The 'cpty' field is for internal memory management purposes only.
No client can know of its existence, let alone inspect or directly
change the value, so it should not be used to adjudicate control set
equality. This was useful during the refactoring work to introduce
the opm-parser support, but its utility has since ceased.
Okay'ed by: [at] atgeirr and [at] joakim-hove
Current version executes reordered solve once for each tracer. The benefit
is a simpler code and the ability to use MDU with tracers. The cost is
potentially higher runtime, compared to doing a single sweep for all
tracers (and tof).
When this boolean parameter is true (the default), tracer solutions
will be normalized so that the tracer averages will sum to one in each cell.
This behaviour is the same as before, the change is that it can now be
turned off.
this basically means using Opm::EclipseState instead of the raw deck
for these keywords.
with this, property modifiers like ADD, MULT, COPY and friends are
supported for at least the PERM* keywords. If additional keywords are
required these can be added relatively easily as well.
no ctest regressions have been observed with this patch on my machine.
The queried keywords are unknown to the parser and after manual
inspection also to the Eclipse RM. There might be wrong keywords some
left, but these were to ones needed to get SPE9 started using
sim_fibo_ad...
the largest change is that all classes below opm/core/props/pvt take
the PVT region index as an argument, the higher-level ones (i.e.,
BlackoilProps*) take cell indices.
Previous fix was wrong because it called getKeyword() outside the
hasKeyword() check. Current version (like original code) uses the
short-circuiting behaviour of && to ensure this.
This was missing in commit 4c2120c and produced some build failures
that were hard to analyse. I'm not convinced that the underlying
problem is solved, but this does at least restore the build.
The class OwnerOverlapCopyCommunication is not defined unless MPI is
avilable. Therefore, we cannot reference the type unless we know
that MPI is available in the current translation unit.
