mirror of
https://github.com/OPM/opm-simulators.git
synced 2024-11-28 20:13:49 -06:00
more careful determination of the most restrictive bhp value
when computing the well potentials
This commit is contained in:
parent
d4ce1eddc9
commit
18a75dcabc
@ -1664,22 +1664,68 @@ namespace Opm {
|
||||
|
||||
for (int w = 0; w < nw; ++w) {
|
||||
// bhp needs to be determined for the well potential calculation
|
||||
double bhp = 0.;
|
||||
|
||||
// default bhp constraints
|
||||
const WellType& well_type = wells().type[w];
|
||||
double bhp = 0.;
|
||||
switch(well_type) {
|
||||
case INJECTOR:
|
||||
bhp = 6.895e8; // defaulted high limit
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case PRODUCER:
|
||||
bhp = 1.013e5; // defaulted low limit
|
||||
break;
|
||||
default:
|
||||
OPM_THROW(std::logic_error, "Expected PRODUCER or INJECTOR type for well " << wells().name[w]);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// the well controls
|
||||
const WellControls* well_control = wells().ctrls[w];
|
||||
// The number of the well controls
|
||||
const int nwc = well_controls_get_num(well_control);
|
||||
|
||||
// Finding a BHP control or a THP control
|
||||
// Finding BHP control or THP controls, not sure whether there can be more than one BHP controls, THP can be more than one
|
||||
// IF we find a THP control, we calculate the BHP value.
|
||||
// TODO: there is option to ignore the THP limit when calculating well potentials,
|
||||
// we are not handling it for the moment.
|
||||
|
||||
// getting the bhp constraints from the well control
|
||||
double bhp_from_wellcontrol = -1.e5; // intial nagative value, assumming we can not specify negative BHP constraints
|
||||
for (int ctrl_index = 0; ctrl_index < nwc; ++ctrl_index) {
|
||||
if (well_controls_iget_type(well_control, ctrl_index) == BHP) {
|
||||
// set bhp to the bhp value
|
||||
bhp = well_controls_iget_target(well_control, ctrl_index);
|
||||
}
|
||||
// get the bhp constraint value, it should always be postive assummingly
|
||||
const double bhp_target = well_controls_iget_target(well_control, ctrl_index);
|
||||
|
||||
// assuming we can not specify negative bhp constraints
|
||||
assert(bhp_target > 0.);
|
||||
|
||||
if (bhp_from_wellcontrol < 0.) {
|
||||
bhp_from_wellcontrol = bhp_target; // first time finding a bhp constraint
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
switch(well_type) {
|
||||
case INJECTOR: // using the lower bhp contraint from Injectors
|
||||
if (bhp_target < bhp_from_wellcontrol) {
|
||||
bhp_from_wellcontrol = bhp_target;
|
||||
}
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case PRODUCER:
|
||||
if (bhp_target > bhp_from_wellcontrol) {
|
||||
bhp_from_wellcontrol = bhp_target;
|
||||
}
|
||||
break;
|
||||
default:
|
||||
OPM_THROW(std::logic_error, "Expected PRODUCER or INJECTOR type for well " << wells().name[w]);
|
||||
} // end of switch
|
||||
} // end of else
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (bhp_from_wellcontrol > 0.) { // finding at least one bhp constaint
|
||||
bhp = bhp_from_wellcontrol;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// checking for bhp contraints resulting from thp constraints
|
||||
for (int ctrl_index = 0; ctrl_index < nwc; ++ctrl_index) {
|
||||
if (well_controls_iget_type(well_control, ctrl_index) == THP) {
|
||||
double aqua = 0.0;
|
||||
double liquid = 0.0;
|
||||
@ -1730,8 +1776,6 @@ namespace Opm {
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
assert(bhp != 0.0);
|
||||
|
||||
// Should we consider crossflow when calculating well potentionals?
|
||||
const bool allow_cf = allow_cross_flow(w, ebosSimulator);
|
||||
for (int perf = wells().well_connpos[w]; perf < wells().well_connpos[w+1]; ++perf) {
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user