OilfieldToolsNet/opm-simulators
4
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/OPM/opm-simulators.git synced 2024-12-30 11:06:55 -06:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

fixing a few of bugs.

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Kai Bao 2017-09-29 16:40:39 +02:00
parent 4c207eb1f5
commit 8c3f45f58e
1 changed files with 7 additions and 4 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

11
opm/autodiff/MultisegmentWell_impl.hpp
View File

@ -70,6 +70,7 @@ namespace Opm
}
// callcuate the depth difference between perforations and their segments
perf_depth_.resize(number_of_perforations_, 0.);
for (int seg = 0; seg < numberOfSegments(); ++seg) {
const double segment_depth = segmentSet()[seg].depth();
for (const int perf : segment_perforations_[seg]) {
@ -333,7 +334,9 @@ namespace Opm
}
}
}
// should save the perforation pressure and perforation rates?
// TODO: we should save the perforation pressure and preforation rates?
// we do not use it in the simulation for now, while we might need them if
// we handle the pressure in SEG mode.
}
// the fourth dequation, the pressure drop equation
@ -1668,7 +1671,7 @@ namespace Opm
// calcuate the maximum cross-area among the segment and its inlet segments
double max_area = area;
for (const int inlet : segment_inlets_[seg]) {
const double inlet_area = segmentSet()[seg].crossArea();
const double inlet_area = segmentSet()[inlet].crossArea();
if (inlet_area > max_area) {
max_area = inlet_area;
}
@ -1861,7 +1864,7 @@ namespace Opm
frictionalPressureLossConsidered() const
{
// HF- and HFA needs to consider frictional pressure loss
return (SegmentSet().compPressureDrop() != WellSegment::H__);
return (segmentSet().compPressureDrop() != WellSegment::H__);
}
@ -1873,7 +1876,7 @@ namespace Opm
MultisegmentWell<TypeTag>::
accelerationalPressureLossConsidered() const
{
return (SegmentSet().compPressureDrop() == WellSegment::HFA);
return (segmentSet().compPressureDrop() == WellSegment::HFA);
}
}