OilfieldToolsNet/opm-simulators
4
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/OPM/opm-simulators.git synced 2025-02-25 18:55:30 -06:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

cleaning up and adding more comments for better understanding.

Browse Source 
No functional change.
This commit is contained in:
Kai Bao
2016-11-02 13:53:30 +01:00
parent 8ce422072e
commit 62dbf74bc9
3 changed files with 24 additions and 30 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

27
opm/core/wells/WellsGroup.cpp
View File

@@ -538,23 +538,14 @@ namespace Opm
InjectionSpecification::InjectorType inj_type = injSpec().injector_type_;
switch (inj_mode) {
case InjectionSpecification::RATE:
// need to be careful in the future.
// pay attention to the phase under control and the phase for the guide rate
// they can be different, and more delicate situatioin can happen here.
case InjectionSpecification::RESV:
{
// very hacky way here.
// The logic of the code is that only a well is specified under GRUP control, it is under group control.
// Which is not the case observed from the result.
// From the result, if we specify group control with GCONPROD and WCONPROD for a well, it looks like
// the well will be under group control.
// TODO: make the logic correct here instead of using `false here`.
// all the wells will be assinged a group control target.
// TODO: when we consider WGRUPCON and well groups not responding to higher level group control
const double my_guide_rate = injectionGuideRate(false);
for (size_t i = 0; i < children_.size(); ++i) {
// Apply for all children.
// Note, we do _not_ want to call the applyProdGroupControl in this object,
// as that would check if we're under group control, something we're not.
// Apply group control to all children.
const double children_guide_rate = children_[i]->injectionGuideRate(false);
children_[i]->applyInjGroupControl(inj_mode, inj_type,
(children_guide_rate / my_guide_rate) * getTarget(inj_mode) / efficiencyFactor(),
@@ -563,18 +554,6 @@ namespace Opm
return;
}
case InjectionSpecification::VREP:
{
// really not sure whether to give a initialized target will be a good idea. It can cause the initial guess too far
// from the reasonable result and numerical convergence failure.
// Let us try to see what will happen. We begin with 100 / day, which is about 0.001.
// const double my_guide_rate = injectionGuideRate(false);
/* for (size_t i = 0; i < children_.size(); ++i) {
const double children_guide_rate = children_[i] -> injectionGuideRate(false);
children_[i]->applyInjGroupControl(, inj_type,
(children_guide_rate / my_guide_rate) * target / efficiencyFactor(), true);
} */
}
case InjectionSpecification::REIN:
std::cout << "Replacement keywords found, remember to call applyExplicitReinjectionControls." << std::endl;
return;