* FIX: Don't lose SummaryBox state through widget re-renders.
The <SummaryBox /> component state will get lost when scrolling to the bottom of a topic. Due to the widget being re-rendered, it will go back to the collapsed state, and we need to fetch the summary again.
This change moves all the state updates to the postStream model, which also refreshes the widget to keep it updated.
* Reify topic summary using a pojo
Streaming doesn't work for anonymous users because we scope updates to the current user. Since they can only see cached summaries, we can skip the streaming parameter and update it directly with the ajax response.
This PR changes how we track which lists are available for a topic and how we decide which is the active one. The new approach centralizes everything in the service, and exposes functions for adding/removing a list, which each calls via `did-insert/will-destroy` modifiers.
It makes it much easier to track and update state when navigated to another topic or PM, ensuring things get updated correctly.
Our code assumed the content_range interval was inclusive, but they are open-ended due to Postgres' [discrete range types](https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/rangetypes.html#RANGETYPES-DISCRETE), meaning [1,2] will be represented as [1,3).
It also fixes some flaky tests due to test data not being correctly setup and the registry not being resetted after each test.
When we receive the stream parameter, we'll queue a job that periodically publishes partial updates, and after the summarization finishes, a final one with the completed version, plus metadata.
`summary-box` listens to these updates via MessageBus, and updates state accordingly.
* REFACTOR: Glimerify topic summarization widgets.
Simplifies all the logic for generating/regenerating summaries and expanding/collapsing the summary box. It makes streaming easier to implement since now we can subscribe to message bus directly from the component.
* Update app/assets/javascripts/discourse/app/components/summary-box.hbs
Co-authored-by: David Taylor <david@taylorhq.com>
* Update app/assets/javascripts/discourse/app/components/summary-box.hbs
Co-authored-by: David Taylor <david@taylorhq.com>
* Update app/assets/javascripts/discourse/app/components/summary-box.hbs
Co-authored-by: David Taylor <david@taylorhq.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: David Taylor <david@taylorhq.com>
Adds a padding-bottom to the wrapper to avoid cutting the message on the mobile app and sets a max-width to align with the timeline on the desktop.
Fixes a bug on mobile where we updated the preference, but the user had a single list.
We never propagated the preference change because of the early return, meaning lists listening to it never got to decide if they had to remain hidden.
Also, we don't want to track the preference when there's a single list, as the user didn't choose to see it.
This PR updates how we display related and suggested topics on mobile and desktop. It adds a new `PluginOutlet` specifically designed for adding new topic lists, which automatically work if following the same conventions as the ones inside `<MoreTopics />`.
While we display lists side by side on desktop, we only display one in mobile. You can switch to another one by clicking on the nav pills, and we'll automatically save your preference for next time.
* UX: Disclose AI model used and add animation to placeholder
* Move text into hbs template
DTooltip (weirdly) attaches to a sibling element, so we need something else to be rendered inside the RenderGlimmer wrapper div
---------
Co-authored-by: David Taylor <david@taylorhq.com>
* FEATURE: Inline topic summary. Cached version accessible to everyone.
Anons and non-members of the `custom_summarization_allowed_groups_map` groups can see cached summaries for any accessible topic. After the first 12 hours and if the posts to summarize have changed, allowed users clicking on the button will automatically re-generate it.
* Ensure chat summaries work and prevent model hallucinations when there are no messages.
Updates the interface for implementing summarization strategies and adds a cache layer to summarize topics once.
The cache stores the final summary and each chunk used to build it, which will be useful when we have to extend or rebuild it.
* FEATURE: Content custom summarization strategies.
This PR establishes a pattern for plugins to register alternative ways of summarizing content by extending a class that defines an interface.
Core controls which strategy we'll use and who has access to it through the `summarization_strategy` and `custom_summarization_allowed_groups`. It also defines the UI for summarizing topics.
Other plugins can access this summarization mechanism and implement their features, removing cross-plugin customizations, as it currently happens between chat and the discourse-ai plugin.
