it is for WellCollection, which is logically wrong. It should be done in
the group level, while things will be different for multi-level groups.
The current implementation basically works for current needs, that we
only have one group.
forced and only_group basically mean two opposite things. Having both of
them in the same context will be really confusing and error-prone.
And also, we do not do anything forcedly. We do things base on what
setup tells us to do.
Only_group may not be the final name, while deinitely a better one than
forced.
For the WellModel from the simulator to use. Not decided totally,
well_collection might need to be updated during the simualtion due
to the update the target of wells.
Current understanding. Two ways might prevent to return the guide_rate here
1. preventing the well from group control with keyword WGRUPCON
2. the well violating some limits and working under limits. We do not have strategy
to handle this situation yet.
Very hacky way here. The logic of the code is that only
a well is specified under GRUP control, it is under group
control. Which is not the case observed from the result.
From the result, if we specify group control with GCONPROD
and WCONPROD for a well, it looks like the well will be
under group control. TODO: make the logic correct here
instead of using `false` here.
opm-output's data::Wells interface changed to no longer just accept a
dump of opm-core's WellState object. Update WellState to restore itself
from this new interface rather than reading the dumped vectors as-is.
since the unit code within opm-parser is now a drop-in replacement,
this simplifies things and make them less error-prone.
unfortunately, this requires quite a few PRs. (most are pretty
trivial, though.)
- api changes in newer versions
- do not manually destroy the preconditioner. this is, and has always
been, owned by the ksp object and dies with its destruction.
the purpose of this is to get a more defined behaviour when doing the
gravity correction/upstream cell determination in the flux term.
I consider this to be just a kludge, so if anyone has a better idea of
what the composition for the non-existing gas and oil phases is,
please tell me. (note that generic compositional models do not exhibit
this issue because the composition of all fluids is always fully
defined because each component is assumed to dissolve in every phase.)
