* FEATURE: Redirect logged in user to invite topic
Users who were already logged in and were given an invite link to a
topic used to see an error message saying that they already have an
account and cannot redeem the invite. This commit amends that behavior
and redirects the user directly to the topic, if they can see it.
* FEATURE: Add logged in user to invite groups
Users who were already logged in and were given an invite link to a
group used to see an error message saying that they already have an
account and cannot redeem the invite. This commit amends that behavior
and adds the user to the group.
This cookie is used to transmit notification read state to the server. It is always cleared by the server on the next page load, so there is no need for the expiry to be so long. This commit updates it to expire at the end of the session (the default), and replaces raw `document.cookie` usage with our `cookie` library.
In some conditions, pages were skipped. This was implemented in the past
in f490a8d, but then reverted in 04ec543, because sometimes it was stuck
reloading the first page.
The code that loads more results was simplified and a lot of duplicate
code was removed. The logic to remove users who changed their vote was
also introduced again, but just for the regular polls.
This PR adds uppy to the project with a custom JS build and the shims needed to import it into our JS code. We need a custom build of Uppy because we do not use webpack for our JS modules/build. The only way to get what you want from Uppy is to use the webpack modules or to include the entire Uppy project including all plugins in a single JS file. This way we can just use the plugins we actually want. Future PRs will actually use Uppy!
The endpoint the existence of the poll and if the current user can see it. It
will facilitate using a poll programmatically, especially if we'd like to create an external poll through a theme component.
Take 2 of https://github.com/discourse/discourse/pull/13466.
Fixes a few issues with the original PR:
- color definition stylesheet target now includes the theme id, to avoid themes set to use the default color scheme loading the same stylesheet
- changes the internal cache key for color definition stylesheet to reset the pre-existing cache
A more complex algorithm was used to achieve consensus between server
and client lists of notifications. This commit uses a different and
more simple approach that ignores order, but updates read status of
existing notifications and removes stale notifications.
And also move all the "top topics by period" routes to query string param.
/top/monthly => /top?period=monthly
/c/:slug/:id/l/top/monthly => /c/:slug/:id/l/top?period=monthly
/tag/:slug/l/top/daily => /tag/:slug/l/top?period=daily (new)
Users can invite people to topics from secured category, but they will
not be redirected to the topic after signing up unless they have the
permissions to view the topic. This commit shows a warning when invite
is saved if the topic is in a secured category and none of the invite
groups are allowed to see it.
`bin/rake annotate` is an alias of `bin/annotate --models`
`bin/rake annotate:clean` generates annotations by using a temporary, freshly migrated database. This should help us to produce more consistent annotations, even if development databases have been polluted by plugin migrations.
A GitHub actions task is also added which generates annotations on a clean database, and raises an error if they differ from the committed annotations.
Use the `sidekiq_retry_in` code from Jobs::UserEmail in group SMTP. Also we don't need to keep `seconds_to_delay` -- sidekiq uses the default delay calculation if you return 0 or nil from the block. See 3330df0ee3/lib/sidekiq/job_retry.rb (L216-L234) for sidekiq default retry delay logic.
I experimented with extracting this into a concern or a module, but `sidekiq_retry_in` is quite magic and it would not allow me to abstract away into a module that calls some method specificall in the child job class.
I would love to write tests for this, but it does not seem possible (not sure if its because of our test
setup) to write tests that test sidekiq's retry capability, and I am not sure if we should be anyway. Initial addition
to UserEmail did not test this functionality
d224966a0e
* UX: Remove background image after image has loaded
If an image has a `smallUpload`, that may be set as the `background-image` on the `img` element, and the `img` element set to use `lazy` loading. When the browser decides to load the `src` of the image element, it is rendered on top of the existing background image.
However, if the image proper has a transparent background, the background image may be partially visible through the transparent portions of the image.
This change creates an `onload` event that removes the background image when the image proper has completed loading.
Partially revert f490a8d39a because we aren't able to
load more than the initially preloaded voters.
We were always trying to load the 1st page of voters.
Also removed the "remove users who changed their vote" logic as it was not properly working in multiple choices polls.
cc @nbianca
Skip group SMTP email (and add log) if:
* topic is deleted
* post is deleted
* smtp has been disabled for the group
Skip without log if:
* enable_smtp site setting is false
* disable_emails site setting is yes
Co-authored-by: Alan Guo Xiang Tan <gxtan1990@gmail.com>
For other private messages we have the site setting
personal_email_time_window_seconds (default 20s) which allows
people to edit their post etc. before the email is sent.
This PR makes the Jobs::GroupSmtpEmail enqueuer in the
PostAlerter use the same delay.
<!-- NOTE: All pull requests should have tests (rspec in Ruby, qunit in JavaScript). If your code does not include test coverage, please include an explanation of why it was omitted. -->
