changed: rename accessor to data()

the two classes EDITNNC and NNC are very similar, which makes templating
useful. this small difference makes it hard to do. unify them.
This commit is contained in:
Arne Morten Kvarving
2019-11-25 08:46:01 +01:00
parent d3cc7303b4
commit 0d6ed7cfb6
5 changed files with 7 additions and 7 deletions

View File

@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(readDeck)
EclipseState eclipseState(deck);
const auto& nnc = eclipseState.getInputNNC();
BOOST_CHECK(nnc.hasNNC());
const std::vector<NNCdata>& nncdata = nnc.nncdata();
const std::vector<NNCdata>& nncdata = nnc.data();
// test the NNCs in nnc.DATA
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(nnc.numNNC(), 4);
@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(addNNCfromDeck)
EclipseState eclipseState(deck);
auto nnc = eclipseState.getInputNNC();
BOOST_CHECK(nnc.hasNNC());
const std::vector<NNCdata>& nncdata = nnc.nncdata();
const std::vector<NNCdata>& nncdata = nnc.data();
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(nnc.numNNC(), 4);
// test add NNC
@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(addNNC)
Opm::NNC nnc;
// add NNC
nnc.addNNC(2,2,2.0);
const std::vector<NNCdata>& nncdata = nnc.nncdata();
const std::vector<NNCdata>& nncdata = nnc.data();
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(nnc.numNNC(), 1);
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(nncdata[0].cell1, 2);
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(nncdata[0].cell1, 2);