add a thermal variant of SPE1CASE2
it currently only (hopefully) works with E300, but it should work with E100 if the THERMAL keyword is replaced by TEMP.
This commit is contained in:
Andreas Lauser
parent
bd39395fc0
commit
fc55857f61
485
spe1/SPE1CASE2_THERMAL.DATA
Normal file
485
spe1/SPE1CASE2_THERMAL.DATA
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,485 @@
|
|||||||
|
-- This reservoir simulation deck is made available under the Open Database
|
||||||
|
-- License: http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/. Any rights in
|
||||||
|
-- individual contents of the database are licensed under the Database Contents
|
||||||
|
-- License: http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/dbcl/1.0/
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
-- Copyright (C) 2015 Statoil
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
-- This simulation is based on the data given in
|
||||||
|
-- 'Comparison of Solutions to a Three-Dimensional
|
||||||
|
-- Black-Oil Reservoir Simulation Problem' by Aziz S. Odeh,
|
||||||
|
-- Journal of Petroleum Technology, January 1981
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||||
|
------------------------ SPE1 - CASE 2 ------------------------------------
|
||||||
|
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
RUNSPEC
|
||||||
|
-- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
TITLE
|
||||||
|
SPE1 - CASE 2
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
DIMENS
|
||||||
|
10 10 3 /
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
-- The number of equilibration regions is inferred from the EQLDIMS
|
||||||
|
-- keyword.
|
||||||
|
EQLDIMS
|
||||||
|
/
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
-- The number of PVTW tables is inferred from the TABDIMS keyword;
|
||||||
|
-- when no data is included in the keyword the default values are used.
|
||||||
|
TABDIMS
|
||||||
|
/
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
-- request a black-oil simulation with the thermal option (not supported by E100!)
|
||||||
|
THERMAL
|
||||||
|
-- request the temperature option instead (NOT supported by OPM!)
|
||||||
|
--TEMP
|
||||||
|
BLACKOIL
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
OIL
|
||||||
|
GAS
|
||||||
|
WATER
|
||||||
|
DISGAS
|
||||||
|
-- As seen from figure 4 in Odeh, GOR is increasing with time,
|
||||||
|
-- which means that dissolved gas is present
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
FIELD
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
START
|
||||||
|
1 'JAN' 2015 /
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
WELLDIMS
|
||||||
|
-- Item 1: maximum number of wells in the model
|
||||||
|
-- - there are two wells in the problem; injector and producer
|
||||||
|
-- Item 2: maximum number of grid blocks connected to any one well
|
||||||
|
-- - must be one as the wells are located at specific grid blocks
|
||||||
|
-- Item 3: maximum number of groups in the model
|
||||||
|
-- - we are dealing with only one 'group'
|
||||||
|
-- Item 4: maximum number of wells in any one group
|
||||||
|
-- - there must be two wells in a group as there are two wells in total
|
||||||
|
2 1 1 2 /
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
UNIFOUT
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
GRID
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
-- The INIT keyword is used to request an .INIT file. The .INIT file
|
||||||
|
-- is written before the simulation actually starts, and contains grid
|
||||||
|
-- properties and saturation tables as inferred from the input
|
||||||
|
-- deck. There are no other keywords which can be used to configure
|
||||||
|
-- exactly what is written to the .INIT file.
|
||||||
|
INIT
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
-- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||||
|
NOECHO
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
DX
|
||||||
|
-- There are in total 300 cells with length 1000ft in x-direction
|
||||||
|
300*1000 /
|
||||||
|
DY
|
||||||
|
-- There are in total 300 cells with length 1000ft in y-direction
|
||||||
|
300*1000 /
|
||||||
|
DZ
|
||||||
|
-- The layers are 20, 30 and 50 ft thick, in each layer there are 100 cells
|
||||||
|
100*20 100*30 100*50 /
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
TOPS
|
||||||
|
-- The depth of the top of each grid block
|
||||||
|
100*8325 /
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
PORO
|
||||||
|
-- Constant porosity of 0.3 throughout all 300 grid cells
|
||||||
|
300*0.3 /
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
PERMX
|
||||||
|
-- The layers have perm. 500mD, 50mD and 200mD, respectively.
|
||||||
|
100*500 100*50 100*200 /
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
PERMY
|
||||||
|
-- Equal to PERMX
|
||||||
|
100*500 100*50 100*200 /
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
PERMZ
|
||||||
|
-- Cannot find perm. in z-direction in Odeh's paper
|
||||||
|
-- For the time being, we will assume PERMZ equal to PERMX and PERMY:
|
||||||
|
100*500 100*50 100*200 /
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
-- volumetric heat capacity of rock for each cell (not supported by E100!)
