The `details_enabled` site setting description did not clearly convey what it controls.
The copy change was discussed here: https://meta.discourse.org/t/183923
`emailOrUsername` was renamed to `invitee` in a recent change to app/assets/javascripts/discourse/app/components/invite-panel.js and needed to be updated in client.en.yml
This change fixes an issue with the user group chooser of a tag group's settings. It was impossible to clear any selected groups through the UI.
The `setPermissionsGroups` function determines which groups appear selected in the group-chooser based on the passed-in `groupIds` array.
It starts with `updatedPermissions` being set to the group permissions as they were prior to the action that called the function. From there, we were correctly adding a group permission to `updatedPermissions` whenever a group appeared in `groupIds`. This addressed newly added groups and also maintained any group permissions that had been set before. The problem was that there was no logic to remove a group permission when the associated group no longer appeared in `groupIds`. If a group isn't included in `groupIds`, we can simply attempt to delete an associated group permission if it exists.
This is a tiny change that will allow users to hover the date element of a full page search result to see the raw date. It's not always easy to know what the exact date was "20d" ago, so hopefully this helps when it's relevant.
Being that system badges ship with every instance of Discourse, we've opted to define the name, description, and long description in our locales files to promote translation into other languages. When an admin visited the overview page of a system badge in their admin panel, they were met with disabled inputs for these text properties. The problem is that we failed to educate the admin that the text needs to be managed via the site text customization settings.
This change adds a small "Customize Text" link under theses inputs that takes the admin to the specific site text customization where they can make desired changes.
This adds a new min_trust_level_to_allow_ignore site setting that enables admins to control the point at which a user is allowed to ignore other users.
Now that we have dark logo settings in core, we can relatively easily ensure that static pages (such as the 404 page) use a logo that is appropriate for the given light or dark color scheme.
This will make a few minor improvements to the second factor user interface. Highlights include:
- Using the site's title to prefix the backup code filename. If non-ascii characters are detected, then prefix "discourse" instead.
- Add icons and change the text on some of the buttons for better clarity and consistency
- Add an education link to the security key modal
We use the `periodical_updates` and `weekly` background jobs to retroactively add/remove the "Summarize This Topic" button for topics according to the `summary_posts_required` or `summary_likes_required` site settings.
- Increase size of the reviewable's conversation excerpt to prevent truncation of the new copy
- Remove the `domain` parameter from the `flag_linked_posts_as_spam` method in the user model since it is no longer needed
- Remove the `domain` interpolation variable from all translation files
- Add "All posts from this user that include links should be reviewed." to server.en.yml for added clarity on why the posts entered the queue
If dashboard advice has already been acted on, an admin may want to find out what the advice was, who acted on it, and when. Linking to the staff action logs should help in tracking down this information.
tshenry