- allow multi-paragraph contents in grid table merged cells
- allow code-blocks in merged cells
- allow generally speaking reST contents allowed in regular
cells to be also allowed in merged cells, whether multirow,
multicolumn, or both.
This is made possible by custom LaTeX macros replacing original
``\multicolumn`` and ``\multirow`` (none of the originals allows
verbatim contents as is needed for code-blocks). They are defined in
bundled LaTeX style file sphinxmulticell.sty. The multicolumn merged
cells give much better results with tabulary as it is coerced into
taking them into account in its automatic width algorithm.
This deprecates use of LaTeX packages eqparbox and multirow, which are
not needed anymore.
New config setting ``latex_use_latex_multicolumn`` (default value False,
currently) as custom Sphinx multicolumn is not fully compatible will all
types of custom table col specs which may be inserted via tabularcolumns
directive. It works best with standard ``|`` column separator.
The default tabulary column specifier has been changed from L
(flushleft) to J (justifying). Internally the column type is called T,
so ``r'\newcolumntype{T}{L}'`` in preamble key recovers the former
behaviour. A ``\Y`` column type is defined which admits one decimal
argument in place of the two integers for ``\X``.
At present, the 'builder' option for the setuptools integration only
supports a single output format, typically HTML, like so:
[build_sphinx]
builder = man
There is value in being able to specify multiple format, like so:
[build_sphinx]
builder = html man
Make this possible.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Finucane <stephen@that.guru>
While this feature is somewhat documented in the API guide, there's
nothing about this option in the main user guide. Given the lack of
blogs and articles talking about this feature, along with the amount of
projects that are only using the same copy-paste '[build_sphinx]'
definition, I imagine this is an issue.
Make the feature a little more accessible by adding a section to the
main user guide that details (a) the fact the feature exists, (b) why
you'd want to use it, and (c) how you can use it.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Finucane <stephen@that.guru>
This reverts commit 839e924808.
Indeed, it is better not to document how to use ``lines`` with
``start-after`` now if this is to be changed at next major release (refs