mirror of
https://github.com/libvirt/libvirt.git
synced 2025-02-25 18:55:26 -06:00
docs: Refer to virReportOOMError in the HACKING file
Instead of refering to __virRaiseError(VIR_ERROR_NO_MEMORY).
This commit is contained in:
@@ -192,8 +192,8 @@
|
||||
virDomainPtr domain;
|
||||
|
||||
if (VIR_ALLOC(domain) < 0) {
|
||||
__virRaiseError(VIR_ERROR_NO_MEMORY)
|
||||
return NULL;
|
||||
virReportOOMError(NULL);
|
||||
return NULL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
</pre></li>
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -204,8 +204,8 @@
|
||||
int ndomains = 10;
|
||||
|
||||
if (VIR_ALLOC_N(domains, ndomains) < 0) {
|
||||
__virRaiseError(VIR_ERROR_NO_MEMORY)
|
||||
return NULL;
|
||||
virReportOOMError(NULL);
|
||||
return NULL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
</pre></li>
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -216,8 +216,8 @@
|
||||
int ndomains = 10;
|
||||
|
||||
if (VIR_ALLOC_N(domains, ndomains) < 0) {
|
||||
__virRaiseError(VIR_ERROR_NO_MEMORY)
|
||||
return NULL;
|
||||
virReportOOMError(NULL);
|
||||
return NULL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
</pre></li>
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -227,8 +227,8 @@
|
||||
ndomains = 20
|
||||
|
||||
if (VIR_REALLOC_N(domains, ndomains) < 0) {
|
||||
__virRaiseError(VIR_ERROR_NO_MEMORY)
|
||||
return NULL;
|
||||
virReportOOMError(NULL);
|
||||
return NULL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
</pre></li>
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -314,7 +314,7 @@
|
||||
|
||||
if (virBufferError(&buf)) {
|
||||
virBufferFreeAndReset(&buf);
|
||||
virReportOOMError(...);
|
||||
virReportOOMError(NULL);
|
||||
return NULL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -419,7 +419,7 @@
|
||||
<li>if a recently commited patch breaks compilation on a platform
|
||||
or for a given driver then it's fine to commit a minimal fix
|
||||
directly without getting the review feedback first</li>
|
||||
<li>if make check or make syntax-chek breaks, if there is
|
||||
<li>if make check or make syntax-check breaks, if there is
|
||||
an obvious fix, it's fine to commit immediately.
|
||||
The patch should still be sent to the list (or tell what the fix was if
|
||||
trivial) and 'make check syntax-check' should pass too before commiting
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user