python bindings, adding support for UDA type
This commit is contained in:
Torbjørn Skille
parent
8a4240b2fe
commit
07a8c5b015
@ -137,6 +137,13 @@ namespace Opm {
|
||||
const std::vector<Dimension>& activeDimensions() const;
|
||||
const std::vector<Dimension>& defaultDimensions() const;
|
||||
|
||||
bool is_uda() { return (type == get_type< UDAValue >()); };
|
||||
bool is_double() { return type == get_type< double >(); };
|
||||
bool is_int() { return type == get_type< int >() ; };
|
||||
bool is_string() { return type == get_type< std::string >(); };
|
||||
|
||||
UDAValue& get_uda() { return uval[0]; };
|
||||
|
||||
private:
|
||||
mutable std::vector< double > dval;
|
||||
std::vector< int > ival;
|
||||
|
||||
@ -64,6 +64,9 @@ public:
|
||||
|
||||
bool operator==(const UDAValue& other) const;
|
||||
bool operator!=(const UDAValue& other) const;
|
||||
|
||||
bool is_numeric() { return numeric_value; }
|
||||
|
||||
private:
|
||||
bool numeric_value;
|
||||
double double_value;
|
||||
|
||||
@ -110,8 +110,30 @@ py::array_t<double> get_SI_array(const DeckKeyword& kw) {
|
||||
return convert::numpy_array( kw.getSIDoubleData() );
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
bool uda_item_is_numeric(DeckItem * item)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if( !item->is_uda() )
|
||||
throw std::logic_error("deck item doesn't support user defined quantities");
|
||||
|
||||
UDAValue uda = item->get_uda();
|
||||
|
||||
return uda.is_numeric();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
double get_uda_double(DeckItem * item)
|
||||
{
|
||||
UDAValue uda = item->get_uda();
|
||||
return uda.get<double>();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
std::string get_uda_str(DeckItem * item)
|
||||
{
|
||||
UDAValue uda = item->get_uda();
|
||||
return uda.get<std::string>();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
}
|
||||
void python::common::export_DeckKeyword(py::module& module) {
|
||||
py::class_< DeckKeyword >( module, "DeckKeyword")
|
||||
.def(py::init<const ParserKeyword& >())
|
||||
@ -186,6 +208,10 @@ void python::common::export_DeckKeyword(py::module& module) {
|
||||
|
||||
py::class_< DeckItem >(module, "DeckItem")
|
||||
.def( "__len__", &DeckItem::data_size )
|
||||
.def("is_uda", &DeckItem::is_uda)
|
||||
.def("is_double", &DeckItem::is_double)
|
||||
.def("is_int", &DeckItem::is_int)
|
||||
.def("is_string", &DeckItem::is_string)
|
||||
.def("get_str", &DeckItem::get<std::string>)
|
||||
.def("get_int", &DeckItem::get<int>)
|
||||
.def("get_raw", &DeckItem::get<double>)
|
||||
@ -193,8 +219,11 @@ void python::common::export_DeckKeyword(py::module& module) {
|
||||
.def("get_data_list", &item_to_pylist)
|
||||
.def("get_raw_data_list", &raw_data_to_pylist)
|
||||
.def("get_SI_data_list", &SI_data_to_pylist)
|
||||
.def("has_value", &DeckItem::hasValue)
|
||||
.def("defaulted", &DeckItem::defaultApplied)
|
||||
.def("__has_value", &DeckItem::hasValue)
|
||||
.def("__defaulted", &DeckItem::defaultApplied)
|
||||
.def("__is_numberic", &uda_item_is_numeric)
|
||||
.def("__uda_double", &get_uda_double)
|
||||
.def("__uda_str", &get_uda_str)
|
||||
;
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ from .libopmcommon_python import action
|
||||
|
||||
from .libopmcommon_python import Parser, ParseContext
|
||||
from .libopmcommon_python import DeckKeyword
|
||||
from .libopmcommon_python import DeckItem
|
||||
|
||||
from .libopmcommon_python import EclipseState
|
||||
from .libopmcommon_python import FieldProperties
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1 +1,40 @@
|
||||
from opm._common import DeckKeyword
|
||||
from opm._common import DeckItem
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# in prinsiple it should be possible to use the has_value(int) function
|
||||
# on not only the first element. However, in 99% of the use cases it is the
|
||||
# first element which is of interesst. Hence for python bindings this is
|
||||
# hardcoded to the first element
|
||||
|
||||
@property
