Subcategories were not returned when lazy loaded categories are enabled.
This commit implements the old behavior which displayed only top level
categories when there was no search term, but when there was one, it
searched subcategories too.
This commit also removes the client-side ordering of categories, because
the results are already ordered on the server-side.
Recently, Discourse introduced the concept of wrapper plugin outlets, which enables plugins and theme-components lo replace the wrapped content:
```
<PluginOutlet @name="wrapper-outlet-example" @outletArgs={{hash model=@model}}>
<div>Overridable content</div>
</PluginOutlet>
```
This commit adds automatic outlets that are placed `before` and `after wrapper plugin outlets. Connectors them can leverage these new automatic outlets to mount content at these positions, which greatly enhances the use case of the wrapper outlets.
These new auto outlets can be used in two ways:
- Using the standard folder base structure: the folder name that identifies the outlet in which the connector must be mounted must add the suffixes `__before`or `__after` to the outlet name. For the outlet in the example above, the connector should be placed into the `.../connectors/wrapper-outlet-example__before`or `.../connectors/wrapper-outlet-example__after`folders.
- Using API calls: this commit also introduces two new plugin APIs, `api.renderBeforeWrapperOutlet` and `renderAfterWrapperOutlet`. These new APIs can be used in the same way as `api.renderInOutlet`but will only work for wrapper outlets.
For the outlet above when using these new APIs alongside the gjs file format, one could define a component to be placed before the content of the outlet like:
```
api.renderBeforeWrapperOutlet('wrapper-outlet-example', <template>Hello from before the content</template>);
```
or after:
```
api.renderAfterWrapperOutlet('wrapper-outlet-example', <template>Hello from after the content</template>);
```
The uncategorized category was not rendered correctly and it was also
sometimes displayed twice. This commit is a similar bug fix to commit
76647d3a34 and is a follow up to commit
63a50b12fd.
If a user had `123456789` as username, it could be passed to the query as a number and the query would fail as it expects a string.
Also applies the same fix to groups.
Why this change?
We noticed that running `LOAD_PLUGINS=1 rspec --seed=38855 plugins/chat/spec/system/chat_new_message_spec.rb` locally
results in the system tests randomly failing. When we inspected the
request logs closely, we noticed that a `/presence/get` request from a
previous rspec example was being processed when a new rspec example is
already being run. We know it was from the previous rspec example
because inspecting the auth token showed the request using the auth
token of a user from the previous example. However, when a request using
an auth token from a previous example is used it ends up logging out the
same user on the server side because the user id in the cookie is the same
due to the use of `fab!`.
I did some research and there is apparently no way to wait until all
inflight requests by the browser has completed through capybara or
selenium. Therefore, we will add an identifier by attaching a cookie to all non-xhr requests so that
xhr requests which are triggered subsequently will contain the cookie in the request.
In the `BlockRequestsMiddleware` middleware, we will then reject any
requests when the value of the identifier in the cookie does not match the current rspec's example
location.
To see the problem locally, change `Auth::DefaultCurrentUserProvider.find_v1_auth_cookie` to the following:
```
def self.find_v1_auth_cookie(env)
return env[DECRYPTED_AUTH_COOKIE] if env.key?(DECRYPTED_AUTH_COOKIE)
env[DECRYPTED_AUTH_COOKIE] = begin
request = ActionDispatch::Request.new(env)
cookie = request.cookies[TOKEN_COOKIE]
# don't even initialize a cookie jar if we don't have a cookie at all
if cookie&.valid_encoding? && cookie.present?
puts "#{env["REQUEST_PATH"]} #{request.cookie_jar.encrypted[TOKEN_COOKIE]&.with_indifferent_access}"
request.cookie_jar.encrypted[TOKEN_COOKIE]&.with_indifferent_access
end
end
end
```
After which run the following command: `LOAD_PLUGINS=1 rspec --format documentation --seed=38855 plugins/chat/spec/system/chat_new_message_spec.rb`
It takes a few tries but the last spec should fail and you should see something like this:
```
assets/chunk.c16f6ba8b6824baa47ac.d41d8cd9.js {"token"=>"37d995a4b65395d3b343ec70fff915b4", "user_id"=>3382, "username"=>"bruce0", "trust_level"=>1, "issued_at"=>1708591735}
/assets/chunk.050148142e1d2dc992dd.d41d8cd9.js {"token"=>"37d995a4b65395d3b343ec70fff915b4", "user_id"=>3382, "username"=>"bruce0", "trust_level"=>1, "issued_at"=>1708591735}
/chat/api/channels/527/messages {"token"=>"37d995a4b65395d3b343ec70fff915b4", "user_id"=>3382, "username"=>"bruce0", "trust_level"=>1, "issued_at"=>1708591735}
/uploads/default/test_0/optimized/1X/_129430568242d1b7f853bb13ebea28b3f6af4e7_2_512x512.png {"token"=>"37d995a4b65395d3b343ec70fff915b4", "user_id"=>3382, "username"=>"bruce0", "trust_level"=>1, "issued_at"=>1708591735}
redirects to existing chat channel
redirects to chat channel if recipients param is missing (PENDING: Temporarily skipped with xit)
with multiple users
/favicon.ico {"token"=>"9a75c114c4d3401509a23d240f0a46d4", "user_id"=>3382, "username"=>"bruce0", "trust_level"=>1, "issued_at"=>1708591736}
/chat/new-message {"token"=>"9a75c114c4d3401509a23d240f0a46d4", "user_id"=>3382, "username"=>"bruce0", "trust_level"=>1, "issued_at"=>1708591736}
/presence/get {"token"=>"37d995a4b65395d3b343ec70fff915b4", "user_id"=>3382, "username"=>"bruce0", "trust_level"=>1, "issued_at"=>1708591735}
```
Note how the `/presence/get` request is using a token from the previous example.
