mirror of
https://github.com/OPM/opm-simulators.git
synced 2024-11-28 20:13:49 -06:00
removing a few blank lines.
and adding a assertion that bhp != 0 when calculating well potentials.
This commit is contained in:
parent
9e93ebcc64
commit
31e7dec018
@ -1197,7 +1197,6 @@ enum WellVariablePositions {
|
||||
well_controls_set_current( wc, current);
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
// Updating well state and primary variables if constraint is broken
|
||||
|
||||
// Target values are used as initial conditions for BHP, THP, and SURFACE_RATE
|
||||
@ -1294,13 +1293,10 @@ enum WellVariablePositions {
|
||||
OPM_THROW(std::logic_error, "Expected PRODUCER or INJECTOR type of well");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
std::vector<double> g = {1,1,0.01};
|
||||
if (well_controls_iget_type(wc, current) == RESERVOIR_RATE) {
|
||||
for (int phase = 0; phase < np; ++phase) {
|
||||
@ -1598,6 +1594,8 @@ enum WellVariablePositions {
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
assert(bhp != 0.0);
|
||||
|
||||
// Should we consider crossflow when calculating well potentionals?
|
||||
const bool allow_cf = allow_cross_flow(w, ebosSimulator);
|
||||
for (int perf = wells().well_connpos[w]; perf < wells().well_connpos[w+1]; ++perf) {
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user