|
||||
def defaulted_deckitem(self):
|
||||
return self.__defaulted(0)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@property
|
||||
def has_value_deckitem(self):
|
||||
return self.__has_value(0)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@property
|
||||
def get_item_deckitem(self):
|
||||
|
||||
if self.is_int():
|
||||
return self.get_int(0)
|
||||
elif self.is_string():
|
||||
return self.get_str(0)
|
||||
elif self.is_double():
|
||||
return self.get_raw(0)
|
||||
elif self.is_uda():
|
||||
if self.__is_numberic():
|
||||
return self.__uda_double()
|
||||
else:
|
||||
return self.__uda_str()
|
||||
else:
|
||||
raise ValueError("Deck Item, unknown type")
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
setattr(DeckItem, "defaulted", defaulted_deckitem)
|
||||
setattr(DeckItem, "valid", has_value_deckitem)
|
||||
setattr(DeckItem, "value", get_item_deckitem)
|
||||
|
||||
480
python/tests/data/SPE1CASE1.DATA
Normal file
480
python/tests/data/SPE1CASE1.DATA
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,480 @@
|
||||
-- This reservoir simulation deck is made available under the Open Database
|
||||
-- License: http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/. Any rights in
|
||||
-- individual contents of the database are licensed under the Database Contents
|
||||
-- License: http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/dbcl/1.0/
|
||||
|
||||
-- Copyright (C) 2015 Statoil
|
||||
|
||||
-- This simulation is based on the data given in
|
||||
-- 'Comparison of Solutions to a Three-Dimensional
|
||||
-- Black-Oil Reservoir Simulation Problem' by Aziz S. Odeh,
|
||||
-- Journal of Petroleum Technology, January 1981
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
------------------------ SPE1 - CASE 1 ------------------------------------
|
||||
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
RUNSPEC
|
||||
-- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
TITLE
|
||||
SPE1 - CASE 1
|
||||
|
||||
DIMENS
|
||||
10 10 3 /
|
||||
|
||||
-- The number of equilibration regions is inferred from the EQLDIMS
|
||||
-- keyword.
|
||||
EQLDIMS
|
||||
/
|
||||
|
||||
-- The number of PVTW tables is inferred from the TABDIMS keyword;
|
||||
-- when no data is included in the keyword the default values are used.
|
||||
TABDIMS
|
||||
/
|
||||
|
||||
REGDIMS
|
||||
2 /
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
OIL
|
||||
GAS
|
||||
WATER
|
||||
DISGAS
|
||||
-- As seen from figure 4 in Odeh, GOR is increasing with time,
|
||||
-- which means that dissolved gas is present
|
||||
|
||||
FIELD
|
||||
|
||||
START
|
||||
1 'JAN' 2015 /
|
||||
|
||||
WELLDIMS
|
||||
-- Item 1: maximum number of wells in the model
|
||||
-- - there are two wells in the problem; injector and producer
|
||||
-- Item 2: maximum number of grid blocks connected to any one well
|
||||
-- - must be one as the wells are located at specific grid blocks
|
||||
-- Item 3: maximum number of groups in the model
|
||||
-- - we are dealing with only one 'group'
|
||||
-- Item 4: maximum number of wells in any one group
|
||||
-- - there must be two wells in a group as there are two wells in total
|
||||
2 1 1 2 /
|
||||
|
||||
UNIFOUT
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
UDQDIMS
|
||||
16 16 0 16 16 0 0 50 0 20 /
|
||||
|
||||
-- Dimensions for the user defined arguments facility
|
||||
-- number of keyword arguments in which UDQs replace numerical values
|
||||
-- ratained for back-compatibility
|
||||
-- total number of unique instances in which a UDQ is used in a keyword argument
|
||||
UDADIMS
|
||||
10 1* 10 /
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
GRID
|
||||
|
||||
-- The INIT keyword is used to request an .INIT file. The .INIT file
|
||||
-- is written before the simulation actually starts, and contains grid
|
||||
-- properties and saturation tables as inferred from the input
|
||||
-- deck. There are no other keywords which can be used to configure
|
||||
-- exactly what is written to the .INIT file.
