changed: rename accessor to data()
the two classes EDITNNC and NNC are very similar, which makes templating useful. this small difference makes it hard to do. unify them.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(readDeck)
|
||||
EclipseState eclipseState(deck);
|
||||
const auto& nnc = eclipseState.getInputNNC();
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(nnc.hasNNC());
|
||||
const std::vector<NNCdata>& nncdata = nnc.nncdata();
|
||||
const std::vector<NNCdata>& nncdata = nnc.data();
|
||||
|
||||
// test the NNCs in nnc.DATA
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(nnc.numNNC(), 4);
|
||||
@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(addNNCfromDeck)
|
||||
EclipseState eclipseState(deck);
|
||||
auto nnc = eclipseState.getInputNNC();
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(nnc.hasNNC());
|
||||
const std::vector<NNCdata>& nncdata = nnc.nncdata();
|
||||
const std::vector<NNCdata>& nncdata = nnc.data();
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(nnc.numNNC(), 4);
|
||||
// test add NNC
|
||||
@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(addNNC)
|
||||
Opm::NNC nnc;
|
||||
// add NNC
|
||||
nnc.addNNC(2,2,2.0);
|
||||
const std::vector<NNCdata>& nncdata = nnc.nncdata();
|
||||
const std::vector<NNCdata>& nncdata = nnc.data();
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(nnc.numNNC(), 1);
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(nncdata[0].cell1, 2);
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(nncdata[0].cell1, 2);
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user