|
||||||
|
-- Note: This keyword is incompatible with SPECROCK
|
||||||
|
--HEATCR
|
||||||
|
-- 300*32.0 /
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
-- temperature dependence of the volumetric heat capacity of rock for each cell (not supported by E100!)
|
||||||
|
-- Note: This keyword is incompatible with SPECROCK
|
||||||
|
--HEATCRT
|
||||||
|
-- 300*0.05 /
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
-- total thermal conductivty
|
||||||
|
THCONR
|
||||||
|
300*30.0 / -- btu/(day / ft / °F)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
-- gas saturation dependence of total thermal conductivty (not supported by E100!)
|
||||||
|
--THCONSF
|
||||||
|
-- 300*0.1 /
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
ECHO
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
PROPS
|
||||||
|
-- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
PVTW
|
||||||
|
-- Item 1: pressure reference (psia)
|
||||||
|
-- Item 2: water FVF (rb per bbl or rb per stb)
|
||||||
|
-- Item 3: water compressibility (psi^{-1})
|
||||||
|
-- Item 4: water viscosity (cp)
|
||||||
|
-- Item 5: water 'viscosibility' (psi^{-1})
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
-- Using values from Norne:
|
||||||
|
-- In METRIC units:
|
||||||
|
-- 277.0 1.038 4.67E-5 0.318 0.0 /
|
||||||
|
-- In FIELD units:
|
||||||
|
4017.55 1.038 3.22E-6 0.318 0.0 /
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
ROCK
|
||||||
|
-- Item 1: reference pressure (psia)
|
||||||
|
-- Item 2: rock compressibility (psi^{-1})
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
-- Using values from table 1 in Odeh:
|
||||||
|
14.7 3E-6 /
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
SPECHEAT
|
||||||
|
-- Column 1: Temperature [deg F]
|
||||||
|
-- Column 2: Specific heat capacity of oil [btu / (lb * degF)]
|
||||||
|
-- Column 3: Specific heat capacity of water [btu / (lb * degF)]
|
||||||
|
-- Column 4: Specific heat capacity of gas [btu / (lb * degF)]
|
||||||
|
0.0 0.5 1.0 0.25
|
||||||
|
300.0 0.5 1.0 0.25 /
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
SPECROCK
|
||||||
|
-- Column 1: Temperature [deg F]
|
||||||
|
-- Column 2: Volumetric heat capacity of rock [btu / (ft^3 * degF)]
|
||||||
|
0.0 33.
|
||||||
|
300.0 32. /
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
SWOF
|
||||||
|
-- Column 1: water saturation
|
||||||
|
-- - this has been set to (almost) equally spaced values from 0.12 to 1
|
||||||
|
-- Column 2: water relative permeability
|
||||||
|
-- - generated from the Corey-type approx. formula
|
||||||
|
-- the coeffisient is set to 10e-5, S_{orw}=0 and S_{wi}=0.12
|
||||||
|
-- Column 3: oil relative permeability when only oil and water are present
|
||||||
|
-- - we will use the same values as in column 3 in SGOF.