|
||||
INIT
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
-- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
NOECHO
|
||||
|
||||
DX
|
||||
-- There are in total 300 cells with length 1000ft in x-direction
|
||||
300*1000 /
|
||||
DY
|
||||
-- There are in total 300 cells with length 1000ft in y-direction
|
||||
300*1000 /
|
||||
DZ
|
||||
-- The layers are 20, 30 and 50 ft thick, in each layer there are 100 cells
|
||||
100*20 100*30 100*50 /
|
||||
|
||||
TOPS
|
||||
-- The depth of the top of each grid block
|
||||
100*8325 /
|
||||
|
||||
PORO
|
||||
-- Constant porosity of 0.3 throughout all 300 grid cells
|
||||
300*0.3 /
|
||||
|
||||
PERMX
|
||||
-- The layers have perm. 500mD, 50mD and 200mD, respectively.
|
||||
100*500 100*50 100*200 /
|
||||
|
||||
PERMY
|
||||
-- Equal to PERMX
|
||||
100*500 100*50 100*200 /
|
||||
|
||||
PERMZ
|
||||
-- Cannot find perm. in z-direction in Odeh's paper
|
||||
-- For the time being, we will assume PERMZ equal to PERMX and PERMY:
|
||||
100*500 100*50 100*200 /
|
||||
ECHO
|
||||
|
||||
PROPS
|
||||
-- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
PVTW
|
||||
-- Item 1: pressure reference (psia)
|
||||
-- Item 2: water FVF (rb per bbl or rb per stb)
|
||||
-- Item 3: water compressibility (psi^{-1})
|
||||
-- Item 4: water viscosity (cp)
|
||||
-- Item 5: water 'viscosibility' (psi^{-1})
|
||||
|
||||
-- Using values from Norne:
|
||||
-- In METRIC units:
|
||||
-- 277.0 1.038 4.67E-5 0.318 0.0 /
|
||||
-- In FIELD units:
|
||||
4017.55 1.038 3.22E-6 0.318 0.0 /
|
||||
|
||||
ROCK
|
||||
-- Item 1: reference pressure (psia)
|
||||
-- Item 2: rock compressibility (psi^{-1})
|
||||
|
||||
-- Using values from table 1 in Odeh:
|
||||
14.7 3E-6 /
|
||||
|
||||
SWOF
|
||||
-- Column 1: water saturation
|
||||
-- - this has been set to (almost) equally spaced values from 0.12 to 1
|
||||
-- Column 2: water relative permeability
|
||||
-- - generated from the Corey-type approx. formula
|
||||
-- the coeffisient is set to 10e-5, S_{orw}=0 and S_{wi}=0.12
|
||||
-- Column 3: oil relative permeability when only oil and water are present
|
||||
-- - we will use the same values as in column 3 in SGOF.