* Group membership validation and rate limiting
* Work with objects instead of classes
* Port summarization feature from discourse-ai to chat
* Rename available summaries to 'Top Replies' and 'Summary'
Followup to #20915. If we're grouping search results that don't rely on core's search, we won't have access to pg headlines. This is now configurable via the constructor, defaulting to `SiteSetting.use_pg_headlines_for_excerpt`
First follow-up to the feature introduced in #19034. We don't want to pollute main components like `chat-live-pane`, so we'll use a service to track and manage the state needed to display before-send warnings while composing a chat message.
We also move from acceptance tests to system specs.
Deleting a message with a mention doesn't clear the associated notification, confusing the mentioned user.
There are different chat notification types, but we only care about `chat_mentioned` since `chat_quoted` is associated with a post, and `chat_message` is only for push notifications.
Unfortunately, this change doesn't fix the chat bubble getting out of sync when a message gets deleted since we track unread/mentions count with an integer, making it a bit hard to manipulate. We can follow up later if we consider it necessary.
* DEV: Rnemae channel path to just c
Also swap the channel id and channel slug params to be consistent with core.
* linting
* channel_path
* Drop slugify helper and channel route without slug
* Request slug and route models through the channel model if possible
* DEV: Pass messageId as a dynamic segment instead of a query param
* Ensure change is backwards-compatible
* drop query param from oneboxes
* Correctly extract channelId from routes
* Better route organization using siblings for regular and near-message
* Ensures sessions are unique even when using parallelism
* prevents didReceiveAttrs to clear input mid test
* we disable animations in capybara so sometimes the message was barely showing
* adds wait
* ensures finished loading
* is it causing more harm than good?
* this check is slowing things for no reason
* actually target the button
* more resilient select chat message
* apply similar fix to bookmark
* fix
---------
Co-authored-by: Joffrey JAFFEUX <j.jaffeux@gmail.com>
* DEV: Rnemae channel path to just c
Also swap the channel id and channel slug params to be consistent with core.
* linting
* channel_path
* params in wrong order
* Drop slugify helper and channel route without slug
* Request slug and route models through the channel model if possible
* Add client side redirection for backwards-compatibility
Co-authored-by: Joffrey JAFFEUX <j.jaffeux@gmail.com>
This PR removes the limit added to max_users_notified_per_group_mention during #19034 and improve the performance when expanding mentions for large channel or groups by removing some N+1 queries and making the whole process async.
* Fully async chat message notifications
* Remove mention setting limit and get rid of N+1 queries
* FEATURE: Enforce mention limits for chat messages
The first part of these changes adds a new setting called `max_mentions_per_chat_message`, which skips notifications when the message contains too many mentions. It also respects the `max_users_notified_per_group_mention` setting
and skips notifications if expanding a group mention would exceed it.
We also include a new component to display JIT warning for these limits to the user while composing a message.
* Simplify ignoring/muting filter in chat_notifier
* Post-send warnings for unsent warnings
* Improve pluralization
* Address review feedback
* Fix test
* Address second feedback round
* Third round of feedback
Co-authored-by: Joffrey JAFFEUX <j.jaffeux@gmail.com>
This commit introduce a new API for registering callbacks, which we'll execute when a user gets destroyed, and the `delete_posts` opt is true. The chat plugin registers one callback and queues a job to destroy every message from that user in batches.
* FIX: Unsilence users on chat message flag disagree.
We have an auto silence rule in place for chat message flags, so we need to unsilence users if the flag gets rejected.
Additionally, it also fixes the `disagree_and_restore` action, which wasn't recovering a deleted message.
* Update plugins/chat/spec/models/reviewable_chat_message_spec.rb
Co-authored-by: Joffrey JAFFEUX <j.jaffeux@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Joffrey JAFFEUX <j.jaffeux@gmail.com>
The mailer in charge of sending chat summary emails applies a filter to ensure only members of groups listed in the `chat allowed groups` setting receive them. However, when you set it to `everyone`, nobody will be notified because
we treat this group differently and don't create `GroupUser` records for every user on the site.
This commit changes the mailer to skip the filter when the `everyone` ID is in the list.