|
||||||
|
-- This is not really correct, but since only the first
|
||||||
|
-- two values are of importance, this does not really matter
|
||||||
|
-- Column 4: corresponding water-oil capillary pressure (psi)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
0.12 0 1 0
|
||||||
|
0.18 4.64876033057851E-008 1 0
|
||||||
|
0.24 0.000000186 0.997 0
|
||||||
|
0.3 4.18388429752066E-007 0.98 0
|
||||||
|
0.36 7.43801652892562E-007 0.7 0
|
||||||
|
0.42 1.16219008264463E-006 0.35 0
|
||||||
|
0.48 1.67355371900826E-006 0.2 0
|
||||||
|
0.54 2.27789256198347E-006 0.09 0
|
||||||
|
0.6 2.97520661157025E-006 0.021 0
|
||||||
|
0.66 3.7654958677686E-006 0.01 0
|
||||||
|
0.72 4.64876033057851E-006 0.001 0
|
||||||
|
0.78 0.000005625 0.0001 0
|
||||||
|
0.84 6.69421487603306E-006 0 0
|
||||||
|
0.91 8.05914256198347E-006 0 0
|
||||||
|
1 0.00001 0 0 /
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
SGOF
|
||||||
|
-- Column 1: gas saturation
|
||||||
|
-- Column 2: gas relative permeability
|
||||||
|
-- Column 3: oil relative permeability when oil, gas and connate water are present
|
||||||
|
-- Column 4: oil-gas capillary pressure (psi)
|
||||||
|
-- - stated to be zero in Odeh's paper
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
-- Values in column 1-3 are taken from table 3 in Odeh's paper:
|
||||||
|
0 0 1 0
|
||||||
|
0.001 0 1 0
|
||||||
|
0.02 0 0.997 0
|
||||||
|
0.05 0.005 0.980 0
|
||||||
|
0.12 0.025 0.700 0
|
||||||
|
0.2 0.075 0.350 0
|
||||||
|
0.25 0.125 0.200 0
|
||||||
|
0.3 0.190 0.090 0
|
||||||
|
0.4 0.410 0.021 0
|
||||||
|
0.45 0.60 0.010 0
|
||||||
|
0.5 0.72 0.001 0
|
||||||
|
0.6 0.87 0.0001 0
|
||||||
|
0.7 0.94 0.000 0
|
||||||
|
0.85 0.98 0.000 0
|
||||||
|
0.88 0.984 0.000 0 /
|
||||||
|
--1.00 1.0 0.000 0 /
|
||||||
|
-- Warning from Eclipse: first sat. value in SWOF + last sat. value in SGOF
|
||||||
|
-- must not be greater than 1, but Eclipse still runs
|
||||||
|
-- Flow needs the sum to be excactly 1 so I added a row with gas sat. = 0.88
|
||||||
|
-- The corresponding krg value was estimated by assuming linear rel. between
|
||||||
|
-- gas sat. and krw. between gas sat. 0.85 and 1.00 (the last two values given)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
DENSITY
|
||||||
|
-- Density (lb per ft³) at surface cond. of
|
||||||
|
-- oil, water and gas, respectively (in that order)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
-- Using values from Norne:
|
||||||
|
-- In METRIC units:
|
||||||
|
-- 859.5 1033.0 0.854 /
|
||||||
|
-- In FIELD units:
|
||||||
|
53.66 64.49 0.0533 /
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
PVDG
|
||||||
|
-- Column 1: gas phase pressure (psia)
|
||||||
|
-- Column 2: gas formation volume factor (rb per Mscf)
|
||||||
|
-- - in Odeh's paper the units are said to be given in rb per bbl,
|
||||||
|
-- but this is assumed to be a mistake: FVF-values in Odeh's paper
|
||||||
|
-- are given in rb per scf, not rb per bbl. This will be in
|
||||||
|
-- agreement with conventions
|
||||||
|
-- Column 3: gas viscosity (cP)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
-- Using values from lower right table in Odeh's table 2:
|
||||||
|
14.700 166.666 0.008000
|
||||||
|
264.70 12.0930 0.009600
|
||||||
|
514.70 6.27400 0.011200
|
||||||
|
1014.7 3.19700 0.014000
|
||||||
|
2014.7 1.61400 0.018900
|
||||||
|
2514.7 1.29400 0.020800
|
||||||
|
3014.7 1.08000 0.022800
|
||||||
|
4014.7 0.81100 0.026800
|
||||||
|
5014.7 0.64900 0.030900
|
||||||
|
9014.7 0.38600 0.047000 /
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
PVTO
|
||||||
|
-- Column 1: dissolved gas-oil ratio (Mscf per stb)
|
||||||
|
-- Column 2: bubble point pressure (psia)
|
||||||
|
-- Column 3: oil FVF for saturated oil (rb per stb)
|
||||||
|
-- Column 4: oil viscosity for saturated oil (cP)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
-- Use values from top left table in Odeh's table 2:
|
||||||
|
0.0010 14.7 1.0620 1.0400 /
|
||||||
|
0.0905 264.7 1.1500 0.9750 /
|
||||||
|
0.1800 514.7 1.2070 0.9100 /
|
||||||
|
0.3710 1014.7 1.2950 0.8300 /
|
||||||
|
0.6360 2014.7 1.4350 0.6950 /
|
||||||
|
0.7750 2514.7 1.5000 0.6410 /
|
||||||
|
0.9300 3014.7 1.5650 0.5940 /
|
||||||
|
1.2700 4014.7 1.6950 0.5100
|
||||||
|
9014.7 1.5790 0.7400 /
|
||||||
|
1.6180 5014.7 1.8270 0.4490
|
||||||
|
9014.7 1.7370 0.6310 /
|
||||||
|
-- It is required to enter data for undersaturated oil for the highest GOR
|
||||||
|
-- (i.e. the last row) in the PVTO table.