|
||||
-- This is not really correct, but since only the first
|
||||
-- two values are of importance, this does not really matter
|
||||
-- Column 4: water-oil capillary pressure (psi)
|
||||
|
||||
0.12 0 1 0
|
||||
0.18 4.64876033057851E-008 1 0
|
||||
0.24 0.000000186 0.997 0
|
||||
0.3 4.18388429752066E-007 0.98 0
|
||||
0.36 7.43801652892562E-007 0.7 0
|
||||
0.42 1.16219008264463E-006 0.35 0
|
||||
0.48 1.67355371900826E-006 0.2 0
|
||||
0.54 2.27789256198347E-006 0.09 0
|
||||
0.6 2.97520661157025E-006 0.021 0
|
||||
0.66 3.7654958677686E-006 0.01 0
|
||||
0.72 4.64876033057851E-006 0.001 0
|
||||
0.78 0.000005625 0.0001 0
|
||||
0.84 6.69421487603306E-006 0 0
|
||||
0.91 8.05914256198347E-006 0 0
|
||||
1 0.00001 0 0 /
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
SGOF
|
||||
-- Column 1: gas saturation
|
||||
-- Column 2: gas relative permeability
|
||||
-- Column 3: oil relative permeability when oil, gas and connate water are present
|
||||
-- Column 4: oil-gas capillary pressure (psi)
|
||||
-- - stated to be zero in Odeh's paper
|
||||
|
||||
-- Values in column 1-3 are taken from table 3 in Odeh's paper:
|
||||
0 0 1 0
|
||||
0.001 0 1 0
|
||||
0.02 0 0.997 0
|
||||
0.05 0.005 0.980 0
|
||||
0.12 0.025 0.700 0
|
||||
0.2 0.075 0.350 0
|
||||
0.25 0.125 0.200 0
|
||||
0.3 0.190 0.090 0
|
||||
0.4 0.410 0.021 0
|
||||
0.45 0.60 0.010 0
|
||||
0.5 0.72 0.001 0
|
||||
0.6 0.87 0.0001 0
|
||||
0.7 0.94 0.000 0
|
||||
0.85 0.98 0.000 0
|
||||
0.88 0.984 0.000 0 /
|
||||
--1.00 1.0 0.000 0 /
|
||||
-- Warning from Eclipse: first sat. value in SWOF + last sat. value in SGOF
|
||||
-- must not be greater than 1, but Eclipse still runs
|
||||
-- Flow needs the sum to be excactly 1 so I added a row with gas sat. = 0.88
|
||||
-- The corresponding krg value was estimated by assuming linear rel. between
|
||||
-- gas sat. and krw. between gas sat. 0.85 and 1.00 (the last two values given)
|
||||
|
||||
DENSITY
|
||||
-- Density (lb per ft³) at surface cond. of
|
||||
-- oil, water and gas, respectively (in that order)
|
||||
|
||||
-- Using values from Norne:
|
||||
-- In METRIC units:
|
||||
-- 859.5 1033.0 0.854 /
|
||||
-- In FIELD units:
|
||||
53.66 64.49 0.0533 /
|
||||
|
||||
PVDG
|
||||
-- Column 1: gas phase pressure (psia)
|
||||
-- Column 2: gas formation volume factor (rb per Mscf)
|
||||
-- - in Odeh's paper the units are said to be given in rb per bbl,
|
||||
-- but this is assumed to be a mistake: FVF-values in Odeh's paper
|
||||
-- are given in rb per scf, not rb per bbl. This will be in
|
||||
-- agreement with conventions
|
||||
-- Column 3: gas viscosity (cP)
|
||||
|
||||
-- Using values from lower right table in Odeh's table 2:
|
||||
14.700 166.666 0.008000
|
||||
264.70 12.0930 0.009600
|
||||
514.70 6.27400 0.011200
|
||||
1014.7 3.19700 0.014000
|
||||
2014.7 1.61400 0.018900
|
||||
2514.7 1.29400 0.020800
|
||||
3014.7 1.08000 0.022800
|
||||
4014.7 0.81100 0.026800
|
||||
5014.7 0.64900 0.030900
|
||||
9014.7 0.38600 0.047000 /
|
||||
|
||||
PVTO
|
||||
-- Column 1: dissolved gas-oil ratio (Mscf per stb)
|
||||
-- Column 2: bubble point pressure (psia)
|
||||
-- Column 3: oil FVF for saturated oil (rb per stb)
|
||||
-- Column 4: oil viscosity for saturated oil (cP)
|
||||
|
||||
-- Use values from top left table in Odeh's table 2:
|
||||
0.0010 14.7 1.0620 1.0400 /
|
||||
0.0905 264.7 1.1500 0.9750 /
|
||||
0.1800 514.7 1.2070 0.9100 /
|
||||
0.3710 1014.7 1.2950 0.8300 /
|
||||
0.6360 2014.7 1.4350 0.6950 /
|
||||
0.7750 2514.7 1.5000 0.6410 /
|
||||
0.9300 3014.7 1.5650 0.5940 /
|
||||
1.2700 4014.7 1.6950 0.5100
|
||||
9014.7 1.5790 0.7400 /
|
||||
1.6180 5014.7 1.8270 0.4490
|
||||
9014.7 1.7370 0.6310 /
|
||||
-- It is required to enter data for undersaturated oil for the highest GOR
|
||||
-- (i.e. the last row) in the PVTO table.
