i.e., the EclProblem does no longer need to implement the
`timeIntegration()` method itself. since `flow` does not use this code
path, it is unaffected.
this value is was chosen to exactly replicate `flow`'s behavior. IMO,
it would be less surprising to set the default to `1`, i.e., the user
needs to specify `--threads-per-process=$N` explicitly if
multithreaded linearization ought to be used.
`mebos` works similarly as `flow`, but in contrast to `flow`, `mebos`
only creates the deck in the common code path whilst the
'EclipseState' and the other higher-level parser objects are always
created internally by the vanguard. this approach avoids code
duplication and the worst effects of parser API creep.
to avoid having to compile non-trivial compile units multiple times,
the actual code of the variants is moved into `ebos_$VARIANT.{hh,cc}`
files and the respective compile units are each put into a small
static library whilst the main function of said libraries are invoked
by either the multiplexed or the respective specialized simulator's
`main()`. This is also somewhat similar of how `flow` works, with the
difference that `mebos` uses the blackoil variant to determine the
parameters it needs to know for parsing the deck instead of
introducing a "fake" type tag for this. The rationale is to reduce
compile time compared to the "fake type tag" approach and -- to a
lesser extend -- avoid unnecessary copy-and-pasting of code. In
particular, this means that for the vast majority of cases, only one
place needs changed in the code for all `ebos` variants if, for
example, the parser API requires further objects in the future.
this makes slightly incorrect decks usable with `ebos`. since the
common `flow` variants use a different code path to parse the deck,
they are unaffected. (as far as I can see, the only variant which
might be affected is `flow_ebos_oilwater_polymer_injectivity` and even
for it `flow`'s multiplexing code will abort the run before the
vanguard is even called.)
The intend is to make the purpose of `ebos` clearer: while it can be
used in production, the stability guarantees are somewhat lower than
for `flow` and testing is a bit less rigorous (most of the time).
In the case where two were direct vertical neighbors in the grid
but not in the underlying cartesian grid (e.g. because of MINPV or
pinch outs), we treated them as NNCs and wrote the transmissibilty
to TRANNC.
With this patch we detect this situation (two neighbor cells with identical
i and i and no active cells between them) and do not create an NNC
in the eclipse output files but write the transmissibility to TRANZ.
