/bug elsewhere, so we're just
// being robust about it here.)
cty.NumberIntVal(1).Mark("bloop"),
``,
},
{
// A value deep already marked is allowed and stays marked,
// _and_ we'll also mark the outer collection as sensitive.
cty.ListVal([]cty.Value{cty.NumberIntVal(1).Mark(marks.Sensitive)}),
``,
},
}
for _, test := range tests {
t.Run(fmt.Sprintf("sensitive(%#v)", test.Input), func(t *testing.T) {
got, err := Sensitive(test.Input)
if test.WantErr != "" {
if err == nil {
t.Fatal("succeeded; want error")
}
if got, want := err.Error(), test.WantErr; got != want {
t.Fatalf("wrong error\ngot: %s\nwant: %s", got, want)
}
return
} else if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unexpected error: %s", err)
}
if !got.HasMark(marks.Sensitive) {
t.Errorf("result is not marked sensitive")
}
gotRaw, gotMarks := got.Unmark()
if len(gotMarks) != 1 {
// We're only expecting to have the "sensitive" mark we checked
// above. Any others are an error, even if they happen to
// appear alongside "sensitive". (We might change this rule
// if someday we decide to use marks for some additional
// unrelated thing in Terraform, but currently we assume that
// _all_ marks imply sensitive, and so returning any other
// marks would be confusing.)
t.Errorf("extraneous marks %#v", gotMarks)
}
// Disregarding shallow marks, the result should have the same
// effective value as the input.
wantRaw, _ := test.Input.Unmark()
if !gotRaw.RawEquals(wantRaw) {
t.Errorf("wrong unmarked result\ngot: %#v\nwant: %#v", got, wantRaw)
}
})
}
}
func TestNonsensitive(t *testing.T) {
tests := []struct {
Input cty.Value
WantErr string
}{
{
cty.NumberIntVal(1).Mark(marks.Sensitive),
``,
},
{
cty.DynamicVal.Mark(marks.Sensitive),
``,
},
{
cty.UnknownVal(cty.String).Mark(marks.Sensitive),
``,
},
{
cty.NullVal(cty.EmptyObject).Mark(marks.Sensitive),
``,
},
{
// The inner sensitive remains afterwards
cty.ListVal([]cty.Value{cty.NumberIntVal(1).Mark(marks.Sensitive)}).Mark(marks.Sensitive),
``,
},
// Passing a value that is already non-sensitive is an error,
// because this function should always be used with specific
// intention, not just as a "make everything visible" hammer.
{
cty.NumberIntVal(1),
`the given value is not sensitive, so this call is redundant`,
},
{
cty.NullVal(cty.String),
`the given value is not sensitive, so this call is redundant`,
},
// Unknown values may become sensitive once they are known, so we
// permit them to be marked nonsensitive.
{
cty.DynamicVal,
``,
},
{
cty.UnknownVal(cty.String),
``,
},
}
for _, test := range tests {
t.Run(fmt.Sprintf("nonsensitive(%#v)", test.Input), func(t *testing.T) {
got, err := Nonsensitive(test.Input)
if test.WantErr != "" {
if err == nil {
t.Fatal("succeeded; want error")
}
if got, want := err.Error(), test.WantErr; got != want {
t.Fatalf("wrong error\ngot: %s\nwant: %s", got, want)
}
return
} else if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unexpected error: %s", err)
}
if got.HasMark(marks.Sensitive) {
t.Errorf("result is still marked sensitive")
}
wantRaw, _ := test.Input.Unmark()
if !got.RawEquals(wantRaw) {
t.Errorf("wrong result\ngot: %#v\nwant: %#v", got, test.Input)
}
})
}
}