|
||||
-- In order to fulfill this requirement, values for oil FVF and viscosity
|
||||
-- at 9014.7psia and GOR=1.618 for undersaturated oil have been approximated:
|
||||
-- It has been assumed that there is a linear relation between the GOR
|
||||
-- and the FVF when keeping the pressure constant at 9014.7psia.
|
||||
-- From Odeh we know that (at 9014.7psia) the FVF is 2.357 at GOR=2.984
|
||||
-- for saturated oil and that the FVF is 1.579 at GOR=1.27 for undersaturated oil,
|
||||
-- so it is possible to use the assumption described above.
|
||||
-- An equivalent approximation for the viscosity has been used.
|
||||
/
|
||||
|
||||
REGIONS
|
||||
|
||||
EQLNUM
|
||||
300*1 /
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
FIPNUM
|
||||
100*1 100* 100*2 /
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
SOLUTION
|
||||
-- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
EQUIL
|
||||
-- Item 1: datum depth (ft)
|
||||
-- Item 2: pressure at datum depth (psia)
|
||||
-- - Odeh's table 1 says that initial reservoir pressure is
|
||||
-- 4800 psi at 8400ft, which explains choice of item 1 and 2
|
||||
-- Item 3: depth of water-oil contact (ft)
|
||||
-- - chosen to be directly under the reservoir
|
||||
-- Item 4: oil-water capillary pressure at the water oil contact (psi)
|
||||
-- - given to be 0 in Odeh's paper
|
||||
-- Item 5: depth of gas-oil contact (ft)
|
||||
-- - chosen to be directly above the reservoir
|
||||
-- Item 6: gas-oil capillary pressure at gas-oil contact (psi)
|
||||
-- - given to be 0 in Odeh's paper
|
||||
-- Item 7: RSVD-table
|
||||
-- Item 8: RVVD-table
|
||||
-- Item 9: Set to 0 as this is the only value supported by OPM
|
||||
|
||||
-- Item #: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
|
||||
8400 4800 8450 0 8300 0 1 0 0 /
|
||||
|
||||
RSVD
|
||||
-- Dissolved GOR is initially constant with depth through the reservoir.
|
||||
-- The reason is that the initial reservoir pressure given is higher
|
||||
---than the bubble point presssure of 4014.7psia, meaning that there is no
|
||||
-- free gas initially present.
|
||||
8300 1.270
|
||||
8450 1.270 /
|
||||
|
||||
SUMMARY
|
||||
-- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
-- 1a) Oil rate vs time
|
||||
FOPR
|
||||
-- Field Oil Production Rate
|
||||
|
||||
-- 1b) GOR vs time
|
||||
WGOR
|
||||
-- Well Gas-Oil Ratio
|
||||
'PROD'
|
||||
/
|
||||
-- Using FGOR instead of WGOR:PROD results in the same graph
|
||||
FGOR
|
||||
|
||||
-- 2a) Pressures of the cell where the injector and producer are located
|
||||
BPR
|
||||
1 1 1 /
|
||||
10 10 3 /
|
||||
/
|
||||
|
||||
-- 2b) Gas saturation at grid points given in Odeh's paper
