mirror of
https://github.com/OPM/opm-simulators.git
synced 2025-01-04 13:36:57 -06:00
c379823dec
I tested #1712 without deriving the `EclFlowProblem` type tag from `FlowIstlSolver`, and it worked because the linear solver was still `Opm::ISTLSolverEbos` because the linear solver is set via the `LinearSolverSplice` a few lines down. This time, I verified that the `Ewoms::Linear::ParallelBiCGStabSolverBackend` was used if the offending line was commented out. also, Norne worked fine with the default solver as long as the Schur complement for the wells was done explicitly. Finally, the naming of the eWoms API is a bit inconsistent (`setMatrix()` vs. `setResidual()`). any opinions here? I'm fine with whatever. |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| autodiff | ||
| core | ||
| simulators | ||