- use imported target for linking
- use separate damaris cmake script
- handle HAVE_DAMARIS config variable in the usual way
fixing issues when user does not provide an outputDir via a command_line
avoid adding damaris's command lines when we dont have damaris
This is necessary because when using Damaris we must have the output dir ready
when we initialize Damaris. In the existing code, this was ensured only
from the setupLogging() call.
Damaris initialization is added after InitMpi but before starting the simulation. Damaris will invoke a separate core for writing in
parallel and leave the rest of cores for the simulator. The main changes are in main where start_damaris and then in eclwriterm where
we use damaris to output the PRESSURE. To test Damaris one can use --enable-damaris-output=true and to use parallel HDF5 one can use
--enable-async-damaris-output=true (false is the default choice)
This is only instantiated for two-phase gas/oil and for 3-phase blackoil.
Runtime safeguards have been added to avoid the mistake of running with
a simulator combination that silently ignores DIFFUSE.
this is used transferring ownership of setup structures to the
simulator. drop all the flowEbosXXX set deck methods and use the
generic vanguard. also means various structs that were only passed
in the blackoil simulator are now passed in all simulators.
Adding explicit input specification of water-gas ratio (RVW) and RVW output plus simulator gas-water system with salt precipitation and water evaporation for
If no cell has a valid corner-point geometry, typically caused by
using GDFILE to read non-finite data such as all ZCORN = -1.0E+20,
then we must not attempt to generate a grid structure. If we do, we
will typically just fail somewhere deep down in the corner-point
processing code and generate a diagnostic message that's hard to
decipher.
With this commit we instead output a diagnostic message of the form
Failed to create valid EclipseState object.
Exception caught: No active cell in input grid has valid/finite cell geometry
Please check geometry keywords, especially if grid is imported through GDFILE
This may not be a lot better than the original diagnostic
Processing grid
flow: ${ROOT}/opm-grid/opm/grid/cpgpreprocess/preprocess.c:768: is_lefthanded: Assertion `! searching' failed.
Aborted (core dumped)
but does at least suggest that the grid data may be faulty.
There was a fallout when skipping concating these files to the
default ones (PR #1708). We should also have deactivated creating
these files at all. As a result these files appeared in all parallel
runs that were aborted.
This change now prevents creating and logging to these files in
parallel in a default
run (--enable-parallel-logging-fallout-warning=false).
Developers can still activate logging and concating to see whether
everything is only logged on the io process by passing
--enable-parallel-logging-fallout-warning=true.
Closes 3725
This allows for testing the simulator with the artifically split communicator,
in order to verify that there is no inappropriate usage of the world communicator.
This commit moves the bodies of the various 'dynamicDispatch_<>()'
cases out to separate helper functions. Not only does this reduce
the number of nested conditionals, it also helps reasoning about
each case in isolation and aids future maintenance.
Expect non-reference type shared pointers arguments instead of references
to shared pointer. This will make it clear to the caller that the called
function is making a copy of the pointer for its own use and not trying
to modify the original pointer of the caller.
Adds a new constructor to Main.hpp that takes shared pointers to Deck,
EclipseState, Schedule, and SummaryConfig. This makes it possible to
share these variables with Python without worrying about lifetime issues
of the underlying C++ objects. For example, a Python script can first
create an opm.io.schedule.Schedule object which is modified from Python.
Then, assume the same Python script creates an
opm.simulators.BlackOilSimulator which is initialized with the same
schedule object. Since the underlying C++ object is a shared pointer,
the Schedule object in Python may go out of scope (get deleted by Python)
without having the C++ schedule object being deleted. And the Python
BlackOilSimulator may continue to be used after the Python Schedule object
has been deleted since it still has a valid C++ schedule object.