|
||||
BGSAT
|
||||
1 1 1 /
|
||||
1 1 2 /
|
||||
1 1 3 /
|
||||
10 1 1 /
|
||||
10 1 2 /
|
||||
10 1 3 /
|
||||
10 10 1 /
|
||||
10 10 2 /
|
||||
10 10 3 /
|
||||
/
|
||||
|
||||
-- In order to compare Eclipse with Flow:
|
||||
WBHP
|
||||
'INJ'
|
||||
'PROD'
|
||||
/
|
||||
WGIR
|
||||
'INJ'
|
||||
'PROD'
|
||||
/
|
||||
WGIT
|
||||
'INJ'
|
||||
'PROD'
|
||||
/
|
||||
WGPR
|
||||
'INJ'
|
||||
'PROD'
|
||||
/
|
||||
WGPT
|
||||
'INJ'
|
||||
'PROD'
|
||||
/
|
||||
WOIR
|
||||
'INJ'
|
||||
'PROD'
|
||||
/
|
||||
WOIT
|
||||
'INJ'
|
||||
'PROD'
|
||||
/
|
||||
WOPR
|
||||
'INJ'
|
||||
'PROD'
|
||||
/
|
||||
WOPT
|
||||
'INJ'
|
||||
'PROD'
|
||||
/
|
||||
WWIR
|
||||
'INJ'
|
||||
'PROD'
|
||||
/
|
||||
WWIT
|
||||
'INJ'
|
||||
'PROD'
|
||||
/
|
||||
WWPR
|
||||
'INJ'
|
||||
'PROD'
|
||||
/
|
||||
WWPT
|
||||
'INJ'
|
||||
'PROD'
|
||||
/
|
||||
|
||||
WUOPRL
|
||||
'PROD' /
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
SCHEDULE
|
||||
-- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
UDQ
|
||||
-- test
|
||||
--oil & liquid capacities at GEFAC = 0.8995
|
||||
DEFINE WUOPRL (20000 - TIME * 2.5) /
|
||||
-- units
|
||||
UNITS WUOPRL SM3/DAY /
|
||||
--
|
||||
/
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
RPTSCHED
|
||||
'PRES' 'SGAS' 'RS' 'WELLS' 'WELSPECS' /
|
||||
|
||||
RPTRST
|
||||
'BASIC=1' /
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
-- If no resolution (i.e. case 1), the two following lines must be added:
|
||||
DRSDT
|
||||
0 /
|
||||
-- if DRSDT is set to 0, GOR cannot rise and free gas does not
|
||||
-- dissolve in undersaturated oil -> constant bubble point pressure
|
||||
|
||||
WELSPECS
|
||||
-- Item #: 1 2 3 4 5 6
|
||||
'PROD' 'G1' 10 10 8400 'OIL' /
|
||||
'INJ' 'G1' 1 1 8335 'GAS' /
|
||||
/
|
||||
-- Coordinates in item 3-4 are retrieved from Odeh's figure 1 and 2
|
||||
-- Note that the depth at the midpoint of the well grid blocks
|
||||
-- has been used as reference depth for bottom hole pressure in item 5
|
||||
|
||||
COMPDAT
|
||||
-- Item #: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
|
||||
'PROD' 10 10 3 3 'OPEN' 1* 1* 0.5 /
|
||||
'INJ' 1 1 1 1 'OPEN' 1* 1* 0.5 /
|
||||
/
|
||||
-- Coordinates in item 2-5 are retreived from Odeh's figure 1 and 2
|
||||
-- Item 9 is the well bore internal diameter,
|
||||
-- the radius is given to be 0.25ft in Odeh's paper
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
WCONPROD
|
||||
-- Item #:1 2 3 4 5 9
|
||||
'PROD' 'OPEN' 'ORAT' WUOPRL 1* 1.5E5 2* 1000 /
|
||||
/
|
||||
-- It is stated in Odeh's paper that the maximum oil prod. rate
|
||||
-- is 20 000stb per day which explains the choice of value in item 4.