|
||||||
|
-- In order to fulfill this requirement, values for oil FVF and viscosity
|
||||||
|
-- at 9014.7psia and GOR=1.618 for undersaturated oil have been approximated:
|
||||||
|
-- It has been assumed that there is a linear relation between the GOR
|
||||||
|
-- and the FVF when keeping the pressure constant at 9014.7psia.
|
||||||
|
-- From Odeh we know that (at 9014.7psia) the FVF is 2.357 at GOR=2.984
|
||||||
|
-- for saturated oil and that the FVF is 1.579 at GOR=1.27 for undersaturated oil,
|
||||||
|
-- so it is possible to use the assumption described above.
|
||||||
|
-- An equivalent approximation for the viscosity has been used.
|
||||||
|
/
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
SOLUTION
|
||||||
|
-- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
EQUIL
|
||||||
|
-- Item 1: datum depth (ft)
|
||||||
|
-- Item 2: pressure at datum depth (psia)
|
||||||
|
-- - Odeh's table 1 says that initial reservoir pressure is
|
||||||
|
-- 4800 psi at 8400ft, which explains choice of item 1 and 2
|
||||||
|
-- Item 3: depth of water-oil contact (ft)
|
||||||
|
-- - chosen to be directly under the reservoir
|
||||||
|
-- Item 4: oil-water capillary pressure at the water oil contact (psi)
|
||||||
|
-- - given to be 0 in Odeh's paper
|
||||||
|
-- Item 5: depth of gas-oil contact (ft)
|
||||||
|
-- - chosen to be directly above the reservoir
|
||||||
|
-- Item 6: gas-oil capillary pressure at gas-oil contact (psi)
|
||||||
|
-- - given to be 0 in Odeh's paper
|
||||||
|
-- Item 7: RSVD-table
|
||||||
|
-- Item 8: RVVD-table
|
||||||
|
-- Item 9: Set to 0 as this is the only value supported by OPM
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
-- Item #: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
|
||||||
|
8400 4800 8450 0 8300 0 1 0 0 /
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
RSVD
|
||||||
|
-- Dissolved GOR is initially constant with depth through the reservoir.
|
||||||
|
-- The reason is that the initial reservoir pressure given is higher
|
||||||
|
---than the bubble point presssure of 4014.7psia, meaning that there is no
|
||||||
|
-- free gas initially present.
|
||||||
|
8300 1.270
|
||||||
|
8450 1.270 /
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
-- initial reservoir temperature (°F)
|
||||||
|
RTEMPVD
|
||||||
|
8300 150
|
||||||
|
8450 200 /
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
SUMMARY
|
||||||
|
-- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
-- 1a) Oil rate vs time
|
||||||
|
FOPR
|
||||||
|
-- Field Oil Production Rate
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
-- 1b) GOR vs time
|
||||||
|
WGOR
|
||||||
|
-- Well Gas-Oil Ratio
|
||||||
|
'PROD'
|
||||||
|
/
|
||||||
|
-- Using FGOR instead of WGOR:PROD results in the same graph
|
||||||
|
FGOR
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
-- 2a) Pressures of the cell where the injector and producer are located
|
||||||
|
BPR
|
||||||
|
1 1 1 /
|
||||||
|
10 10 3 /
|
||||||
|
/
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
-- 2b) Gas saturation at grid points given in Odeh's paper
|
||||||
|
BGSAT
|
||||||
|
1 1 1 /
|
||||||
|
1 1 2 /
|
||||||
|
1 1 3 /
|
||||||
|
10 1 1 /
|
||||||
|
10 1 2 /
|
||||||
|
10 1 3 /
|
||||||
|
10 10 1 /
|
||||||
|
10 10 2 /
|
||||||
|
10 10 3 /
|
||||||
|
/
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
-- In order to compare Eclipse with Flow:
|
||||||
|
WBHP
|
||||||
|
'INJ'
|
||||||
|
'PROD'
|
||||||
|
/
|
||||||
|
WGIR
|
||||||
|
'INJ'
|
||||||
|
'PROD'
|
||||||
|
/
|
||||||
|
WGIT
|
||||||
|
'INJ'
|
||||||
|
'PROD'
|
||||||
|
/
|
||||||
|
WGPR
|
||||||
|
'INJ'
|
||||||
|
'PROD'
|
||||||
|
/
|
||||||
|
WGPT
|
||||||
|
'INJ'
|
||||||
|
'PROD'
|
||||||
|
/
|
||||||
|
WOIR
|
||||||
|
'INJ'
|
||||||
|
'PROD'
|
||||||
|
/
|
||||||
|
WOIT
|
||||||
|
'INJ'
|
||||||
|
'PROD'
|
||||||
|
/
|
||||||
|
WOPR
|
||||||
|
'INJ'
|
||||||
|
