fix capillary number bug for flux bc

This commit is contained in:
James McClure 2021-09-04 09:49:12 -04:00
parent d3a14c21ff
commit 0b183a98ed

View File

@ -198,22 +198,12 @@ void ScaLBL_ColorModel::ReadParams(string filename){
domain_db->putScalar<int>( "BC", BoundaryCondition );
}
else if (protocol == "core flooding"){
if (rank == 0) printf("Using core flooding protocol \n");
if (rank == 0) printf("Using core flooding protocol \n");
if (BoundaryCondition != 4){
BoundaryCondition = 4;
if (rank==0) printf("WARNING: protocol (core flooding) supports only volumetric flux boundary condition \n");
}
domain_db->putScalar<int>( "BC", BoundaryCondition );
if (color_db->keyExists( "capillary_number" )){
double capillary_number = color_db->getScalar<double>( "capillary_number" );
if (rank==0) printf(" set flux to achieve Ca=%f \n", capillary_number);
double MuB = rhoB*(tauB - 0.5)/3.0;
double IFT = 6.0*alpha;
//double CrossSectionalArea = (double) (nprocx*(Nx-2)*nprocy*(Ny-2));
flux = Dm->Porosity()*nprocx*(Nx-2)*nprocy*(Ny-2)*IFT*capillary_number/MuB;
if (rank==0) printf(" flux=%f \n",flux);
}
color_db->putScalar<double>( "flux", flux );
}
}
@ -493,6 +483,18 @@ void ScaLBL_ColorModel::Create(){
void ScaLBL_ColorModel::Initialize(){
/* if both capillary number and flux BC are specified */
if (color_db->keyExists( "capillary_number" ) && BoundaryCondition == 4){
double capillary_number = color_db->getScalar<double>( "capillary_number" );
if (rank==0) printf(" set flux to achieve Ca=%f \n", capillary_number);
double MuB = rhoB*(tauB - 0.5)/3.0;
double IFT = 6.0*alpha;
double CrossSectionalArea = (double) (nprocx*(Nx-2)*nprocy*(Ny-2));
flux = Mask->Porosity()*CrossSectionalArea*(Ny-2)*IFT*capillary_number/MuB;
if (rank==0) printf(" flux=%f \n",flux);
}
color_db->putScalar<double>( "flux", flux );
if (rank==0) printf ("Initializing distributions \n");
ScaLBL_D3Q19_Init(fq, Np);
/*