|
||||
-- The items > 4 are defaulted with the exception of item 9,
|
||||
-- the BHP lower limit, which is given to be 1000psia in Odeh's paper
|
||||
|
||||
WCONINJE
|
||||
-- Item #:1 2 3 4 5 6 7
|
||||
'INJ' 'GAS' 'OPEN' 'RATE' 100000 1* 9014 /
|
||||
/
|
||||
-- Stated in Odeh that gas inj. rate (item 5) is 100MMscf per day
|
||||
-- BHP upper limit (item 7) should not be exceeding the highest
|
||||
-- pressure in the PVT table=9014.7psia (default is 100 000psia)
|
||||
|
||||
TSTEP
|
||||
--Advance the simulater once a month for TEN years:
|
||||
31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31
|
||||
31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31
|
||||
31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31
|
||||
31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31
|
||||
31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31
|
||||
31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31
|
||||
31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31
|
||||
31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31
|
||||
31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31
|
||||
31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 /
|
||||
|
||||
--Advance the simulator once a year for TEN years:
|
||||
--10*365 /
|
||||
|
||||
END
|
||||
@ -3,8 +3,15 @@ import json
|
||||
import opm
|
||||
import opm.io
|
||||
import os.path
|
||||
import numpy as np
|
||||
|
||||
try:
|
||||
from tests.utils import test_path
|
||||
except ImportError:
|
||||
from utils import test_path
|
||||
|
||||
from opm.io.parser import Parser, ParseContext
|
||||
from opm.io.deck import DeckKeyword
|
||||
|
||||
class TestParse(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
|
||||
@ -83,6 +90,65 @@ FIPNUM
|
||||
self.assertIn( 'TESTKEY2', deck )
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_parser_deckItems(self):
|
||||
|
||||
parser = Parser()
|
||||
|
||||
error_recovery = [("PARSE_RANDOM_SLASH", opm.io.action.ignore),
|
||||
("PARSE_EXTRA_RECORDS", opm.io.action.ignore)]
|
||||
|
||||
context = ParseContext(error_recovery)
|
||||
|
||||
self.deck_spe1case1 = parser.parse(test_path("data/SPE1CASE1.DATA"), context)
|
||||
|
||||
dkw_compdate = self.deck_spe1case1["COMPDAT"]
|
||||
|
||||
self.assertTrue( dkw_compdate[0][0].is_string() )
|
||||
self.assertFalse( dkw_compdate[0][1].is_string() )
|
||||
|
||||
self.assertTrue( dkw_compdate[0][1].is_int() )
|
||||
self.assertFalse( dkw_compdate[0][1].is_double() )
|
||||
|
||||
self.assertTrue( dkw_compdate[0][8].is_double() )
|
||||
|
||||
self.assertTrue(dkw_compdate[0][0].value == "PROD")
|
||||
|
||||
conI = dkw_compdate[0][1].value
|
||||
conJ = dkw_compdate[0][2].value
|
||||
conK = dkw_compdate[0][3].value
|
||||
|
||||
self.assertEqual(dkw_compdate[0][5].value, "OPEN")
|
||||
|
||||
self.assertTrue((conI, conJ, conK) == (10,10,3))
|
||||
|
||||
self.assertFalse( dkw_compdate[0][7].valid )
|
||||
self.assertTrue( dkw_compdate[0][7].defaulted )
|
||||
|
||||
self.assertEqual( dkw_compdate[0][6].value, 0)
|
||||
|
||||
self.assertEqual( dkw_compdate[0][8].value, 0.5)
|
||||
|
||||
dkw_wconprod = self.deck_spe1case1["WCONPROD"]
|
||||
|
||||
welln= dkw_wconprod[0][0].value
|
||||
self.assertEqual(dkw_wconprod[0][2].value, "ORAT")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(dkw_wconprod[0][3].value, "WUOPRL")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(dkw_wconprod[0][5].value, 1.5e5)
|
||||
|
||||
dkw_permx = self.deck_spe1case1["PERMX"]
|
||||
permx = dkw_permx.get_raw_array()
|
||||
self.assertEqual(len(permx), 300)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(isinstance(permx, np.ndarray))
|
||||
self.assertEqual(permx.dtype, "float64")
|
||||
|
||||
dkw_eqlnum = self.deck_spe1case1["EQLNUM"]
|
||||
eqlnum = dkw_eqlnum.get_int_array()
|
||||
|
||||
self.assertEqual(len(eqlnum), 300)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(isinstance(eqlnum, np.ndarray))
|
||||
self.assertEqual(eqlnum.dtype, "int32")
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
if __name__ == "__main__":
|
||||
unittest.main()
|
||||
|
||||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user