With GCC version (Debian 4.9.2-10) 4.9.2 we get the following error
when compiling with -std=c++11 (default for dune 2.4):
converting to ‘const std::unordered_set<std::basic_string<char> >’ from initializer list would use explicit constructor
Instead of the WellsManager guessing which wells are handled by other
processes we now use tha ouput of the load balancer to compute wells
that are handled by other processes.
With the previous approach it was not possible to calculate this information
correctly. Wells with only one completion next to the border of the
processes' partition were represented on multiple processes. In additition
wells that the eclipse schedule section defined with completions on non-active
cells in sequential runs were not at all calculated in parallel runs.
With the new approach the CpGrid::loaBalance routine returns the set names of
wells that are not handled by this process when setting up the simulation. This
information is then used throughout the simulation.
Check that we actually have data values for relative permeability
properties {WAT,OIL,GAS}KR before attempting to output the arrays.
While here, also correct an apparent misprint in the criterion for
whether or not to activate relperm output. We should check
'liquid_active' and 'vapour_active', not 'aqua_active', when
considering OILKR and GASKR properties respectively.
this simplifies handling the pore volume by centralising the code,
i.e., moving it into opm-parser. (in particular, it makes the MINPV
handling consistent with the active cells which get removed by the
grid.) If eclipse turns out to be inconsistent here, we need to deal
with atrocities like the MULTREGP keyword on a case-by-case basis,
i.e., it would considerably uglify the code and be an additional
maintainance burden.
note that besides supporting of MULTREGP, the code should now also
handle explicitly setting the pore volume via the PORV keyword
correctly....
When running in parallel a well state object with the well information
of the whole grid needs to constructed to gather the information from all
processes. Previously, this was done with the report step exported by the
timer. This was wrong for the following reason:
The output occurs after solving the time step and the timer is already
incremented. This means that we constructed the well state for gathering the
data for the next report step, already. Unfortunately, at that step some
wells that we have computed results for might have been shut. In that case
an exception with message "global state does not contain well ..." was thrown.
This problem occured for Model number 2 and might have been due to shut wells
because of banned cross flow.
With this commit we use the last report step if this is not an initial write
and not a substep.
