mirror of
https://github.com/memtest86plus/memtest86plus.git
synced 2024-11-23 08:26:23 -06:00
5a2bc4c960
If the memory map contains very small segments and we have many active CPUs, the tests that split the segments into chunks distributed across the CPUs may end up with chunks that are too small for the test algorithm. With 4K pages and the current limit of 256 active CPUs, this is currently only a problem for the block move and modulo-n tests, but if we ever support more than 512 active CPUs, it could affect the other tests too. For now, just skip segments that are too small in the affected tests. As it only affects the block move and modulo-n tests and only affects very small regions of memory, the loss of test coverage is negligable. This may fix issue #216.
173 lines
5.4 KiB
C
173 lines
5.4 KiB
C
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
|
|
// Copyright (C) 2020-2022 Martin Whitaker.
|
|
//
|
|
// Derived from an extract of memtest86+ test.c:
|
|
//
|
|
// MemTest86+ V5 Specific code (GPL V2.0)
|
|
// By Samuel DEMEULEMEESTER, sdemeule@memtest.org
|
|
// http://www.canardpc.com - http://www.memtest.org
|
|
// Thanks to Passmark for calculate_chunk() and various comments !
|
|
// ----------------------------------------------------
|
|
// test.c - MemTest-86 Version 3.4
|
|
//
|
|
// Released under version 2 of the Gnu Public License.
|
|
// By Chris Brady
|
|
|
|
#include <stdbool.h>
|
|
#include <stdint.h>
|
|
|
|
#include "display.h"
|
|
#include "error.h"
|
|
#include "test.h"
|
|
|
|
#include "test_funcs.h"
|
|
#include "test_helper.h"
|
|
|
|
#define HAND_OPTIMISED 1 // Use hand-optimised assembler code for performance.
|
|
|
|
//------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
// Public Functions
|
|
//------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
int test_mov_inv_fixed(int my_cpu, int iterations, testword_t pattern1, testword_t pattern2)
|
|
{
|
|
int ticks = 0;
|
|
|
|
if (my_cpu == master_cpu) {
|
|
display_test_pattern_value(pattern1);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Initialize memory with the initial pattern.
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < vm_map_size; i++) {
|
|
testword_t *start, *end;
|
|
calculate_chunk(&start, &end, my_cpu, i, sizeof(testword_t));
|
|
if (end < start) continue; // we need at least one word for this test
|
|
|
|
testword_t *p = start;
|
|
testword_t *pe = start;
|
|
|
|
bool at_end = false;
|
|
do {
|
|
// take care to avoid pointer overflow
|
|
if ((end - pe) >= SPIN_SIZE) {
|
|
pe += SPIN_SIZE - 1;
|
|
} else {
|
|
at_end = true;
|
|
pe = end;
|
|
}
|
|
ticks++;
|
|
if (my_cpu < 0) {
|
|
continue;
|
|
}
|
|
test_addr[my_cpu] = (uintptr_t)p;
|
|
#if HAND_OPTIMISED
|
|
#ifdef __x86_64__
|
|
uint64_t length = pe - p + 1;
|
|
__asm__ __volatile__ ("\t"
|
|
"rep \n\t"
|
|
"stosq \n\t"
|
|
:
|
|
: "c" (length), "D" (p), "a" (pattern1)
|
|
:
|
|
);
|
|
p = pe;
|
|
#else
|
|
uint32_t length = pe - p + 1;
|
|
__asm__ __volatile__ ("\t"
|
|
"rep \n\t"
|
|
"stosl \n\t"
|
|
:
|
|
: "c" (length), "D" (p), "a" (pattern1)
|
|
:
|
|
);
|
|
p = pe;
|
|
#endif
|
|
#else
|
|
do {
|
|
write_word(p, pattern1);
|
|
} while (p++ < pe); // test before increment in case pointer overflows
|
|
#endif
|
|
do_tick(my_cpu);
|
|
BAILOUT;
|
|
} while (!at_end && ++pe); // advance pe to next start point
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Check for the current pattern and then write the alternate pattern for
|
|
// each memory location. Test from the bottom up and then from the top down.
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < iterations; i++) {
|
|
flush_caches(my_cpu);
|
|
|
|
for (int j = 0; j < vm_map_size; j++) {
|
|
testword_t *start, *end;
|
|
calculate_chunk(&start, &end, my_cpu, j, sizeof(testword_t));
|
|
if (end < start) continue; // we need at least one word for this test
|
|
|
|
testword_t *p = start;
|
|
testword_t *pe = start;
|
|
|
|
bool at_end = false;
|
|
do {
|
|
// take care to avoid pointer overflow
|
|
if ((end - pe) >= SPIN_SIZE) {
|
|
pe += SPIN_SIZE - 1;
|
|
} else {
|
|
at_end = true;
|
|
pe = end;
|
|
}
|
|
ticks++;
|
|
if (my_cpu < 0) {
|
|
continue;
|
|
}
|
|
test_addr[my_cpu] = (uintptr_t)p;
|
|
do {
|
|
testword_t actual = read_word(p);
|
|
if (unlikely(actual != pattern1)) {
|
|
data_error(p, pattern1, actual, true);
|
|
}
|
|
write_word(p, pattern2);
|
|
} while (p++ < pe); // test before increment in case pointer overflows
|
|
do_tick(my_cpu);
|
|
BAILOUT;
|
|
} while (!at_end && ++pe); // advance pe to next start point
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
flush_caches(my_cpu);
|
|
|
|
for (int j = vm_map_size - 1; j >= 0; j--) {
|
|
testword_t *start, *end;
|
|
calculate_chunk(&start, &end, my_cpu, j, sizeof(testword_t));
|
|
if (end < start) continue; // we need at least one word for this test
|
|
|
|
testword_t *p = end;
|
|
testword_t *ps = end;
|
|
|
|
bool at_start = false;
|
|
do {
|
|
// take care to avoid pointer underflow
|
|
if ((ps - start) >= SPIN_SIZE) {
|
|
ps -= SPIN_SIZE - 1;
|
|
} else {
|
|
at_start = true;
|
|
ps = start;
|
|
}
|
|
ticks++;
|
|
if (my_cpu < 0) {
|
|
continue;
|
|
}
|
|
test_addr[my_cpu] = (uintptr_t)p;
|
|
do {
|
|
testword_t actual = read_word(p);
|
|
if (unlikely(actual != pattern2)) {
|
|
data_error(p, pattern2, actual, true);
|
|
}
|
|
write_word(p, pattern1);
|
|
} while (p-- > ps); // test before decrement in case pointer overflows
|
|
do_tick(my_cpu);
|
|
BAILOUT;
|
|
} while (!at_start && --ps); // advance ps to next start point
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return ticks;
|
|
}
|