'PROD'
|
||||||
|
/
|
||||||
|
WOPT
|
||||||
|
'INJ'
|
||||||
|
'PROD'
|
||||||
|
/
|
||||||
|
WWIR
|
||||||
|
'INJ'
|
||||||
|
'PROD'
|
||||||
|
/
|
||||||
|
WWIT
|
||||||
|
'INJ'
|
||||||
|
'PROD'
|
||||||
|
/
|
||||||
|
WWPR
|
||||||
|
'INJ'
|
||||||
|
'PROD'
|
||||||
|
/
|
||||||
|
WWPT
|
||||||
|
'INJ'
|
||||||
|
'PROD'
|
||||||
|
/
|
||||||
|
SCHEDULE
|
||||||
|
-- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||||
|
RPTSCHED
|
||||||
|
'PRES' 'SGAS' 'RS' 'WELLS' /
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
RPTRST
|
||||||
|
'BASIC=1' /
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
-- If no resolution (i.e. case 1), the two following lines must be added:
|
||||||
|
--DRSDT
|
||||||
|
-- 0 /
|
||||||
|
-- Since this is Case 2, the two lines above have been commented out.
|
||||||
|
-- if DRSDT is set to 0, GOR cannot rise and free gas does not
|
||||||
|
-- dissolve in undersaturated oil -> constant bubble point pressure
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
WELSPECS
|
||||||
|
-- Item #: 1 2 3 4 5 6
|
||||||
|
'PROD' 'G1' 10 10 8400 'OIL' /
|
||||||
|
'INJ' 'G1' 1 1 8335 'GAS' /
|
||||||
|
/
|
||||||
|
-- Coordinates in item 3-4 are retrieved from Odeh's figure 1 and 2
|
||||||
|
-- Note that the depth at the midpoint of the well grid blocks
|
||||||
|
-- has been used as reference depth for bottom hole pressure in item 5
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
COMPDAT
|
||||||
|
-- Item #: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
|
||||||
|
'PROD' 10 10 3 3 'OPEN' 1* 1* 0.5 /
|
||||||
|
'INJ' 1 1 1 1 'OPEN' 1* 1* 0.5 /
|
||||||
|
/
|
||||||
|
-- Coordinates in item 2-5 are retreived from Odeh's figure 1 and 2
|
||||||
|
-- Item 9 is the well bore internal diameter,
|
||||||
|
-- the radius is given to be 0.25ft in Odeh's paper
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
WCONPROD
|
||||||
|
-- Item #:1 2 3 4 5 9
|
||||||
|
'PROD' 'OPEN' 'ORAT' 20000 4* 1000 /
|
||||||
|
/
|
||||||
|
-- It is stated in Odeh's paper that the maximum oil prod. rate
|
||||||
|
-- is 20 000stb per day which explains the choice of value in item 4.
|
||||||
|
-- The items > 4 are defaulted with the exception of item 9,
|
||||||
|
-- the BHP lower limit, which is given to be 1000psia in Odeh's paper
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
WCONINJE
|
||||||
|
-- Item #:1 2 3 4 5 6 7
|
||||||
|
'INJ' 'GAS' 'OPEN' 'RATE' 100000 1* 9014 /
|
||||||
|
/
|
||||||
|
-- Stated in Odeh that gas inj. rate (item 5) is 100MMscf per day
|
||||||
|
-- BHP upper limit (item 7) should not be exceeding the highest
|
||||||
|
-- pressure in the PVT table=9014.7psia (default is 100 000psia)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
-- well injection temperature
|
||||||
|
WTEMP
|
||||||
|
'INJ' 200 /
|
||||||
|
-- 'PROD' 60 /
|
||||||
|
/
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
TSTEP
|
||||||
|
--Advance the simulater once a month for TEN years:
|
||||||
|
31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31
|
||||||
|
31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31
|
||||||
|
31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31
|
||||||
|
31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31
|
||||||
|
31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31
|
||||||
|
31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31
|
||||||
|
31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31
|
||||||
|
31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31
|
||||||
|
31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31
|
||||||
|
31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 /
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
--Advance the simulator once a year for TEN years:
|
||||||
|
--10*365 /
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
END
|
||||||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user