OilfieldToolsNet/opm-common
4
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

RFT Unit Test: Use Actual 'BOOST_FAIL' Macro

Browse Source 
BOOST_TEST_FAIL was a figment of my imagination.
This commit is contained in:
Bård Skaflestad 2019-08-30 09:39:15 +02:00
parent ec250f19f8
commit 38b6451c73
1 changed files with 4 additions and 4 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

8
tests/test_RFT.cpp
View File

@ -170,8 +170,8 @@ namespace {
auto conIx = this->xConIx_.find(std::make_tuple(i, j, k));
if (conIx == this->xConIx_.end()) {
BOOST_TEST_FAIL("Invalid IJK Tuple (" << i << ", "
<< j << ", " << k << ')');
BOOST_FAIL("Invalid IJK Tuple (" << i << ", "
<< j << ", " << k << ')');
}
return conIx->second;
@ -325,7 +325,7 @@ namespace {
{
auto op_1 = dates.find("OP_1");
if (op_1 == dates.end()) {
BOOST_TEST_FAIL("Missing RFT Data for Well OP_1");
BOOST_FAIL("Missing RFT Data for Well OP_1");
}
const auto expect = std::vector<Opm::EclIO::ERft::RftDate> {
@ -341,7 +341,7 @@ namespace {
{
auto op_2 = dates.find("OP_2");
if (op_2 == dates.end()) {
BOOST_TEST_FAIL("Missing RFT Data for Well OP_2");
BOOST_FAIL("Missing RFT Data for Well OP_2");
}
const auto expect = std::vector<RftDate> {