Have removed the SimulatorState base class, and instead replaced with
the SimulationDatacontainer class from opm-common. The SimulatorState
objects were typcially created with a default constructor, and then
explicitly initialized with a SimulatorState::init() method. For the
SimulationDataContainer RAII is employed; the init( ) has been removed -
and there is no default constructor.
- The initial rates are only set to target values for single phase
producers (orat, wrat, grat).
- For injectors compi is used to determine the initial target rates.
The relative permeabilty endpoints are scaled by the miscibility
function. The endpoints is not supposed to be negative therefore all
negative values are replaced by zero.
the typo was caused the surface density of the oil phase to be used
instead of the one of gas. This caused the density to be off by a
factor of typically about 900.
using saturated FVFs does not change much, but it does not hurt
because it is also done that way in the simulator.
This makes the defaults for the threshold pressures reasonable again,
but for some reason they are not exactly the same as in the old
implementation. (although the differences are very tolerable.)
On the question why only "Model 2" is affected by this: the other
decks don't use threshold pressures (SPE-X) or do not default any
values (Norne).
A power method where both f and g are ADB variables is added
using the general derivative rule
(f^g)' = f^g * ln(f) * g' + g * f^(g-1) * f'
Tests are added to test_block.cpp
the opm-material classes are the ones which are now used by
opm-autodiff and this patch makes it much easier to keep the opm-core
and opm-autodiff results consistent. Also, the opm-material classes
seem to be a bit faster than the opm-core ones (see
https://github.com/OPM/opm-autodiff/pull/576)
I ran the usual array of tests with `flow`: SPE1, SPE3, SPE9 and Norne
all produce the same results at the identical runtime (modulo noise)
and also "Model 2" seems to work.
- The PolymerState class will derive from SimulatorState, instead of
containing a TwoPhaseState instance.
- The Polymer calculation methods take PolymerState& input argument
instead of TwoPhaseState&