Co-authored-by: David Taylor <david@taylorhq.com>
Why this change?
The previous test setup did not actually act as a regression test
because the test will still pass even when the fix is removed. This
commit uses a rendering test instead to ensure that Ember is tracking
the property change.
Why this change?
We have been getting customisation requests about adding stuff
before/after the sidebar sections so we are adding plugin outlets to
support those requests.
Why this change?
This regressed in b797434376 where
the count property in `ExtraNavItem` needs to be tracked as plugins can
be updating the count property directly.
Why this change?
`current_url` does not rely on Capybara waiters so opt to use
`have_current_path` matcher instead. Also assert for email against
element displayed on the page instead of querying the database for it
which isn't really what system tests are meant for.
Add categories to the serialized search results together with the topics
when lazy load categories is enabled. This is necessary in order for the
results to be rendered correctly and display the category information.
We're starting to use this system for non-ember-5 deprecations, so linking to the Ember 5 topic doesn't make sense. Instead, we can include the deprecation ID to help with identifying the issue.
Why this change?
The current shape of errors returns the error messages after it has been
translated but there are cases where we want to customize the error
messages and the current way return only translated error messages is
making customization of error messages difficult. If we
wish to have the error messages in complete sentences like
"`some_property` property must be present in #link 1", this is not
possible at the moment with the current shape of the errors we return.
What does this change do?
This change introduces the `ThemeSettingsObjectValidator::ThemeSettingsObjectErrors`
and `ThemeSettingsObjectValidator::ThemeSettingsObjectError` classes to
hold the relevant error key and i18n translation options.
We have separated and combined modes for sidebar panels.
Separated means the panels show only their own sections,
combined means sections from all panels are shown.
The admin sidebar only shows its own panels, so it must set
the mode to separated; however when we navigate to chat or
home we must revert to the initial mode setttings.
When hiding/showing the sidebar, as is the case on mobile
and using the toggle in the top left on desktop, we delete
and recreate the ember component on the page. This causes
the `sections` for each sidebar panel to get re-evaluated
every time.
For the admin sidebar, this means that we were constantly
re-adding the plugin links to the sidebar, causing duplication.
This can be fixed by just adding @cached to the getter for
sections.
The Digital Services Act requires a checkbox for any user who's flagging a post as illegal to confirm that they are flagging in good faith. This PR adds that.
Why this change?
This change supports a property of `type: category` in the schema that
is declared for a theme setting object. Example:
```
sections:
type: objects
schema:
name: section
properties:
category_property:
type: category
```
The value of a property declared as `type: category` will have to be a
valid id of a row in the `categories` table.
What does this change do?
Adds a property value validation step for `type: category`. Care has
been taken to ensure that we do not spam the database with a ton of
requests if there are alot of category typed properties. This is done by
walking through the entire object and collecting all the values for
properties typed category. After which, a single database query is
executed to validate which values are valid.
Why this change?
Firstly, note that this is not a security commit because this feature is
still in development and should not be used anywhere.
The reason we want to set a limit here is to greatly reduce the
possibility of a DoS attack in the future via `ThemeSetting` where
someone would set an arbituary large json string in
`ThemeSetting#json_value` and causing the server to run out of resources
trying to serialize/deserialize the value.
What does this change do?
Adds an ActiveRecord validation to ensure that the bytesize of the json
string being stored is smaller than or equal to 0.5mb. We believe 0.5mb
is a decent limit for now but we can review the limit in the future if
we believe it is too small.
Why this change?
The logic for validating a theme setting's value and default value was
not consistent as each part of the code would implement its own logic.
This is not ideal as the default value may be validated differently than
when we are setting a new value. Therefore, this commit seeks to
refactor all the validation logic for a theme setting's value into a
single service class.
What does this change do?
Introduce the `ThemeSettingsValidator` service class which holds all the
necessary helper methods required to validate a theme setting's value
