Adds 2 factor authentication method via second factor security keys over [web authn](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Web_Authentication_API).
Allows a user to authenticate a second factor on login, login-via-email, admin-login, and change password routes. Adds registration area within existing user second factor preferences to register multiple security keys. Supports both external (yubikey) and built-in (macOS/android fingerprint readers).
Advanced trigger is currently broken on:
ca
es
et
fr
he
it
pt_BR
And that is because the translation levels for the plugin are kinda low, so I would guess it's broken for half the languages.
Since we have only two tracks for a while now, a quick fix to me is inverting the selectors.
This patch works because the advanced key is "larger" than the new user one.
Currently, the topic is only validated for censored words and should be validated for blocked words as well.
Blocked word validation is now used by both Post and Topic. To avoid code duplication, I extracted blocked words validation code into separate Validator, and use it in both places.
The only downside is that even if the topic contains blocked words validation message is saying "Your post contains a word that's not allowed: tomato" but I think this is descriptive enough.
Some site settings (e.g. `unicode_username_character_whitelist`) depend on the default locale, so we need to reset the watched settings when the locale changes.
Keeps element 1em away from the right edge of screen
Takes DiscourseHub app nav position into account on iPad
Uses outerHeight to calculate element height including padding/borders
This updates rubyzip library so that callers can trust entries when
extracting files avoiding situations where a rogues zip imported by a rogue
admin could cause a disk space issue.
This corrects an XSS in ?pp=help.
Also removes the jQuery dependency from rack-mini-profiler and restricts
memory sensitive profiling methods development only.
Per new lifecycle https://developers.google.com/web/updates/2018/07/page-lifecycle-api
On Android and latest Chrome when an app transitions from "frozen" to
active the new "resume" event fires with no accompanying "visibilitychange"
event.
This means that often background tabs may be stuck thinking that discourse
has no focus when, indeed, it has.
This leads to cases where no posts are marked read anymore.
This applies to iPhones running iOS 13+.
Previous technique remains in place for iOS 12 and below.
Note that this does not apply to iPads on iOS 13 due to Apple no longer
identifying iPads in the user agent string.
The current manifest validation in Chrome requires at least one
non-maskable icon to make it installable.
This commit adds the maskable entry as another entry, following up
on changes added in 3e590b8
Because:
- Chrome 78 and Firefox Fenix have support for it
- The icons will look better by using all the availiable space
- Admins can control the icon and add appropriate padding since we have a
dedicated asset for the manifest logo. Read more about it on
https://css-tricks.com/maskable-icons-android-adaptive-icons-for-your-pwa/
This commit:
- Adds a new key under the icons array in the webmanifest, named purpose
with maskable value.
Previously, calculating thresholds for reviewables was done based on the
50th and 85th percentile across all reviewables. However, many forum
owners provided feedback that these thresholds were too easy to hit, in
particular when it came to auto hiding content.
The calculation has been adjusted to base the priorities on reviewables
that have a minimum of 2 scores (flags). This should push the amount of
flags required to hide something higher then before.
On forums with very few flags you don't want to calculate averages
because they won't be very useful. Stick with the defaults until we hit
15 reviewables at least.
Forums without previously calculated scores would return the same values
for low/medium/high sensitivity. Now those are scaled based on the
default value.
The default value has also been changed from 10.0 to 12.5 based on
observing data from live discourse forums.
This means that TL0 users can message groups with "Who can message this
group?" set to "Everyone".
It also means that members of a group with "Who can message this
group?" set to "members, moderators and admins" can also message the
group, even when their trust level is below min_trust_to_send_messages.
If dashboard advice has already been acted on, an admin may want to find out what the advice was, who acted on it, and when. Linking to the staff action logs should help in tracking down this information.