Since the migration was added as a post migration, we'll try to add the constraint first, causing a NotNullViolation exception.
This only affects sites that were last deployed more than two days ago.
This commit excludes posts from hidden topics from the latest posts and user activity RSS feeds. Additionally, it also excludes small actions from the first one.
* REFACTOR: Improve reusability by Decoupling flag modal from flag target.
We want chat message's flags to have the same features as topic and posts' flags, but we prefer not having to duplicate core's logic. This PR moves target specific bits to different classes, allowing plugins to flag custom things by
providing their own.
* A couple of fixes for the flag modal:
- Make sure buttons are disabled until a flag type is selected.
- Don't throw an error when checking if the user can undo an action on a deleted topic.
- Disable flagging on deleted topics.
`delete_previous!` deletes existing topics even when we cannot send a new one due to the `limit_once_per` option. The dashboard problems PM gets deleted the next time the job runs (30 minutes), so the inbox could be empty when
admins click on the summary notification.
Handles edge-case when a user is an admin and has an associated reviewable. Hitting this exception should be rare since we clear the reviewable when
granting staff to the user.
* FEATURE: Let sites add a sitemap.xml file.
This PR adds the same features discourse-sitemap provides to core. Sitemaps are only added to the robots.txt file if the `enable_sitemap` setting is enabled and `login_required` disabled.
After merging discourse/discourse-sitemap#34, this change will take priority over the sitemap plugin because it will disable itself. We're also using the same sitemaps table, so our migration won't try to create it
again using `if_not_exists: true`.
The category table's required_tag_group_id contained references to deleted tag groups, which we copied to the new table. The new serializer tries to get the associated tag group name but fails because the tag group is nil.
This PR adds an inner join in the original migration to make sure tag groups still exist and adds a new post-migration to fix already migrated sites.
Plugins like chat add custom score type to override the title in the UI, but that should be reserved for situations when you need to manage the flag priority separately, which is configurable in the queue settings page.
Currently, if a plugin creates a custom score type, it won't be able to associate a priority, so there's no real gain from doing so. Priorities are tightly related to post-action types, which is something we might want to revise. For now, this change lets plugins move away from custom score types without compromises.
* FIX: Mark invites flash messages as HTML safe.
This change should be safe as all user inputs included in the errors are sanitized before sending it back to the client.
Context: https://meta.discourse.org/t/html-tags-are-explicit-after-latest-update/214220
* If somebody adds a new error message that includes user input and doesn't sanitize it, using html-safe suddenly becomes unsafe again. As an extra layer of protection, we make the client sanitize the error message received from the backend.
* Escape user input instead of sanitizing
* FIX: Pass category and tag IDs to the emit webhook event job.
Like webhooks won't fire when they're scoped to specific categories or tags because we're not passing the data to the job that emits it.
* Update config/initializers/012-web_hook_events.rb
Co-authored-by: Dan Ungureanu <dan@ungureanu.me>
Co-authored-by: Dan Ungureanu <dan@ungureanu.me>
You can add callbacks that get called before updating an already consolidated notification or creating a consolidated one.
Instances of this rule can add callbacks to access the old notifications about to be destroyed or the consolidated one and add additional data inside the data hash versus having to execute extra queries when adding this logic inside the `set_mutations` block.
I plan to use this in an upcoming discourse-reactions PR, where I want to like a post without notifying the user, so I can instead create a reaction notification.
Additionally, we decouple the a11y attributes from the icon itself, which will let us extend the widget's icon without losing them.
This PR moves the behavior from the PostAlerter. We delete an existing liked notification and set the `username2` attribute to the previous `display_username`. We repeat this process unless the last one is old enough or it's not in the most recent ones.
We previously used ConsolidateNotifications with a threshold of 1 to re-use an existing notification and bump it to the top instead of creating a new one. It produces some jumpiness in the user notification list, and it relies on updating the `created_at` attribute, which is a bit hacky.
As a better alternative, we're introducing a new plan that deletes all the previous versions of the notification, then creates a new one.
Roman Rizzi
